Exploring Self-Leadership across Eastern and Western Cultures

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2013.64027   PDF   HTML     3,515 Downloads   5,993 Views   Citations


The purpose of this study was to examine how culture influences the use of self-leadership strategies among Hong Kong and Australian students. Results revealed that significant cultural differences were found for some dimensions of self-leadership strategies. Chinese students reported greater use of self-reward, relation-based natural reward, individual-oriented and social-oriented evaluation of beliefs and assumption, whereas Australian students reported greater use of self-goal setting, and self-cueing. However, no cultural differences were found for the use of self-punishment, positive self-talk, visualizing successful performance as well as task-based natural rewards. Implications and future research are also discussed.

Share and Cite:

J. Ho and P. Nesbit, "Exploring Self-Leadership across Eastern and Western Cultures," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, 2013, pp. 241-249. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2013.64027.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. A. Conger and R. M. Kanungo, “The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice,” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1988, pp. 471-482.
[2] M. D. Ensley, K. M. Hmieleski and C. L. Pearce, “The Importance of Vertical and Shared Leadership within New Venture Top Management Teams: Implications for the Performance of Startups,” The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 217-231.
[3] C. P. Neck and J. D. Houghton, “Two Decades of Self-Leadership Theory and Research: Past Developments, Present Trends, and Future Possibilities,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2006, pp. 270-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663097
[4] C. C. Manz and C. P. Neck, “Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence,” 3rd Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2004.
[5] H. P. Jr. Sims and C. C. Manz, “Company of Heroes: Unleashing the Power of Self-Leadership,” Wiley, New York, 1996.
[6] C. P. Neck, G. Stewart and C. C. Manz, “Thought Self-Leadership as a Framework for Enhancing the Performance of Performance Appraisers,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 31, 1995, pp. 278-302.
[7] C. P. Neck and C. C. Manz, “Thought Self-Leadership: The Impact of Self-Talk and Mental Imagery on Performance,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, 1992, pp. 681-699.
[8] J. C. Alves, K. J. Lovelace, C. C. Manz, F. Matsupura, D. Toyasaki and K. Ke, “A Cross-Cultural Perspective of Self-Leadership,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2006, pp. 338-359.
[9] M. J. Neubert and J. C. Wu, “An Investigation of the Generalizability of the Houghton and Neck Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire to a Chinese Context,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2006, pp. 360-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663132
[10] G. Hofstede, “Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values,” Sage Publications, San Francisco, 1980.
[11] S. Georgianna, “Self-Leadership: A Cross-cultural Perspective,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2007, pp. 569-589.
[12] J. Ho and P. L. Nesbit, “A Refinement and Extension of the Self-Leadership Scale for the Chinese Context,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2009, pp. 450-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940910959771
[13] J. Ho, P. L. Nesbit, D. Jepsen and S. Demirian, “Extending Self-Leadership Research to the East: Measurement Equivalence of the Chinese and English Versions of the MSLQ,” Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2012, pp. 101-111.
[14] H. Markus and S. Kitayama, “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation,” Psychological Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, 1991, pp. 224-253.
[15] E. T. Higgins, “Beyond Pleasure and Pain,” American Psychologist, Vol. 52, No. 12, 1997, pp. 1280-1300.
[16] S. H. Heine, D. R. Lehman, H. R. Markus and S. Kitayama, “Is There a Universal Need for Positive Self-Regard?” Psychological Review, Vol. 106, No. 4, 1999, pp. 766-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
[17] A. Y. Lee, J. L. Aaker and W. L. Gardner, “The Pleasures and Pains of Distinct Self-construal: The Role of Interdependence in Regulatory Focus,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 6, 2000, pp. 1122-1134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1122
[18] E. Crowe and E. T. Higgins, “Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 69, No. 2, 1997, pp. 117-132.
[19] S. J. Heine, S. Kitayama, D. R. Lehman, T. Takata, E. Ide and C. Leung, “Divergent Consequences of Success and Failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of Self-Improving Motivations and Malleable Selves,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 4, 2001, pp. 599-615.
[20] S. E. Taylor and J. D. Brown, “Illusion and Well-being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No. 2, 1988, pp. 193-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
[21] D. Frey and D. Stahlberg, “Selection of Information after Receiving More or Less Reliable Self-threatening Information,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1986, pp. 434-441.
[22] S. J. Heine, “Constructing Good Selves in Japan and North America,” In: R. M. Sorrention, D. Cohen, J. M. Olson and M. P. Zanna, Eds., Culture and Social Behavior: The Tenth Ontario Symposium, Erlbaum, New York, 2005, pp. 115-143.
[23] D. D. Burns, “Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy,” William Morrow, New York, 1980.
[24] S. Heine and D. Lehman, “Culture, Self-Discrepancies, and Self-Satisfaction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 8, 1999, pp. 915-925.
[25] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior,” Plenum Press, New York, 1985.
[26] S. S. Iyengar and S. E. De Voe, “Rethinking the Value of Choice: Considering Cultural Mediators of Intrinsic Motivation,” In: V. Murphy-Berman and J. Berman, Eds., Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural Differences in Perspectives on Self, Vol. 49, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 2003, pp. 129-741.
[27] S. S. Iyengar and R. Lepper, “Rethinking the Value of Choice: A Cultural Perspective on Intrinsic Motivation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 76, No. 3, 1999, pp. 349-366.
[28] H. Kim and H. R. Markus, “Deviance or Uniqueness, Harmony or Conformity? A Cultural Analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 77, No. 4, 1999, pp. 785-800.
[29] D. Oyserman, H. M. Coon and M. Kemmelmeir, “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 128, No. 1, 2002, pp. 3-72.
[30] B. M. Byrne, “Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming,” Erlbaum, New York, 2001.
[31] R. E. Ployhart and F. L. Oswald, “Applications of Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis: Integrating Correlational and Experimental Approaches,” Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2004, pp. 27-65.
[32] S. Reise, K. Widaman and R. Pugh, “Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory: Two Approaches for Exploring Measurement Invariance,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 114, No. 3, 1993, pp. 552-566.
[33] J. B. Steenkamp and H. Baumgartner, “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1998, pp. 78-90.
[34] J. L. Arbuckle and W. Wothke, “Amos 4.0 User’s Guide,” Small Waters, Chicago, 1999.
[35] M. H. Bond, “Beyond the Chinese Face: Insights from Psychology,” Oxford University Press, Hong Kong, 1991.
[36] C. S. Dweck, “Self-Theories,” Psychology Press, Philadelphia, 1999.
[37] R. G. Tweed and D. R. Lehman, “Learning Considered within a Cultural Context: Confucian and Socratic Approaches,” American Psychologist, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2002, pp. 89-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.89
[38] H. W. Stevenson, S. Lee, C. Chen, M. Lummis, J. Stigler, L. Fan and F. Ge, “Mathematics Achievement of Children in China and the United States,” Child Development, Vol. 61, No. 4, 1991, pp. 1953-1966.
[39] G. L. Reglin and D. R. Adams, “Why Asian American High School Students Have Higher Grade Point Averages and SAT Scores than Other High School Students,” The High School Journal, Vol. 73, No. 3, 1990, pp. 143-149.
[40] F. Salili and M. K. Lai, “Learning and Motivation of Chinese Students in Hong Kong: A Longitudinal Study of Contextual Influences on Students’ Achievement Orientation and Performance,” Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2003, pp. 51-70.
[41] W. O. Lee, “The Cultural Context for Chinese Learners: Conception of Learning in Confucian Tradition,” In: D. A. Watkinsand and J. B. Biggs, Eds., The Chinese Learner: Cultural Psychological and Contextual influences, CERC and ACERC, Hong Kong, 1996, pp. 25-41.
[42] C. Tang and J. Biggs, “How Hong Kong Students Cope with Assessment,” In: D. A. Watkins and J. B. Biggs, Eds., The Chinese Learner: Cultural Psychological and Contextual Influences, CERC and ACERC, Hong Kong, 1996, pp. 25-41.
[43] J. Biggs, “Western Misperception of the Confucian Heritage Learning Culture,” In: D. A. Watkins and J. B. Biggs, Eds., The Chinese Learner: Cultural Psychological and Contextual Influences, CERC and ACERC, Hong Kong, 1996, pp. 45-67.
[44] J. L. Farh and B. S. Cheng, “A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations,” In: J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui and E. Weldon, Eds., Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, Macmillan, London, 2000, pp. 94-127.
[45] S. Oishi, E. F. Diener, R. E. Lucas and E. M. Suh, “Cross-Cultural Variations in Predictors of Life-Satisfaction: Perspective from Needs and Values,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 8, 1999, pp. 980-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511006
[46] T. M. Singelis, H. C. Triandis, D. P. S. Bhawuk and M. J. Gelfand, “Horizontal and Vertical Aspects of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement,” Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1995, pp. 240-275.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.