Further Thoughts on Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information


We study the informational impacts of multilateral voluntary export restraints (henceforth VERs) in an international trade model with differentiated products [1]. We first show that with competing mechanisms, the two firms’ lying intentions are strategic complements and will increase with the degree of product differentiation. Next, we show that each government will design their VERs menus to allow for only partial revelation. Contrary to the single intervention case [2], a separating equilibrium where each country’s domestic firm truthfully reveals its private information does not exist under multilateral policy interventions. Finally, we demonstrate that trade retaliation, when the two governments’ VERs are positively related, will happen when the government believes that its domestic firm is more likely to be inefficient.

Share and Cite:

C. Fu and S. Ho, "Further Thoughts on Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information," Modern Economy, Vol. 4 No. 11, 2013, pp. 696-705. doi: 10.4236/me.2013.411075.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] H. H. Wang, C. Peng and H. Wu, “Tariffication and Welfare in a Differentiated Duopoly,” The World Economy, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2013, pp. 899-911.
[2] L. D. Qiu, “Optimal Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 36, No. 3-4, 1994, pp. 333-354.
[3] J. A. Brander and B. J. Spencer, “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1-2, 1985, pp. 83-100.
[4] J. Eaton, and G. Grossman, “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, No. 2, 1986, pp. 383-406.
[5] K. Wong, “Incentive Incompatible, Immiserizing Export Subsidies,” University of Washington Discussion Paper No. 9020, 1990.
[6] D. R. Collie and M. Hviid, “Export Subsidies as Signals of Competitiveness,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, No. 3, 1993, pp. 327-339.
[7] D. De Meza, “Export Subsidies and High Productivity: Cause or Effect,” Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1986, pp. 347-350.
[8] J. P. Neary, “Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 37, No. 3-4, 1994, pp. 197-218.
[9] S. Bandyopadhyay, “Demand Elasticities, Asymmetry and Strategic Trade Policy,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, 1997, pp. 167-177.
[10] A. Dixit, “A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1979, pp. 20-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003317
[11] N. Singh and X. Vives, “Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly,” The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1984, pp. 546-554.
[12] R. Harris, “Why Voluntary Export Restraints Are ‘Voluntary’,” The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1985, pp. 799-809.
[13] C. C. Mai and H. H. Wang, “Why Voluntary Export Restraints Are Voluntary: An Extension,” The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1988, pp. 877-882.
[14] R. A. De Santis, “Why Exporting Countries Agree to Voluntary Export Restraints: The Oligopolistic Power of the Foreign Supplier,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2003, pp. 247-263.
[15] A. Martina and W. Vergoted, “On the Role of Retaliation in Trade Agreements,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 76, No. 1, 2008, pp. 61-77.
[16] J. Peck, “A Note on Competing Mechanisms and the Revelation Principle,” Ohio State University, Mimeo, 1995.
[17] D. Martimort and L. Stole, “Communication Spaces, Equilibria Sets and the Revelation Principle under Common Agency,” University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, Discussion Paper STE019, 1997.
[18] P. McAfee, “Mechanism Design by Competing Sellers,” Econometrica, Vol. 61, No. 6, 1993, pp. 1281-1312.
[19] M. Peters, “On the Equivalence of Walrasian and Non-Walrasian Equilibria in Contract Markets,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, No. 2, 1997, pp. 241-265.
[20] M. Peters and S. Severinov, “Competition among Sellers Who Offer Auctions Instead of Prices,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 75, No. 1, 1997, pp. 141-179.
[21] S. L. Brainard and D. Martimort, “Strategic Trade Policy with Incomplete Informed Policymakers,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, 1997, pp. 33-65.
[22] L. G. Epstein and M. Peters, “A Revelation Principle for Competing Mechanisms,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 88, No. 1, 1999, pp. 119-160.
[23] A. Creane and K. Miyagiwa, “Information and Disclosure in Strategic Trade Policy,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2008, pp. 229-244.
[24] R. Myerson, “Optimal Coordination Mechanisms in Generalized Principal-Agent Problems,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1982, pp. 67-81.
[25] B. P. Rosendorff, “Voluntary Export Restraints, Antidumping Procedure, and Domestic Politics,” American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, 1996, pp. 544-561.
[26] J. Ishikawa, “Who Benefits from Voluntary Export Restraints?” Review of International Economics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1998, pp. 129-141.
[27] S. Berry, J. Levinsohn and A. Pakes, “Voluntary Export Restraints on Automobiles: Evaluating a Trade Policy,” American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, 1999, pp. 400-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.400
[28] R. C. Feenstra and T. R., Lewis, “Negotiated Trade Restrictions with Private Political Pressure,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 4, 1991, pp. 1287-1307.
[29] M. Spence, “Job Market Signaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 87, No. 3, 1973, pp. 355-374.
[30] J. A. Brander and P. Krugman, “A Reciprocal Dumping Model of International Trade,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 15, No. 3-4, 1983, pp. 313-321.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.