A Factorial Validation of Knowledge-Sharing Motivation Construct
Qinxuan Gu, Yingting Gu
DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2011.41009   PDF    HTML     8,222 Downloads   13,606 Views   Citations


While there is increasingly strategic importance in knowledge, it is facing new challenges to manage knowledge effectively. The paper studies the motivational construct model for knowledge sharing from the perspective of content theories and social motivation theories. The data collected by using the questionnaire survey from a variety of industries was analyzed on the basis of interviews and pretest. The results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed the motivational construct model for knowledge sharing was comprised of existence motivation, relatedness motivation, growth motivation and norm motivation. The results extended the perspectives for knowledge sharing motivation and provided theoretical evidences for facilitating knowledge sharing behavior.

Share and Cite:

Q. Gu and Y. Gu, "A Factorial Validation of Knowledge-Sharing Motivation Construct," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2011, pp. 59-65. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2011.41009.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] L. Argote and P. Ingram, “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis of Competitive Advantage in Firms,” Organizatianal Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 82, No. 5, 2000, pp. 150-169. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
[2] I. Nonaka and N. Konno, “The Concept of ‘Ba’: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1998, pp.1-15.
[3] R.M. Grant, “Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm,” Strategy Management Journal, Vol. 17, Winter Special Issue, 1996: pp. 109-122.
[4] G. Szulanski, “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, Winter Special Issue, 1996, pp. 27-43.
[5] M. Alavi and D.E. Leidner, “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2001, pp. 107-136. doi:10.2307/3250961
[6] A. Cabrera and E. F. Cabrera, “Knowledge-sharing Dilemmas,” Organization Studies, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2002, pp. 687-710. doi:10.1177/0170840602235001
[7] K. Stott and A.Walker, “Teams Teambuilding: the Manager’s Complete Guide to Teams in Organizations,” Prentice Hall, New York, 1995.
[8] H. Hall, “Input-friendliness: Motivating Knowledge Sharing Across Intranets,” Journal of Information Science, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2001, pp. 139-146. doi:10.1177/016555150102700303
[9] K. M. Bartol and A. Srivastava, “Encouraging Knowledge sharing: the Role of Organizational Reward Systems,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2002, pp. 64-77. doi:10.1177/107179190200900105
[10] N. R. Quigley, P. Tesluk, E. Locke and K. Bartol, “A Multilevel Investigation of Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance,” Organizational Science, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2007, pp. 71-88.
[11] A. H. Maslow, “Towards a Psychology of Being,” Van Nostrand, New York, 1968.
[12] C. P. Alderfer, “Existence, Relatedness and Growth,” Free Press, New York, 1972.
[13] D. C. McClelland, “Human Motivation, Cambridge,” Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.
[14] G. Herzberg, “Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure,” Van Nostrand Reinbold, New York, 1966.
[15] P. Hendricks, “Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on Motivation for Knowledge Sharing,” Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1999, pp. 91-100. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199906)6:2<91::AID-KPM54>3.0.CO;2-M
[16] T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak, “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.
[17] C., Moorman and A.S. Miner, “Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory,” Annual Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1998, pp. 698-723.
[18] R.G. Geen, “Social Motivation,” Pediatrics, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1991, pp. 377-399.
[19] J. L. Coleman, Jr., “Comparison of Depositional Elements of an Ancient and a ‘Modern’ Submarine Fan Complex: Early Pennsylvanian Jackfork and Late Pleistocene Mississippi Fans (abs.),” AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 74, 1990, p. 631.
[20] D. Feldman, “The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1984, pp. 47-53. doi:10.2307/258231
[21] P. Podsakoff and D. Organ, “Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects,” Journal of Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1986, pp. 531-544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
[22] K.G. Joreskog and D. Sorborm, “LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language,” Scientific Software, Chicago, 1993.
[23] R.P. McDonald and M.R. Ho, “Principles and Practice in Reporting Structural Equation Analysis,” Psychological Methods, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2002, pp. 64-82.doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.