Competition of Squirreltail with Cheatgrass at Three Nitrogen Levels

Abstract

Squirreltail (Elymus elymoides [Raf] Swezey) can grow in cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) stands, and has reduced the biomass production of cheatgrass in its immediate vicinity. A field experiment was conducted to determine: 1) if competition for nitrogen resources occurs between seedlings of squirreltail and seedlings of cheatgrass, under low, medium, and high nitrogen levels, and; 2) if competition for nitrogen resources in the seedling stage is a mechanism that allows squirreltail to establish in cheatgrass stands. Five accessions of squirreltail were each seeded with a single accession of cheatgrass in a cultivated field near Ephraim, Utah in the fall of 1995 and again in 1996. A completely randomized strip-plot design with 3 replications was used including the 5 joint seedings as well as pure seedings of each accession of both species. Three nitrogen levels representing high, medium (control), and low were applied. The study was replicated over 2 years in different areas of the same field. Harvests of above-ground biomass of squirreltail and cheatgrass within each treatment were conducted in July of 1996 and 1997. Using biomass production as a measure of efficient nitrogen use, cheatgrass competed for and used nitrogen resources more efficiently than squirreltail when nitrogen was not limiting. All squirreltail accessions were able to compete for and use nitrogen more efficiently than cheatgrass when there was low availability of nitrogen. Some accessions of squirreltail competed for nitrogen resources more efficiently than others both in the control and at the reduced nitrogen level. White Rocks and Sublette squirreltail accessions were the best competitors with cheatgrass at the low nitrogen level reducing the cheatgrasss biomass by as much as 75% and 67% respectively. An intermediate competitor with cheatgrass was the Gunnison accession. The Washakie and Pueblo accessions were poor competitors with cheatgrass at low nitrogen levels.

Share and Cite:

Stevens, A. , Anderson, V. and Fugal, R. (2014) Competition of Squirreltail with Cheatgrass at Three Nitrogen Levels. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 990-996. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.57112.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Tilman, G.D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure, Monographs in Population Biology—17. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[2] Parish, J.A.D. and Bazzaz, F.A. (1985) Ontogenetic Niche Shifts in Old-Field Annuals. Ecology, 66, 1296-1302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939182
[3] Bazzaz, F.A. (1979) The Physiological Ecology of Plant Succession. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics, 10, 351-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.002031
[4] Berendse, B., Oudhof, H. and Bol, J. (1987) A Comparative Study on Nutrient Cycling in Wet Heathland Ecosystems I. Litter Production and Nutrient Loss from the Plant. Oecologia, 74, 174-184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00379357
[5] Aerts, R. and Berendse, F. (1988) The Effect of Increased Nutrient Availability on Vegetation Dynamics in Wet Heathlands. Vegetation, 76, 63-69.
[6] Chapin, F. (1988) Ecological Aspects of Plant Nutrition. In: Tinker, P. B. and Lauchli, A., Eds., Advances in Plant Nutrition, Vol. 3, Praeger Publishers, New York, 161-191.
[7] McLendon, T. and Redente, E.F. (1991) Nitrogen and Phosphorus Effects on Secondary Succession Dynamics on a Semi-Arid Sagebrush Site. Ecology, 72, 2016-2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941556
[8] McLendon, T. and Redente, E.F. (1992) Effects of Nitrogen Limitation on Species Replacement Dynamics during Early Secondary Succession on a Semiarid Sagebrush Site. Oecologia, 91, 312-317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00317618
[9] Fredrick, B.A. and Klein, D.A. (1994) Nitrogen Effects on Rhizosphere Processes of Range Grasses from Different Successional Seres. Plant and Soil, 161, 241-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00046395
[10] Richard, C.E. and Redente, E.F. (1995) Nitrogen and Phosphorus Effects on Blue Grama and Buffalograss Interactions. Journal of Range Management, 48, 417-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4002245
[11] Hunt, H.W., Ingham, E.R., Coleman, D.C., Elliott, E.T. and Read, C.P.P. (1988) Nitrogen Limitation of Production and Decomposition in Prairie, Mountain Meadow, and Pine Forest. Ecology, 69, 1009-1016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941256
[12] Lamb, D. (1980) Soil Nitrogen Mineralization in a Secondary Rain Forest Succession. Oecologia, 47, 257-263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00346829
[13] Monsen, S.B., Stevens, R. and Shaw, N.L. (2004) Restoring Western Ranges and Wildlands. General Technical Report, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins.
[14] Clary, W.P. (1975) Ecotypic Adaptation in Sitanion hystrix. Ecology, 56, 1407-1415.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1934707
[15] Stevens, A.R. (1997) Squirreltail (Elymus elymoides) Establishment and Competition with Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum). Ph.D. Dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo.
[16] DeCatanzaro, J.B. and Beauchamp, E.G. (1985) The Effect of Some Carbon Substrates on Denitrification Rates and Carbon Utilization in Soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1, 183-187.
[17] Beauchamp, E., Trevors, J.T. and Paul, J.W. (1989) Carbon Sources for Bacterial Denitrification. Advances in Soil Science, 10, 113-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8847-0_3
[18] Swenson, J.L., Beckstrand, D., Erickson, D.T., McKinley, C., Shiozaki, J.J. and Tew, R. (1970) Soil Survey of Sanpete Valley Area, Utah. United States Department of Agriculture—Soil Conservation Service, Salt Lake City.
[19] Mack, R.N. (1981) Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into Western North America: An Ecological Chronicle. Agro-Ecosystems, 7, 145-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3746(81)90027-5
[20] Freed, R.D. (1985) MSTAT-C Statistical Package, Version 2.0.0. Crop and Soil Science Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
[21] Bilbrough, C.J. and Caldwell, M.M. (1997) Exploitation of Springtime Ephemeral N Pulses by Six Great Basin Plant Species. Ecology, 78, 231-243.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.