Brain Response to Aversive Taste for Investigating Taste Preference

Abstract

To clarify the intrinsic food preference mechanism, we investigated brain neurophysiological responses to unpleasant gustatory stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and near-infrared hemoencepalogram (NIR-HEG) simultaneously. A conventional delayed response task based on Go/Nogo paradigm was adopted to extract real brain response components from spontaneous background signals. We found excessive evoked EEG potential responses to both bitter and sour stimuli, while we didn’t find excessive changes in purified water condition. These potentials appeared before P3, hence, they potentially predicted unconscious attention to the gustatory stimuli. We also identified a late contingent negative variation (CNV) and corresponding P3 for sour stimulus. In addition, NIR-HEG responses showed relative changes for every stimulus and we considered that these NIR-HEG signal changes were attributed to the prefrontal cortex activity for regulating negative emotional valence against aversive tastes typically including sour and bitter. In spite of limitation to timing accuracy of taste presentations, the early markers found in this study could be fundamentals for investigating individual food preference.

Share and Cite:

C. Hu, Y. Katagiri, Y. Kato and Z. Luo, "Brain Response to Aversive Taste for Investigating Taste Preference," Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2014, pp. 43-48. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2014.41006.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] T. R. Bashore and M. van der Molen, “Discovery of P300: A Tribute,” BiolPsychology, Vol. 32, No. 2-3, 1991, pp. 467-475.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(91)90007-4
[2] K. Ohla, N. A. Busch and J. N. Lundström, “Time for Taste: A Review of the Early Cerebral Processing of Gustatory Perception,” Chemosencs Percept, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012, pp. 87-99.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12078-011-9106-4
[3] M. A. Smith, L. M. Riby, S. I. Sunram-Lea, J. A. van Eekelen and J. K. Foster, “Glucose Modulates Event-Related Potential Components of Recollection and Familiarity in Healthy Adolescents,” Psychopharmacology (Berlin), Vol. 205, No. 1, 2009, pp. 11-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-009-1509-4
[4] L. M. Riby, J. McLaughlin and D. M. Riby, “Lifestyle, Glucose Regulation and the Cognitive Effects of Glucose Load in Middle-Aged Adults,” British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 100, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1128-1134.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508971324
[5] F. Koppelstaetter, T. D. Poeppel, C. M. Siedentopf, et al., “Does Caffeine Modulate Verbal Working Memory Processes? An fMRI Study,” Neuroimage, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2008, pp. 492-499.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.037
[6] S. Kozawa and Y. Fukuda, “Standard Physiology,” Igakushoin, Tokyo, 2009, p. 294.
[7] T. Picton and S. Hillyard, “Endogenous Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential,” In: T. Picton, Ed., Human Event-Related Potentials: EEG Handbook, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 361-426.
[8] W. Walter, R. Cooper, V. Aldridge, W. McCallum and A. Winter, “Contingent Negative Variation: An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain,” Nature, Vol. 203, No. 4943, 1964, pp. 380-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/203380a0
[9] N. E. Loveless and A. J. Sanford, “The Impact of Warning Signal Intensity on Reaction Time and Components of the Contingent Negative Variation,” Biological Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1975, pp. 217-226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(75)90021-6
[10] T. C. Weerts and P. J. Lang, “The Effects of Eye Fixation and Stimulus and Response Location on the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV),” Biological Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1973, pp. 1-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(73)90010-0
[11] R. Shiffrin and W. Schneider, “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory,” Psychological Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, 1977, pp. 127-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
[12] E. Damen and C. Brunia, “Is a Stimulus Conveying Task-Relevant Information a Sufficient Condition to Elicit a Stimulus-Preceding Negativity,” Psychophysiology, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1994, pp. 129-139.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01033.x
[13] C. Brunia and E. Damen, “Distribution of Slow-Potentials Related to Motor Preparation and Stimulus Anticipation in a Time Estimation Task,” Electroen-cephalagraphy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 69, 1988, pp. 234-243.
[14] B. G. Frost, R. A. Neill and B. Fenelon, “The Determinants of the Non-Motoric CNV in a Complex, Variable Foreperiod, Information Processing Paradigm,” Biological Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1988, pp. 1-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(88)90002-6
[15] J. J. Tecce, “Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and Psychological Processes in Man,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 77, No. 2, 1972, pp. 73-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0032177
[16] P. Chiu, N. Ambaby and P. Deldin, “Contingent Negative Variation to Emotional in- and Out-Group Stimuli Differentiated High- and Low-Prejudiced Individuals,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 16, No. 10, 2004, pp. 1830-1839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0898929042947946
[17] E. T. Rolls and T. R. Scott, “Central Taste Anatomy and Neurophysiology,” In: R. K. L. Doty, Ed., Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation, 2nd Edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2003, pp. 679-705.
[18] E. T. Rolls, T. R. Scott, Z. J. Sienkiewicz and S. Yaxley, “The Responsiveness o Fneurons in the Fontal Operculum Gustatoryd Cortex of the Macaque Monkeys Is Independent of Hunger,” The Journal of Physiology, Vol. 397, 1988, pp. 1-12.
[19] E. T. Rolls, Z. J. Sienkiewicz and S. Yaxley, “Hunger Modulates the Responses Togustatory Stimuli of Single Neurons in the Caudolateral Orbitofrontal Cortex of the Macaque Monkey,” European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1989, pp. 53-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00774.x
[20] M. L. Kringebach, I. E. de Araujo and E. T. Rolls, “Taste-Related Activity in the Human Dorsolater Pre-frontal Cortex,” Neuroimage, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2004, pp. 781-788.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.063
[21] M. Okamoto, H. Dan, A. K. Singh, F. Hayakawa, V. Jurcak, T. Suzuki, K. Kohyama and I. Dan, “Prefrontal Activity during Flavor Difference Test: Application of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Sensory Evaluation Studies,” Appetite, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2006, pp. 220-232.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.003
[22] C. Mizoguchi, T. Kobayakawa, S. Saito and H. Ogawa, “Gustatory Evoked Cortical Activity in Humans Studied by Simultaneous EEG and MEG Recording,” Chemical Senses, Vol. 27, No. 7, 2002, pp. 629-634.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/27.7.629
[23] M. Wada, “Evoked Responses to Taste Stimulation,” The International Tinnitus Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2005, pp. 43-47.
[24] K. Ohla, U. Toepel, J. le Coutre and J. Hudry, “Electrical Neuroimaging Reveals Intensity-Dependent Activation of Human Cortical Gustatory and Somatosensory Areas by Electric Taste,” Biological Psychology, Vol. 85, No. 3, 2010, pp. 446-455.
[25] C. Brunia and E. Damen, “Distribution of Slow-Potentials Related to Motor Preparation and Stimulus Anticipation in a Time Estimation Task,” Electroencephalagraphy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 69, 1988, pp. 234-243.
[26] J. O’Doherty, E. T. Rolls, S. Francis, R. Rowtel and F. McGlone, “Representation of Pleasant and Aversive Taste in the Human Brain,” Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 85, No. 3, 2001, pp. 1315-1321.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.