Dispelling Stereotypes… Skate Parks as a Setting for Pro-Social Behavior among Young People

Abstract

Issue Addressed: Skate parks not only provide a venue for leisure and physical activity, but can also act as an important social space for young people (Jones, 2011). However, skate parks are often subjected to negative community stereotyping (Goldenberg & Shooter, 2009; Bradley, 2010; Weston, 2010, Taylor & Khan, 2011), and there has been a lack of empirical evidence to date to refute or support conjecture about the presence of anti- or pro-social behaviors. Methods: A community survey gathered data on use and perceptions of a skate park within an inner metropolitan suburb of Western Australia. Respondents (n = 387) were asked about the frequency at the skate park of a range of potentially occurring behaviors of both an anti-social (e.g. graffiti, conflict) and pro-social (e.g. socialising, teaching) nature. Observational data of skate park use were also collected. Results: Pro-social behaviours were much more likely to be reported as frequently occurring, with all six of the pro-social behaviors (cooperation, learning from others, socialising with friends, respecting others, taking turns, teaching and helping) noted as occurring often by more than 50% of the respondents. The anti-social behaviours asked about in the survey fall within three thematic categories relating to physical space (egcrowding, collisions and injuries); property damage (eglittering, graffiti and vandalism); and drug use (smoking, drinking alcohol and illicit drug taking). Of these, behaviors relating to shared use of the physical space were more likely to be reported as occurring often or sometimes, in part reflecting the popular use of the relatively small skate park area. Overall, anti-social behaviors were more likely to be reported as rarely or never occurring compared with pro-social behaviors. Conclusions: Concerns about undesirable social behavior often underlie opposition to skate parks or provision for skaters in cities and suburbs. However, actual evidence supporting these assertions is scant, and in this study, pro-social behaviors were far more commonly observed than anti-social behavior. Considered skate park location and planning, and engagement of young people in their design can minimise many perceived problems. More broadly, the visible presence of skate parks and other youth amenity in our neighbourhoods, towns and cities, powerfully signals to young people that they too are welcome and a part of local place identity.

Share and Cite:

Wood, L. , Carter, M. and Martin, K. (2014) Dispelling Stereotypes… Skate Parks as a Setting for Pro-Social Behavior among Young People. Current Urban Studies, 2, 62-73. doi: 10.4236/cus.2014.21007.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] ABS (2012). 4901.0—Children’s Participation in Cultural and Leisure Activities, Australia. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/4901.0Main%20Features6Apr%202012?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4901.0&issue=Apr%202012&num=&view
[2] Ainsworth, B., Haskell W., Whitt M., Irwin M., Swartz A., Strath S., et al. (2000). Compendium of Physical Activities: An Update of Activity Codes and MET Intensities. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, 32, S498-S516.
[3] Aperio Consulting (2005). The Urban Grind: Skateparks: Neighborhood Perceptions And Planning Realities.
[4] Beal, B. (1996). Alternative Masculinity and Its Effects on Gender Relations in the Subculture of Skateboarding. Journal of Sport Behavior, 19, 204-220.
[5] Bradley, G. (2010). Skate Parks as a Context for Adolescent Development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0743558409357236
[6] Bradley, G., & Stinson, K. (2008). Skaters’ Paradise? A Study of Gold Coast City Skate Parks and Their Users. Gold Coast: Gold Coast City Council.
[7] Buskens, N., & Harbottle, R. (2005). Skate Park Operations Manual. Melbourne: YMCA Victoria.
[8] Caldwell, L., & Smith, E. (2006). Leisure as a Context for Youth Development and Delinquency Prevention. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39, 398-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/acri.39.3.398
[9] Chipuer, H. M., & Pretty, G. H. (2000). Facets of Adolescents’ Loneliness: A Study of Rural and Urban Australian Youth. Australian Psychologist, 35, 233-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00050060008257484
[10] City of Norwood, P. S. P. (2006). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED): Guidelines for Local Government. Norwood.
[11] Goldenberg, M., & Shooter, W. (2009). Skateboard Park Participation: A Means-End Analysis. Journal of Youth Development, 4, 37-48.
[12] Jenson, A., Swords J., & Jeffries, M. (2012). The Accidental Youth Club: Skateboarding in Newcastle-Gateshead. Journal of Urban Design, 17, 371-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2012.683400
[13] Jones, R. (2011). Sport and Re/Creation: What Skateboarders Can Teach Us about Learning. Sport, Education and Society, 16, 593-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.601139
[14] Jones, S., & Graves, A. (2000). Power Plays in Public Space: Skateboard Parks as Battlegrounds, Gifts, and Expressions of Self. Landscape Journal, 19, 136.
[15] Kellett, P., & Russell, R. (2009). A Comparison between Mainstream and Action Sport Industries in Australia: A Case Study of the Skateboarding Cluster. Sport Management Review, 12, 66-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2008.12.003
[16] Lynch, M., & Ogilvie, E. (1999). Access to Amenities: The Issue of Ownership. Youth Studies Australia, 18.
[17] Martin, K., Rosenberg, M., Miller, M., French, S., McCormack, G., Bull, F., Giles-Corti, B., & Pratt, S. (2010). Move and Munch Final Report. Trends in Physical Activity, Nutrition and Body Size in Western Australian Children and Adolescents: The Child and Adolescent Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey (CAPANS) 2008.
[18] Martin, K., & Wood, L. (2013). “We Live Here Too”… What Makes a Child Friendly Neighbourhood? In R. D.-C. A. C. C., Elizabeth Burton (Ed.), Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, in press.
[19] Moore, T., & Carter, M. (2011). Focus on Fleming Reserve, High Wycombe. Australasian Parks and Leisure, 14, 10-14.
[20] Németh, J. (2006). Conflict, Exclusion, Relocation: Skateboarding and Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 11, 297-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574800600888343
[21] Owens, P. (2002). No Teens Allowed: The Exclusion of Adolescents from Public Spaces. Landscape Journal, 21, 156.
[22] Passon, C., Levi, D., & del Rio, V. (2008). Implications of Adolescents’ Perceptions and Values for Planning and Design. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 73-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08319236
[23] Petrone, R. (2010). You Have to Get Hit a Couple of Times: The Role of Conflict in Learning How to Be a Skateboarder. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 119-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.005
[24] Rogers, P., & Coaffee, J. (2005). Moral Panics and Urban Renaissance. City, 9, 321-340.
[25] Save Claremont Skatepark (2013). Save Claremont Skatepark.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-claremont-Skatepark/148389431901114
[26] Shannon, C., & Werner, T. (2008). The Opening of a Municipal Skate Park: Exploring the Influence on Youth Skateboarders’ Experiences. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26, 39-58.
[27] Skate Australia (2009). Skate Australia Independent Submission to the Panel for the Independent Review into Sport.
http://www.skateaustralia.org.au/images/stories/skate_australia/documents/pdf/Skate_Australia_
Independent_Sport_Panel_Submission.pdf
[28] Taylor, M., & Khan, U. (2011). Skate-Park Builds, Teenaphobia and the Adolescent Need for Hang-Out Spaces: The Social Utility and Functionality of Urban Skate Parks. Journal of Urban Design, 16, 489-510.
[29] Taylor, M., & Marais, I. (2011). Not in My Back Schoolyard: Schools and Skate-Park Builds in Western Australia. Australian Planner, 48, 84-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.586142
[30] Taylor, M. F., & Khan, U. (2011). Skate-Park Builds, Teenaphobia and the Adolescent Need for Hang-Out Spaces: The Social Utility and Functionality of Urban Skate Parks. Journal of Urban Design, 16, 489-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.586142
[31] The Outdoor Foundation (2012). Outdoor Recreation Participation Topline Report 2012. Boulder, CO: The Outdoor Foundation.
[32] Thompson, F. (2010). Skateboard Jungle. Newcastle: The Newcastle Herald.
[33] Trainor, S., Delfabbro, P., Anderson, S., & Winefield, A. (2010). Leisure Activities and Adolescent Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 173-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.03.013
[34] Urban Design Protocol (2013). Geelong Youth Activity Area: Urban Design Protocol Case Study, Creating Places for People. http://www.urbandesign.gov.au/casestudies/geelong.aspx
[35] Vivoni, F. (2009). Spots of Spatial Desire Skateparks, Skateplazas, and Urban Politics. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 33, 130-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193723509332580
[36] Vivoni, F. (2013). Waxing Ledges: Built Environments, Alternative Sustainability, and the Chicago Skateboarding Scene. Local Environment, 1-14.
[37] Weller, S. (2006). Skateboarding Alone? Making Social Capital Discourse Relevant to Teenagers’ Lives. Journal of Youth studies, 9, 557-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13676260600805705
[38] Weston, P. (2010). Skate Parks a Haven for Drugs, Violence and Gangs in Southeast Queensland. Queensland: The Sunday Mail.
[39] Woolley, H. (2009). Every Child Matters in Public Open Spaces. Securing Respect: Behavioural Expectations and Anti-Social Behaviour in the UK (pp. 97-118). A. Millie. Bristol: The Policy Press.
[40] Woolley, H., & Johns, R. (2001). Skateboarding: The City as a Playground. Journal of Urban Design, 6, 211-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13574800120057845

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.