The Scientificalization and Vulgarization of Marxism in the 20th Century: A Critical Analysis on K. Popper’s Critique of Marxism

Fan Chang

doi:10.4236/ojpp.2013.34069

Home > Journals > Social Sciences & Humanities > OJPP

Open Journal of Philosophy > Vol.3 No.4, November 2013

The Scientificalization and Vulgarization of Marxism in the 20th Century: A Critical Analysis on K. Popper’s Critique of Marxism ()

Fan Chang

School of Marxism, Institution of Western Marxist Philosophy, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.34069 PDF HTML 12,354 Downloads 23,411 Views Citations

Abstract

Marxism was indeed vulgarized due to scientism in the 20th century, which even limits the development of Chinese social theories nowadays. This paper put forward the idea that it was serious misunderstanding to interpret Marx as prophet or inventor like empiricists who regard finding out eternal laws as the goal of science. In fact, Marx did not propose any so-called “natural laws of historical development”. He articulated that the only thing worth to do was to take note of what happened before his eyes and to become its mouthpiece. Thus, to understand science in the face of social practice, to analyze everything historically and never to thrust “eternal” laws in any era should be taken as the core of Marx’s new science, which is very important to China today.

Keywords

Kant; Hegel; Marx; Popper; Marxism; Science; Vulgarization

Share and Cite:

Chang, F. (2013). The Scientificalization and Vulgarization of Marxism in the 20th Century: A Critical Analysis on K. Popper’s Critique of Marxism. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 475-478. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.34069.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Althusser, L. (2003). Philosophy and politic: The writings of Louis Althusser. Beijing: People Publisher.
[2]	Bacon, F. (2000). The new organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164030
[3]	Chang, F. (2012). The real cause and meaning of unfinished Das Kapital. Academic Exchange, No. 6.
[4]	Hegel (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford University Press.
[5]	Kant (1949). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. London: The Open Court Publishing Company.
[6]	Lenin (1976). Lenin collected work (Vol. 38). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
[7]	Marx, K. (1975). Early writings. Penguin Books.
[8]	Marx, K. (1982). Capital (Vol. 1). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
[9]	Marx/Engels (1968). Marx and Engels correspondence. New York: In ternational Publishers.
[10]	Marx/Engels (1970). The German ideology. New York: International Publishers.
[11]	Marx/Engels (1975). Marx/Engels collected works (Vol. 5). New York: International Publishers.
[12]	Marx/Engels (1985). Marx/Engels collected works (Vol. 20). New York: International Publishers.
[13]	Marx/Engels (1989). MEGA (band 8). Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
[14]	Marx/Engels (2001). Marx/Engels collected works (Vol. 49). Moscow: Progress.
[15]	Ping, H. (2008). The determinism and indeterminism thought in Marx’s World Historical Theory. Philosophical Research, No. 3.
[16]	Popper, K. R. (1947). The open society and its enemies (Vol. II). London: George Routledge.
[17]	Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of sci entific knowledge. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
[18]	Russo, B. (1961). A history of western philosophy. London: George Allen.