Land Suitability Analysis for Orange & Pineapple: A Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach Using Geo Spatial Technology

Abstract

Land evaluation procedure given by FAO for soil site suitability for various land utilization types for rainfed agriculture has been used to assess the land suitability for khasi mandarin orange and pineapple in East Khasi Hills District of Meghalaya. The database on soil and land use/land cover was generated from IRS-P6 remote sensing satellite data, soil survey and laboratory analysis of soil samples to perform an integrated analysis in the Geographic Information System environment. Different soil chemical parameters and physical parameters were considered to evaluate soil site suitability for orange & pineapple. Different thematic layers were derived from soil map by using ArcGIS software. Subsequently all of them were overlaid and integrated in GIS environment and suitability criteria was applied to the resulted composite map and generated land suitability map for orange and pineapple. The result indicated that the soil sites of the study area are highly to marginally suitable for mandarin orange whereas it is marginally suitable for pineapple. The study reveals that highly suitable areas for orange are found in the Cherapunjee and Mawsynram area that covers 34.5 Sq.Km areas. Moderately suitable (37% of TGA) and marginally suitable (24% of TGA) areas are found only because of slope constraint (8%-30% slope). The hills with deep gorges and ravines on the southern portion of the district is found not suitable for orange plantation because of steep slopes (>30%) and stoniness. Land suitability analysis for pineapple showed that 81% area of total geographical area of the district is marginally suitable and 19% area is not suitable to support the crop. The district is marginally suitable because of topography (slope and erosion), soil fertility (base saturation and CEC) and climate.

Share and Cite:

P. Das and S. Sudhakar, "Land Suitability Analysis for Orange & Pineapple: A Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach Using Geo Spatial Technology," Journal of Geographic Information System, Vol. 6 No. 1, 2014, pp. 40-44. doi: 10.4236/jgis.2014.61005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] G. Addeo, G. Guastadisegni and M. Pisante, “Land and Water Quality for Sustainable and Precision Farming,” World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, Madrid, 2001.
[2] T. R. Nisar Ahamed, K. Gopal Rao and J. S. R. Murthy, “GIS-Based Fuzzy Membership Model for Crop-Land Suitability Analysis,” Agricultural Systems, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2000, pp. 75-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00036-0
[3] A. A. Mustafa, S. Man, R. N. Sahoo, A. Nayan, K. Manoj, A. Sarangi and A. K. Mishra, “Land Suitability Analysis for Different Crops,” Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 2011.
[4] FAO, “A Framework for Land Evaluation,” Soils Bulletin 32, Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, 1976.
[5] T. N. Prakash, “Land Suitability Analysis for Agricultural Crops: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach,” International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, 2003, pp. 6-13.
[6] J. Dumanski, M. Phipps and E. Huffman, “A Study of Relationships between Soil Survey Data and Agricultural Land Use Using Information Theory,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 67, No. 1, 1987, pp. 95-102.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjss87-009
[7] C. Sys, V. Ranst, J. Debaveye and F. Beernaert, “Land Evaluation Part III, Crop Requirements,” Agricultural Publication No. 7, ITC Ghent, 1993.
[8] T. Bhattacharyya, C. Mandal and S. N. Deshmukh, “Soils and Land Use Pattern in Part of Western Maharashtra,” Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1992, pp. 513-520.
[9] R. S. Murthy, L. Venkataratnam and R. K. Saxena, “Application of Remote Sensing Techniques for Land Evaluation and Classification for Agriculture,” In: B. L. Deekshatulu and Y. S. Rajan, Eds., Remote Sensing, Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore, 1984, pp. 83-94.
[10] N. Ramarao, “Conformity Analysis of Cotton Crop Using Remote Sensing and GIS,”
GISdevelopment.net, 2001.
[11] D. Sarkar, S. K. Gangopadhyay and A. K. Sahoo, “Soil Resource Appraisal towards Land Use Planning Using Satellite Remote Sensing and GIS—A Case Study in Patloinala Microwatershed, District Purulia, West Bengal,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2006, pp. 245-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02990653
[12] S. P. Ghosh, A. N. Verma, S. Govind and R. P. Medhi, “Mandarin Orange Decline in North Eastern Hills Region and Its Control,” Research Bulletin 16, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Shillong, 1980.
[13] T. Das Pratibha, T. Liagi and G. Jonali, “Mapping of Potential Citrus Decline Areas of Umling Block of Ribhoi District Using RS and GIS Technique,” Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2009, pp. 317-324.
[14] “Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Crop Forecaster Reports: Year 1993 to 2003,” Goverment of Meghalaya, Shillong, 2003.
[15] T. M. Lillisand and R. W. Keifer, “Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation,” John Wiley, Singapore, 2004.
[16] IARI, “Soil Survey Manual. All India Soil and Land Use Survey,” Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 1970.
[17] FAO, “FAO Guidelines for Soil Profile Description,” Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, 1977.
[18] SLUSI, “Annual Report,” Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 2008.
[19] FAO, “Guidelines: Land Evaluation for Rainfed Agriculture,” Soil Bulletin No. 52, Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, 1983.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.