A Note to Investigate the Welfare: When the Upstream Firm Enters the Downstream Market ()
Abstract
To investigate the changes of welfare and the degree of exploitation
in consumer side when the upstream firm enters the downstream market, we
construct a quantity competition model to analyze the changes in consumers’ welfare
and the profits of upstream and downstream firms. The main findings of this
note are as follows: The markup has a negative effect in consumer’s
surplus and the degree of exploitation will deteriorate when the upstream firm
goes into the other market. In addition, the profits in the firm which expands
his production scale to downstream will decline when the markup level rises, but
with no obvious effect in original downstream firm.
Share and Cite:
C. Fu, L. Chou and S. Lin, "A Note to Investigate the Welfare: When the Upstream Firm Enters the Downstream Market,"
Modern Economy, Vol. 4 No. 11, 2013, pp. 790-793. doi:
10.4236/me.2013.411084.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1]
|
M. L. Katz, “The Welfare Effects of Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Intermediate Good Markets,” American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No, 1, 1987, pp. 154-167.
|
[2]
|
P. DeGraba, “Input Market Price Discrimination and the Choice of Technology,” American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No, 5, 1990, pp. 1246-1253.
|
[3]
|
P. DeGraba, “Input Market Price Discrimination and the Choice of Technology,” American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No, 5, 1990, pp. 1246-1253.
|
[4]
|
D. S. Sibley and D. L. Weisman, “Rising Rivals’ Costs: The Entry of an Upstream Monopolist into Downstream Markets,” Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1998, pp. 451-470.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(98)00012-2
|
[5]
|
G. Chemla, “Downstream Competition, Foreclosure and Vertical Integration,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2003, pp. 261-289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105864003766754224
|