Resisting the Palimpsest: Reclamation of the Female Cultural Body


The implicit politics of female body performativity are played out constantly within the liminality of socio-cultural space. Women need to be able to renegotiate the complexity of constructed and encoded gender expectations and representation in order to expand the contemporary narrow vision of femininity that interpellates all of us in an advertorial way.The most visceral component of corporeal semiotics is the skin which can, certainly in Post-modern and Post-colonial terms be seen as a liminal space, which according to Homi Bhabha, is a space for cultural hybridity, performativity and minority diatribes to exist. In order to negotiate prescribed notions of physical aesthetics and ideas of femininity and beauty, the skin can be used to perform the renegotiation of this encoded, fixed tablet of gender traditions. How that skin exists culturally requires inspection. Space unfolds to interaction (Massey, D) and if, as McLuhan stated, the medium is the message, then the skin and the body are the medium. People, more predominantly women, who use their skins as semiotic canvasses by being tattooed, actively choose to perform subverted notions of beauty and performativity and challenge the dominant culture through the ritual of tattooing.The female body is perennially rewritten by the hegemony of each historical period. By using tattooing as a process of reclamation, one can refuse to let one’s body be inscribed by cultural hegemonic texts and practices. Through tattooing, bodily reclamation can resist the palimpsest by marking one’s journey, ideologies and artistic tastes on one’s skin. According to William Blake and Edward Said, ‘the foundation of empire is art and science; remove them or degrade them, and the empire is no more’ (4; 87). By tattooing the body, this process resists engendered codes of behaviour, constructed aesthetics of beauty and of the imposition of cultural imperialism because there is already a fixed, irremovable narrative in place that is autonomous and not state sanctioned.This paper will examine notions of female cultural space, encoded gender expectations, performativity and aesthetic constructs to demonstrate that through the process of tattooing, alternative ideological positions that are not represented by the hegemony exist in a liminal space and occupy a vital but subordinated (and therefore categorised female) position. As a result, revolution becomes embodied and performed on the skin.

Share and Cite:

Hazel Shadrack, J. (2013) Resisting the Palimpsest: Reclamation of the Female Cultural Body. Art and Design Review, 1, 11-14. doi: 10.4236/adr.2013.12003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Althusser, L. (2008). On ideology. London: Verso.
[2] Ashcroft, B., & Ahluwalia, P. (1999). The paradox of identity. London: Routledge.
[3] Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1996). Post-colonial studies reader. London: Routledge.
[4] Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
[5] Brook, P. (1990). The empty space. London: Penguin.
[6] Culler, J. (2008). Deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Abingdon: Routledge.
[7] Gutman, M. (2008). Designing modern childhoods: History, space and the material culture of children. Newark: Rutgers University Press.
[8] Harper, D. (2013). Etymology of the term “Briton”.
[9] Jones, A. (2013). Made ink Britain.
[10] Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[11] Mifflin, M. (2013). Bodies of subversion: A secret history of women and tattoo. New York: Powerhouse Press.
[12] Ministry of Justice; Home Office (2013). An overview of sexual offending in England and Wales.
[13] Moseley, T. (2013). UKIP donor demitri marchessini says women wearing trousers is “Hostile Behaviour”.
[14] Penny, L. (2010). Meat market: Female flesh under capitalism. London: Zero Books.
[15] Rapaille, C. (1997). The culture code. New York: Broadway Publishing.
[16] Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work and the will to lead. New York: WH Allen.
[17] Williams, P., & Chrisman, L. (1994). Colonial discourse and post- colonial theory. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Winterson, J. (2013). 100 Years after the Suffragettes.
[18] Wood, D. (1988). Derrida and difference. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.