Natural radioactivity levels and radiation hazards for gypsum materials used in Egypt

DOI: 10.4236/ns.2014.61002   PDF   HTML     8,327 Downloads   18,480 Views   Citations


Radionuclides naturally occurring in building materials may significantly contribute to the annual doses to the public. For instance, familiar building materials such as the concrete and gypsum board have been reported to produce a dose of about 0.04 mSv per year for a typical person (NCRP 1987c). External as well as internal exposures are two pathways of radiation dose imparted to human beings from the building materials. As information on the radioactivity of such materials is lacking, the study of gypsum materials used in Egypt was carried out in order to estimate the annual dose to the Egyptian population due to natural radionuclides in building materials. During the study, 18 samples of commonly used gypsum raw materials were collected and measured. The activity concentrations were determined by gamma ray spectrometry. Their mean values were in the ranges of 499.29 ± 11.53 Bq·kg-1 for 40K, 91.97 ± 2.61 Bq·kg-1 for 226Ra, 37.62 ± 1.67 Bq·kg-1 for 238U and 42.27 ± 2.22 Bq·kg-1 for 232Th. The activity indexed Iγ for 18, different gypsum samples varied from 0.31 ± 0.03 to 2.3 ± 0.19 and the radium equivalent activity (Raeq), from 38.81 ± 1.68 to 324.7 ± 9.42. These values are lower than the limit of 370 Bq·kg-1 adopted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The average indoor annual effective gamma dose rate (DE) in (mSv/y) for the people, caused by the building materials of dwellings, was assessed for most commonly gypsum materials. It was estimated to be in the range from 0.10 ± 0.003 mSv/y to 0.74 ± 0.08 mSv/y. The internal and external hazard indices (Hin, Hex) and the absorbed dose rate in air D in each sample were evaluated to assess the radiation hazard for people living in dwelling made of the studied materials. The absorbed dose rate of indoor air in samples G1, G2, G11, G17 and G18 is less than the international recommended value which is 55 nGyh-1. While the absorbed dose rate for samples G3, G4, G5, G6, G7, G8, G9, G10, G12, G13, G14, G15 and G16 is higher than 55 nGyh-1, these samples are not acceptable for use as building materials.

Share and Cite:

Korna, A. , Fares, S. and El-Rahman, M. (2014) Natural radioactivity levels and radiation hazards for gypsum materials used in Egypt. Natural Science, 6, 5-13. doi: 10.4236/ns.2014.61002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Gypsum Association (2002) Annual gypsum board shipments & industry capacity. Gypsum Association, Washington DC.
[2] Mineral Information Institute (2001) Look around… Everything is made from something. Mineral Information Institute Poster, Denver.
[3] European Commission (1999) Radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials. Radiation Protection Report RP-112, European Commission, Luxembourg.
[4] El-Taher, A. (2010) Gamma spectroscopic analysis and associated radiation hazards of building materials used in Egypt. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 138, 158-165.
[5] Jeambrun, M., Pourcelot, L., Mercat, C., Boulet, B. and Loyen, J. (2012) Study on transfers of uranium, thorium and decay products from grain, water and soil to chicken meat and egg contents. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14, 2170-2180.
[6] Jonsson, M. (2010) Collimation technique for HPGedetector gamma spectrometry in intense radiation fields, Master of Science Thesis, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund.
[7] Ebaid, Y.Y. (2010) Use of gamma-ray spectrometry for uranium isotopic analysis in environmental samples. Romanian Journal, 55, 69-74.
[8] Amrani, D. and Tahtat, M. (2001) Natural radioactivity in Algerian building materials. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 54, 687-689.
[9] Erdtmann, G. and Soyka, W. (1979) The gamma of the radionuclide: Tables for applied gamma ray spectrometry. Verlag Chemic, New York.
[10] Langmuir, D. (1978) Uranium deposits, mineralogy and origin. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
[11] Mustonen, R., Pennanen, M., Annanmaki, M. and Oksanen, E. (1999) Enhanced radioactivity of building materials. Final Report of the Contract No 96-ET-003 for the European Commission, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, (STUK), Finland.
[12] Mollah, A.S., et al. (1996) The natural radioactivity of some building materials used in Bangladesh. Health Physics, 50, 849-851.
[13] International Atomic Energy Vienna (IAEA) (1994) Calibration of dosimeters used in radio therapy. Technical Reports Series No. 374.
[14] Turhan, S. (2008) Assessment of the natural radioactivity and radiological hazards in Turkish cement and its raw materials. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99, 404-414.
[15] Nour, K. (2005) Measurements of natural radioactivity in building materials in Qena City, Upper Egypt. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 83, 91-99.
[16] Stoop, P., et al. (1998) Results of the second dutch national survey on radon in dwellings. RIVM, Bilthoven, Report 610058006.
[17] Yu, K.N., et al. (1992) Indoor radon and environmental gamma radiation in Hong Kong. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 40, 259-263.
[18] Roelofs, L.M.M. and Scholten, L.C. (1994) The effect of aging, humidity, and fly-ash additive on the radon exhalation from concrete. Health Physics, 67, 266.
[19] Stranden, E., Kolstad, A.K. and Lind, B. (1984) The Influence of moisture and temperature on radon exhalation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 7, 55-58.
[20] Kovler, K., et al. (2005) Radon exhalation of cementitious materials made with coal fly ash: Part 1—Scientific background and testing of the cement and fly ash emanation. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 82, 321.
[21] Beck, H.L., De Campo, J. and Gogolak, C. (1972) In situ Ge(Li) and NaI(Tl) gamma-ray spectrometry, HASL-258. Environmental Measurements Laboratory, US Department of Energy (DOE), New York.
[22] Yu, K.N., Guan, Z.J., Stokes, M.J. and Young, E.C.M. (1992) The assessment of the natural radiation dose committed to the Hong Kong people. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 17, 31-48.
[23] United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and effects of ion-izing radiations. 2000 Report to the General Assembly with Annex B: Exposures from Natural Sources of Radiation, UNSCEAR, New York.
[24] Colgan, P.A., Organo, C., Hone, C. and Fenton, D. (2008) Radiation doses received by the Irish population. Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland, Dublin.
[25] Baykara, O., Karatepe, S. and Dogru, M. (2011) Assessments of natural radioactivity and radiological hazards in construction materials used in Elazig, Turkey. Radiation Measurements, 46, 153-158.
[26] Rizzo, S., Brai, M., Basile, S., Bellia, S. and Hauser, S. (2001) Gamma activity and geochemical features of building materials: Estimation of gamma dose rate and indoor radoon levels in Sicily. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 55, 259-265.
[27] Hayumbu, P., Zaman, M.B., Luhaba, N.C.H., Munsanje, S.S. and Nuleya, D. (1995) Natural radioactivity in Zambian building materials collected from Lusaka. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 199, 229-238.
[28] ICRP (1991) Annals of the ICRP, 1990. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
[29] Beretka, J. and Mathew, P.J. (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and byproducts. Health Physics, 48, 87-95.
[30] European Commission (EC) (1999) Radiation protection 112. Radiological Protection Principles Concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials, DirectorateGeneral Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection.
[31] ICRP (1994) Protection against Rn-222 at home and at work. Publication No. 65, Annals of the ICRP, 23, Pergamon, Oxford.
[32] Khan, K., Aslam, M., Orfi, S.D. and Han, H.M. (2002) Norm and associated radiation hazards in bricks fabricated in various locations of the North-West Frontier Province (Pakistan). Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 58, 59-66.
[33] Komura, K. (1997) Challenge to detection limit of environmental radioactivity. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Environmental Radiation, Tsuruga, Fukui, 20 October 1997, 56-75.
[34] Adams, J.A.S. and Weaver, C.E. (1958) Thorium to uranium ratios as indications of sedimentary processes: Example of concept of geochemical facies. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 42, 387-430.
[35] Macfarlane, P.A., Whittemore, D.O., Townsend, M.A., Doventon, J.H., Hamilton, V.J., Coyle III, W.G., Wade, A., Macpherson, G.L. and Black, R.D. (1989) The Dakota aquifer program annual report, FY89. Appendix B. Kansas Geological Survey, Open-File Report 90-27.
[36] Doventon, J.H. and Prensky, S.E. (1992) Geological applications of wireline logs: A synopsis of developments and trends. Log Analyst, 33, 286-303.
[37] Hussein, A.H., Abdel Monem, A.A., Mahdy, M.A., ElAassy, I.E. and Dabbour, G.M. (1992) On the genesis of surficial uranium occurrences in west central Sinai, Egypt. Ore Geology Reviews, 7, 125-134.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.