A Systems Biological Perspective of Cellular Stress-Directed Programmed Cell Death


Each eukaryotic cell of multicellular organisms must be able to maintain its integrity by sensing both external and internal stimuli. The primary goal of the generated response mechanism is to drive back the system to the former or to a new homeostatic state. Moreover, the response has to provide an accurate survival-or-death decision to avoid any “misunderstanding” and its unwanted consequences. New data revealed that a systems-level crosstalk of molecular networks has an essential role in achieving the correct characteristic of the response. Although many molecular components of these processes already have been revealed, several elements and regulatory connections of crosstalk are still missing. These “gaps” of the complex control networks make hardly impossible to present comprehensive models. Therefore we approach the questions from a systems biology aspect by combining the experimental results with the special technique of mathematical modelling. In this short report we discuss some novel and preliminary data gained by this approach on the crosstalk between life and death decisions under cellular stress, to get a systems biological view of these networks.

Share and Cite:

Kapuy, O. , Lizák, B. , Stiller, I. and Bánhegyi, G. (2014) A Systems Biological Perspective of Cellular Stress-Directed Programmed Cell Death. Computational Molecular Bioscience, 4, 28-34. doi: 10.4236/cmb.2014.41003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Tyson, J.J., Chen, K.C. and Novak, B. (2003) Sniffers, Buzzers, Toggles and Blinkers: Dynamics of Regulatory and Signaling Pathways in the Cell. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 15, 221-231.
[2] Biggar, S.R. and Crabtree, G.R. (2001) Cell Signaling Can Direct Either Binary or Graded Transcriptional Responses. The EMBO Journal, 20, 3167-3176.
[3] Tyson, J.J. and Novak, B. (2010) Functional Motifs in Biochemical Reaction Networks. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 61, 219-240.
[4] Tyson, J.J., Chen, K. and Novak, B. (2001) Network Dynamics and Cell Physiology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2, 908-916.
[5] Tyson, J.J., Csikasz-Nagy, A. and Novak, B. (2002) The Dynamics of Cell Cycle Regulation. BioEssays, 24, 1095-1109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.10191
[6] Novak, B., et al. (2010) Regulated Protein Kinases and Phosphatases in Cell Cycle Decisions. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 22, 801-808.
[7] Tyson, J.J., et al. (2011) Dynamic Modelling of Oestrogen Signalling and Cell Fate in Breast Cancer Cells. Nature Reviews Cancer, 11, 523-532.
[8] Arkin, A.P. and Schaffer, D.V. (2011) Network News: Innovations in 21st Century Systems Biology. Cell, 144, 844-849.
[9] Nurse, P. and Hayles, J. (2011) The Cell in an Era of Systems Biology. Cell, 144, 850-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.045
[10] Taylor, R.C., Cullen, S.P. and Martin, S.J. (2008) Apoptosis: Controlled Demolition at the Cellular Level. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 9, 231-241.
[11] Elmore, S. (2007) Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death. Toxicologic Pathology, 35, 495-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926230701320337
[12] Zhang, T., Brazhnik, P. and Tyson, J.J. (2009) Computational Analysis of Dynamical Responses to the Intrinsic Pathway of Programmed Cell Death. Biophysical Journal, 97, 415-434.
[13] Kapuy, O., et al. (2013) A Cellular Stress-Directed Bistable Switch Controls the Crosstalk between Autophagy and Apoptosis. Molecular BioSystems, 9, 296-306.
[14] Levine, B. and Kroemer, G. (2008) Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Disease. Cell, 132, 27-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018
[15] Wirawan, E., et al. (2012) Autophagy: For Better or for Worse. Cell Research, 22, 43-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.152
[16] Ravikumar, B., et al. (2010) Regulation of Mammalian Autophagy in Physiology and Pathophysiology. Physiological Reviews, 90, 1383-1435.
[17] Hay, N. and N. Sonenberg (2004) Upstream and Downstream of mTOR. Genes & Development, 18, 1926-1945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1212704
[18] Wang, S.Y., et al. (2011) Core Signaling Pathways of Survival/Death in Autophagy-Related Cancer Networks. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 43, 1263-1266.
[19] Levine, B. and Klionsky, D.J. (2004) Development by Self-Digestion: Molecular Mechanisms and Biological Functions of Autophagy. Developmental Cell, 6, 463-477.
[20] Maiuri, M.C., et al. (2007) Self-Eating and Self-Killing: Crosstalk between Autophagy and Apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 8, 741-752.
[21] Eisenberg-Lerner, A., et al. (2009) Life and Death Partners: Apoptosis, Autophagy and the Cross-Talk between Them. Cell Death Differ, 16, 966-975.
[22] Gordy, C. and He, Y.W. (2012) The Crosstalk between Autophagy and Apoptosis: Where Does This lead? Protein Cell, 3, 17-27.
[23] Ogata, M., et al. (2006) Autophagy Is Activated for Cell Survival after Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 26, 9220-9231.
[24] Xu, Y., Yuan, J. and Lipinski, M.M. (2013) Live Imaging and Single-Cell Analysis Reveal Differential Dynamics of Autophagy and Apoptosis. Autophagy, 9, 1418-1430.
[25] Appenzeller-Herzog, C. and Hall, M.N. (2012) Bidirectional Crosstalk between Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and mTOR Signaling. Trends in Cell Biology, 22, 274-282.
[26] Walter, P. and Ron, D. (2011) The Unfolded Protein Response: From Stress Pathway to Homeostatic Regulation. Science, 334, 1081-1086.
[27] Watanabe, R., Wei, L. and Huang, J. (2011) mTOR Signaling, Function, Novel Inhibitors, and Therapeutic Targets. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52, 497-500.

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.