Logical Difficulty from Combining Counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell Theorems

Louis Sica

Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, CA & Burtonsville, MD, USA Inspire Institute Inc., Alexandria, VA, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/am.2013.410A3012                

Abstract

In eliminating the fair sampling assumption, the Greenberger, Horne, Zeilinger (GHZ) theorem is believed to confirm Bell’s historic conclusion that local hidden variables are inconsistent with the results of quantum mechanics. The GHZ theorem depends on predicting the results of sets of measurements of which only one may be performed. In the present paper, the noncommutative aspects of these unperformed measurements are critically examined. Classical examples and the logic of the GHZ construction are analyzed to demonstrate that combined counterfactual results of noncommuting operations are in general logically inconsistent with performed measurement sequences whose results depend on noncommutation. The Bell theorem is also revisited in the light of this result. It is concluded that negative conclusions regarding local hidden variables do not follow from the GHZ and Bell theorems as historically reasoned.

Keywords

HZ-Theorem; Bell-Theorem; Noncommutation; Counterfactual; Hidden Variables; Locality; Nonlocality

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	D. M. Greenberger, M. Horne and A. Zeilinger, “Going beyond Bell’s Theorem,” In: M. Kafatos, Ed., Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 69-72.
[2]	N. David Mermin, “Simple Unified Form for the Major No-Hidden-Variables Theorems,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 65, No. 27, 1990, pp. 3373-3376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3373
[3]	D. Home, “Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Physics,” Plenum Press, New York, 1997, p. 234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9808-1
[4]	A. Afriat and F. Selleri, “The Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox,” Plenum Press, New York, 1999, p. 121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0254-2
[5]	D. M. Greenberger, “GHZ (Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger) Theorem and GHZ States,” In: D. Greenberger, K. Hentschel and F. Weinert, Eds., Compendium of Quantum Physics, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2009, pp. 258-263.
[6]	L. Vaidman, “Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics,” In: D. Greenberger, K. Hentschel and F. Weinert, Eds., Compendium of Quantum Physics, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2009, pp. 132-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_40
[7]	H. Goldstein, “Classical Mechanics,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1980, p. 148.
[8]	R. B. Griffiths, “Consistent Histories,” In: D. Greenberger, K. Hentschel and F. Weinert, Eds., Compendium of Quantum Physics, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2009, pp. 117-122.
[9]	F. Mandl, “Quantum Mechanics,” John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, 1992, Chapter 5.
[10]	L. Sica, “Bell’s Inequalities I: An Explanation for Their Experimental Violation,” Optics Communications, Vol. 170, No. 1-3, 1999, pp. 55-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00417-4
[11]	L. Sica, “Bell’s Inequalities II: Logical Loophole in Their Interpretation,” Optics Communications, Vol. 170, No. 1-3, 1999, pp. 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00418-6
[12]	L. Sica, “Correlations for a New Bell’s Inequality Experiment,” Foundations of Physics Letters, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2002, pp. 473-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023920230595
[13]	L. Sica, “Bell’s Inequality Violation Due to Misidentification of Spatially Non-Stationary Random Processes,” Journal of Modern Optics, Vol. 50, No. 15-17, 2003, pp. 2465-2474.
[14]	J. Malley, “All Quantum Observables in a Hidden-Variable Model Must Commute Simultaneously,” Physical Review A, Vol. 69, No. 2, 2004, pp. 022118-1-022118-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022118
[15]	A. Papoulis and S. U. Pillai, “Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002, p. 387.
[16]	J. S. Bell, “Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987, p. 65.
[17]	L. Sica, “Logical Difficulty from Combining Counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell Theorems,” 2013. http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2013.MAR.R26.10
[18]	L. Sica, “Logical Difficulty from Combining Counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell Theorems,” arxiv:quant-ph/1202. 0841.