Indwelling Pleural Catheter Insertion Following Inefficient Thoracoscopic Decortication in Postpneumonic Empyema: Beneficial or Contraindicated?

Gabor Egri, Rakesh Krishnadas, Peter Froeschle

.
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK..

DOI: 10.4236/ojts.2013.34025                

Abstract

Video assisted thoracic surgery in advanced stage postpneumonic empyema aims for thorough debridement and washout of the pleural space followed by an attempt to release the entrapped lung (decortication). When the latter isn’t successful, and the patient is in a poor performance status, applying tube thoracostomy is the usual routine, to avoid conversion to thoracotomy and open decortication. Tube thoracostomy, however, is associated with complications necessitating further surgery, needs long term follow up and also entails quality of life distorting issues. To overcome these disadvantages, we instead inserted a PleurX® indwelling pleural catheter in four patients in the above situation. The method brought success (lung re-expansion and complete or partial pleurodesis) without the need for further surgery or quality of life problems in either patient. Although the use of the indwelling pleural catheter in infected pleural space is not recommended by manufacturers, we noted no complications.

Keywords

Pleural Empyema; VATS; Trapped Lung; Decortication; Indwelling Pleural Catheter

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	American Thoracic Society, Medical Section of the National Tuberculosis Association, “Management of Nontuberculous Empyema,” American Review of Respiratory Disease, Vol. 85, 1962, p. 935.
[2]	C. J. Wozniak, D. E. Paull, J. E. Moezzi, et al., “Choice of First Intervention Is Related to Outcomes in the Management of Empyema,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 87, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1525-1530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.028
[3]	S. P. Luh, M. C. Chou, L. S. Wang, J. Y. Chen and T. P. Tsai, “Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions or Empyemas,” Chest, Vol. 127, No. 4, 2005, pp. 1427-1432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.4.1427
[4]	R. W. Light, “Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema,” Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2006, pp. 75-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/pats.200510-113JH
[5]	B. Y. Kim, B. S. Oh, W. C. Jang, Y. I. Min, Y. K. Park and Y. C. Park, “Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Decortication for Management of Postpneumonic Pleural Empyema,” The American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 188, No. 3, 2004, pp. 321-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.009
[6]	G. Melloni, A. Carretta, P. Ciriaco, et al., “Decortication for Chronic Parapneumonic Empyema: Results of a Prospective Study,” World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2004, pp. 488-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7213-y
[7]	B. C. Tong, J. Hanna, E. M. Toloza, et al., “Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Decortication,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2010, pp. 220-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.021
[8]	M. M. Oken, R. H. Creech, D. C. Tormey, et al., “Toxicity and Response Criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group,” American Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 5, No. 6, 1982, pp. 649-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014
[9]	“ASA Physical Status Classification System,” American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2007. http://www.asahq.org/Home/For-Members/Clinical-Information/ASA-Physical-Status-Classification-System
[10]	C. A. Efthymiou, T. Masudi, J. A. C. Thorpe and K. Papagiannopoulos, “Malignant Pleural Effusion in the Presence of Trapped Lung. Five-Year Experience of PleurX Tunnelled Catheters,” Interactive CardioVasc Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2009, pp. 961-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2009.211516
[11]	H. E. Davies, N. M. Rahman, R. J. Parker and R. J. O. Davies, “Use of Indwelling Pleural Catheters for Chronic Pleural Infection,” Chest, Vol. 133, No. 2, 2008, pp. 546-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-1742