The Relationship between Students’ Approach to Learning and Lifelong Learning

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.411113   PDF   HTML     5,607 Downloads   8,201 Views   Citations


The current investigation proposes to analyse the relationship between learning, from the appropriation students’ make of the different ways of learning and studying, and their willingness to be involved in lifelong learning (LL) activities. The theoretical rationale is inscribed in the Biggs’ Theory (1987), concerning the student’s approach to learning, and under the guiding principle of LL. The concept of LL has been understood and formalised in a distinct way, translated into different educational policies, the practices of which must be empirically supported. We present a correlational study, with a sample of 163 Higher Education students. The approaches to learning were supported by the revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). To evaluate the involvement of students in LL activities, the contents of some items of the Lifelong Learning Questionnaire (Kirby, Knapper, Lamon, & Egnatoff, 2010) were used. The results obtained in the correlational analysis allow us to associate the deep approach to some characteristics of learners throughout their life, especially concerning the establishing of goals and the self-direction of learning, whereas the superficial approach is mainly associated with the adaptation of learning strategies. The practical implications of these results are discussed below.

Share and Cite:

Barros, R. , Monteiro, A. , Nejmedinne, F. & Moreira, J. (2013). The Relationship between Students’ Approach to Learning and Lifelong Learning. Psychology, 4, 792-797. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.411113.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2001). The revise two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Education Psychology, 71, 133-149.
[2] Biggs, J. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 73-86.
[3] Biggs J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian council for educational research. Hawthorn: Victoria.
[4] Biggs, J. B., & Kirby, J. R. (1983). Approaches to learning in universities and CAEs. Vestes, 27, 3-9.
[5] Centeno, V. (2011). Lifelong learning: A policy with a long past but a short history. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30, 133-150.
[6] Davis, C., Nunes, Marina, M. R., & Nunes, C. A. A. (2005). Metacognicao e sucesso escolar: Articulando teoria e prática. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 35, 205-230.
[7] DGES (2013). ECTS: European credit transfer system.
[8] Entwistle, N. (2010). Taking stock: An overview of key research findings. In J. Christensen Hughes, & J. Mighty (Eds.), Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 15-57). Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.
[9] Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
[10] Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: WW Norton & Company.
[11] Fontaine. A. M. (1990). Motivacao e realizacao escolar. In B. P. Campos (Ed.), Psicologia do desenvolvimento e da educacao de Jovens (pp. 93-132). Lisboa: Universidade Aberta.
[12] Garrison, D. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33.
[13] Godoy, S. (2009). Validacao para o Brasil da escala revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Ph.D. Thesis, Sao Paulo: Sao Paulo University.
[14] Jallade, J.-P. (2011). International approaches to education: A review of some major cooperative programmes. European Journal of Education, 46, 7-24.
[15] Jarvis, P. (2010). Inquiry journal of lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29, 397-400.
[16] Justicia, F., Pichardo, M., Cano, F., Berben, A., & De la Fuente, J. (2008). The revised two factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses at item level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 355-372.
[17] Kirby, J., Knapper, C., Lamon, P., & Egnatoff, W. (2010). Development of a scale to measure lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29, 291-302.
[18] Knapper, C. K., & Cropley, A. (2000). Lifelong learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
[19] Maroco, J., & Bispo, R. (2005). Estatística aplicada às ciências sociais e humanas. Lisboa: Climepsi.
[20] Pacheco, J. (2011). Discursos e lugares das competências em contexto de educacao e formacao. Porto: Porto Editora.
[21] Pires, A. (2007). Reconhecimento e validacao das aprendizagens experienciais. Sísifo/Revista de Ciências da Educacao, 2, 5-19.
[22] Preece, J. (2011). Research in adult education and lifelong learning in the era of CONFINTEA VI. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30, 99-117.
[23] Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflit. West Sussex: John Willey & Sons.
[24] Smith, M., & Pourchot, T. (1998). Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[25] Sternberg, R. (2009). Cognitive psychology (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
[26] Sternberg, R., & Grigorenko, E. (2000). Teaching for successful intelligence. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
[27] UNESCO (2010). Relatório global sobre aprendizagem e educacao de adultos. Brasília: Instituto da UNESCO para a Aprendizagem ao Longo da Vida (UIL).
[28] Vasconcelos, R., Almeida, L., & Monteiro, S. (2005). Métodos de estudo em alunos do 1° ano da universidade-métodos de estudo na Universidade. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 9, 195-202.
[29] Valadares, J., & Moreira, M. (2009). A teoria da aprendizagem significativa: Sua fundamentacao e implementacao. Coimbra: Almedina.
[30] Young, M. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self-regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 25-40.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.