Share This Article:

Swimming Performance: A Strategy to Evaluate Motor Dysfunction after Brain Ischemia in Mice

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:145KB) PP. 584-590
DOI: 10.4236/jbbs.2013.38062    3,048 Downloads   4,382 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

We have previously reported that sequential common artery sectioning (SCAS) in mice produces a reproducible pattern of mortality, extensive brain damage and a wide range of measurable neurobehavioral alterations that include motor incoordination and forelimb flexion. The present study describes a comprehensive method to assess motor functional outcome after brain ischemia produced by SCAS using swimming behavior. We found that after the second artery occlusion the time for completion of the swimming task significantly increased and the swimming pattern alterations observed in the ischemic mice showed no evidence of recovery (up to 96 h). We view the swimming performance strategy described here as a sensitive, simple and economic procedure to assess motor performance after brain ischemia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

C. Gómez, M. Delgado-García, J. Santiago-Mejía, R. Ventura-Martínez, L. Parra-Gámez, J. González-Ríos and R. Rodríguez, "Swimming Performance: A Strategy to Evaluate Motor Dysfunction after Brain Ischemia in Mice," Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, Vol. 3 No. 8, 2013, pp. 584-590. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2013.38062.

References

[1] M. Ginsberg, “Neuroprotection for Ischemic Stroke: Past, Present and Future,” Neuropharmacology, 2008.
[2] A. R. Green and A. Shuaib, “Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Stroke,” Drug Discovery Today, Vol. 11, No. 15/16, 2006, pp. 681-693.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2006.06.001
[3] J. Minnerup, B. A. Sutherland, A. M. Buchan and C. Kleinscmitz, “Neuroprotection for Stroke: Current Status and Future Perspectives,” International Journal of Molecular Science, Vol. 13, 2012, pp. 11753-11772.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911753
[4] V. E. O’Collins, M. R. Macleod, G. A. Donnan, L. L. Horky, B. H. van der Worp and D. W. Howells, “1026 Experimental Treatments in Acute Stroke,” Annals of Neurology, Vol. 59, 2006, pp. 467-477.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.20741
[5] G. A. Donnan, “Acute Stroke Therapies: Some Unexpected Challenges,” International Journal of Stroke, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2007, pp. 235-239.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2007.00156.x
[6] I. M. Macrae, “Preclinical Stroke Research-Advantages and Disadvantages of the Most Common Rodent Models of Focal Ischaemia,” British Journal of Pharmacology, Vol. 164, 2011, pp. 1062-1078.
[7] F. Block, “Global Ischemia and Behavioral Deficits,” Progress in Neurobiology, Vol. 58, 1999, pp. 279-285.
[8] J. Lubjuhn, A. Gastens, G. von Wilpert, P. Bargiotas, O. Hermann, S. Murikinati, T. Rabie, H. Marti, I. Amend and T. G. Hampton, “Functional Testing in a Mouse Stroke Induced by Occlusion of the Distal Middle Cerebral Artery,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 184, 2009, pp. 95-103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.07.029
[9] R. Rodríguez, I. Rodríguez-Boscán, D. Lugo-Sira, H. Vidrio, E. Hong, M. Medina and I. Herrera, “Bilateral Sequential Common Carotid Artery Sectioning in Mice as a New Model for Testing Neuroprotective Drugs,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 9, 2000, pp. 45-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1052-3057(00)33693-X
[10] R. Haobam, K. M. Sindhu, G. Chandra and K. P. Mohanakumar, “Swim-Test as a Function of Motor Impairment in MPTP Model of Parkinson’s Disease: A Comparative Study in Two Mouse Strains,” Behavioral Brain Research, Vol. 163, 2005, pp. 159-167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.04.011
[11] R. Rodríguez, J. Santiago-Mejía, C. Gomez, E. Ramírez-SanJuan, “A Simplified Procedure for the Quantitative Measurement of Neurological Deficits after Forebrain Ischemia in Mice,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 147, 2005, pp. 22-28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.02.013
[12] I. Q. Whishaw, J. C. Cassel and L. E. Jarrard, “Rats with Fimbria-Fornix Lesions Display a Place Response in a Swimming Pool: A Dissociation between Getting There and Knowing Where,” Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1995, pp. 5779-5788.
[13] A. Bekoff and W. Trainer, “The Development of Interlimb Coordination during Swimming in Postnatal Rats,” Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 83, 1979, pp. 1-11.
[14] L. Enthoven, S. Dalm, E. R. de Kloet and M. S. Oitzl, “Swim Posture of Mice Does Not Affect Performance in the Water Maze,” Brain Research, Vol. 1003, 2004, pp. 36-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2003.10.074
[15] E. Gisel, M. Gruenthal and S. Finger “Swimming as a Method for Assessing Motor Cortex Integrity in the Rat,” Brain Research, Vol. 239, 1982, pp. 649-654.
[16] T. H. J. Burne, A. N. B. Johnston, J. J. McGrath and A. Mackay-Sim, “Swimming Behavior and Post-Swimming Activity in Vitamin D Receptor Knockout Mice,” Brain Research Bulletin, Vol. 69, 2006, pp. 74-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.10.014
[17] S. Stoltz, J. L. Humm and T Schallert, “Cortical Injury Impairs Contralateral Forelimb Immobility during Swimming: A Simple Test for Loss of Inhibitory Motor Control,” Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 106, 1999, pp. 127-132.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00100-X
[18] I. Q. Whishaw, A. J. Nonneman and B. Kolb, “Environmental Constraints on Motor Abilities Used in Grooming, Swimming and Eating by Decorticate Rats,” Journal of Comparative Physiology Psychology, Vol. 95, No. 5, 1981, pp. 792-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0077835
[19] C. Gomez, J. Santiago-Mejía, R. Ventura-Martínez and R. Rodríguez, “The Sunflower Seed Test: A Simple Procedure to Evaluate Forelimb Motor Dysfunction after Brain Ischemia,” Drug Development Research, Vol. 67, 2006, pp. 752-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ddr.20117
[20] J. B. Bederson, L. H. Pitts, M. Tsuji, M. C. Nishimura and H. Bartkowski, “Rat Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion: Evaluation of the Model and Development of a Neurologic Examination,” Stroke, Vol. 17, 1986, pp. 472-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.17.3.472
[21] A. C. DeVries, R. J. Nelson, R. J. Traystman and P. D. Hurn, “Cognitive and Behavioral Assessment in Experimental Stroke Research: Will It Prove Useful?” Neuroscience Biobehavior Reviews, Vol. 25, 2001, pp. 325-342.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.