The Historical Dimension of the US Dodd-Frank Bill and its Implications to the Financial Governance Reform in Emerging Markets

Abstract

After about three years of the sub-prime mortgage crisis, the American Congress passed its new financial supervision bill on July 15, 2010, which is called Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This act was then singed to be in effect by President Obama on July 21. This act is named as the most serious financial supervision act passed ever since the Great Depression in 1933. This paper systematically reviews and analyzes the background, major content, effect, and historical dimension of the bill, and on this basis, it presents some implications to the financial governance reform in emerging markets, such as the maintenance of a proper level of financial deregulation, the protection of interests of financial product consumers, the cultivation of ethical value and social responsibility of financial executives or government leaders, etc.

Share and Cite:

W. Zhu and S. Rui, "The Historical Dimension of the US Dodd-Frank Bill and its Implications to the Financial Governance Reform in Emerging Markets," iBusiness, Vol. 5 No. 3B, 2013, pp. 146-149. doi: 10.4236/ib.2013.53B031.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] “Bill Summary & Status - 111th Congress (2009- 2010)-H.R.4173-All Information-THOMAS (Library of Congress)”. Library of Congress. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR04173:@@@L&summ2=m&#major%20actions. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
[2] “Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act”-from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodd%E2%80%93Frank_Wall_Street_Reform_and_Consumer_Protection_Act. Retrieved October 5, 2010.
[3] “Obama to Sign Dodd–Frank Financial Regulatory Reform Bill Into Law Today,” The Washington Independent. July 21, 2010. http://washingtonindependent.com/92161/obama-to-sign-dodd-frank-financial-regulatory-reform-bill-into-law-today. Retrieved October 5, 2010.
[4] Peter S. Rose & Sylvia C. Hudgins, Bank Management & Financial Services. 7th edition and the English-Chinese bilingual edition. McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) Co and China Machine Press, 2007, pp. 31-62.
[5] Blair, E. Christine and R. M. Kushmeider, “Challenges of the Dual Banking System: The Funding of Bank Supervision,” FDIC Banking Review, Vol. 18, No. 1. 2006, pp. 1-21.
[6] Comptroller of the Currency. Comptroller’s Licensing Manual. Washington D.C., January, 2005
[7] X. Q. Wu, On the Handling of “Too Big to Fall” Problem from the US Financial Supervision Reform. China Finance, 2010- 16.
[8] W. W. Ying, The US Financial Supervision Reform Act and its Effect on the Global Financial Market. Accountant, 2010-8.
[9] W. Z. Zhu, On the Criteria and Mechanism for Commercial Banks’ CSR. Economic Management Press, 2009.
[10] L. Z. Son, et al., The Explanation of US Dodd-Frank Bill: Lessons and Implications for our Country’s Financial Supervision. Macro Economy Research, 2011-1.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.