[1]
|
American Academy of Pediatrics (2001). Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics, 107, 423-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.2.423
|
[2]
|
Ando, M., & Ueno, M. (2010). Analysis of the advantages of using tablet PC in e-learning. 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Nagaoka. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2010.42
|
[3]
|
Animoca (2012). 50 Androids march to school for training day. http://www.animoca.com/en/2012/05/50-androids-march-to-school-for-training-day/
|
[4]
|
Baker, R. D. (2010). Comparing the readability of text displays on paper, e-book readers, and small screen devices. Ph.D. Dissertation, Denton: University of North Texas.
|
[5]
|
BBC News (2000). Gates wants laptop for every pupil. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/627182.stm
|
[6]
|
Bordbar, F. (2010). English teachers’ attitudes toward computer-assisted language learning. International Journal of Language Studies, 4, 179206.
|
[7]
|
Broos, A. (2005). Gender and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8, 21-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21
|
[8]
|
Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., & Colomina, R. (2010). Situated uses of ICT and mediation of joint activity in a primary education instructional sequence. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 517-540.
|
[9]
|
Dror, I. E. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16, 215-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/p&c.16.2.02dro
|
[10]
|
Firth, N. (2012). Tablet PCs preserve indigenous knowledge. New Scientist Magazine, 2869. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428696.400-tablet-pcs-preserve-indigenous-knowledge.html
|
[11]
|
Gasparini, A. A., & Culén, A. L. (2012). Tablet PCs–An assistive technology for students with reading difficulties? The Fifth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI 2012), Valencia. http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=achi_2012_2_20_20083
|
[12]
|
Goldstein, E. B. (2011). Cognitive psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
|
[13]
|
Grace, K. E. (2011). Comparing the ipad to paper: Increasing reading comprehension in the digital age. M.D. Thesis, Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University.
|
[14]
|
Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2006). Electronic books: Children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 583-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00640.x
|
[15]
|
House, R. (2012). The inappropriateness of ICT in early childhood: Arguments from philosophy, pedagogy, and developmental research. In S. Suggate, & E. Reese (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Childhood Education and Development (pp. 105-120). London: Routledge
|
[16]
|
Hui, A. N. N., & Lau, S. (2010). Formulation of policy and strategy in developing creativity education in four Asian Chinese societies: A policy analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 215-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01334.x
|
[17]
|
Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30, 390-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640471211241663
|
[18]
|
Jones, T., & Brown, C. (2011). Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4, 5-22.
|
[19]
|
Kang, Y. Y., Wang, M. J. J., & Lin, R. (2009). Usability evaluation of E-books. Displays, 30, 49-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2008.12.002
|
[20]
|
Lucas, B. (2001). Creative teaching, teaching creativity and creative learning. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in Education (pp. 35-44). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
|
[21]
|
Matthew, K. (1997). A comparison of the influence of interactive CDROM story books and traditional print storybooks on reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 29, 263275.
|
[22]
|
Ozok, A. A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2008). A comparative study between tablet and laptop PCs: User satisfaction and preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 329-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447310801920524
|
[23]
|
Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., McPake, J., Stephen, C., & Adey, C. (2011). Parents, pre-schoolers and learning with technology at home: Some implications for policy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 361-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00432.x
|
[24]
|
Ravichandran, P., & de Bravo, B. F. (2010). Young children and screen time (television, DVDs, computer). National Research Center for Women & Families. http://www.center4research.org/2010/05/young-children-and-screen-time-television-dvds-computer/
|
[25]
|
Sheppard, D. (2011). Reading with iPads–The difference makes a difference. Education Today, 11, 12-15.
|
[26]
|
Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Gilmore, A., & Jameson, M. (2012). Students’ self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 202-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.010
|
[27]
|
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174
|
[28]
|
Stewart, S. (2012). Reading in a technological world: Comparing the iPad to print. M.S. Thesis, Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University.
|
[29]
|
Vekiri, I. (2010). Boys’ and girls’ ICT beliefs: Do teachers matter? Computers & Education, 55, 16-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.013
|
[30]
|
Vryzas, K., & Tsitouridou, M. (2002). Children and computers: Greek parents’ expectations. Educational Media International, 39, 285-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980210166053
|
[31]
|
Wheeler, S. (2001). Information and communication technologies and the changing role of the teacher. Journal of Educational Media, 26, 7-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135816500120069292
|