Energy Efficient Packet-Duration-Value Based MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract

Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol consists of sets of rules that determine which node is allowed to access the transmission medium. It provides mechanism for collision avoidance such that interfering sensor nodes do not transmit at the same time. In the literature, researchers have proposed different MAC protocols with features aimed at improving energy efficiency and thereby prolonging the life of sensor nodes. Sensor MAC, Time-out MAC (T-MAC), Dynamic Sensor MAC (DSMAC), WiseMAC, Quorum-based MAC (Queen-MAC) and Traffic Adaptive Medium Access Protocol (TRAMA) are some examples of proposed MAC protocols. There is a duration field in each transmitted packet. The value of this field indicates how long it will take to complete the remaining packet transmission. In the current paper, a novel energy-efficient MAC protocol is proposed based on the use of duration value in transmitted packets to setup varying sleep/wake-up schedules for neighbouring nodes of the receiver. The effectiveness of this proposed Packet-Duration-Value-based MAC (PDV-MAC) protocol is tested via Simulation which is implemented in Visual C# and MATLAB. It is shown by the results obtained that the proposed MAC protocol can indeed be implemented in sensor nodes to improve energy efficiency in wireless sensor network.

Share and Cite:

A. M. Ajofoyinbo, "Energy Efficient Packet-Duration-Value Based MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks," Wireless Sensor Network, Vol. 5 No. 10, 2013, pp. 194-202. doi: 10.4236/wsn.2013.510022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] W. Ye, J. Heidemann and D. Estrin, “An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proceedings of the 21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2002), New York, June 2002, pp. 1567-1576.
[2] T. V. Dam and K. Langendoen, “An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proceedings of 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Los Angeles, November 2003, pp. 171-180.
[3] D. Yoo and S. S. Choi, “Medium Access Control with Dynamic Frame Length in Wireless Senor Networks,” Journal of Information Processing Systems, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2010, pp. 501-510.
[4] A. El-Hoiydi, “Spatial TDMA and CSMA with Preamble Sampling for Low Power Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Taormina, Italy, July 2002, pp. 685-692.
[5] A. El-Hoiydi and J. D. Decotignie, “WiseMAC: An Ultra Low Power MAC Protocol for the Downlink of Infra- structure Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication, Alexandra, 2004, pp. 244-251.
[6] A. El-Hoiydi, J. D. Decotignie, C. Enz and E. Le Roux, “Poster Abstract: WiseMAC: An Ultra Low-Power MAC Protocol for the WiseNET Wireless Sensor Network,” Proceedings of the 1st ACM SenSys Conference, Los Angeles, November 2003, pp. 302-303.
[7] V. Rajendran, K. Obrackza and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “Energy Efficient, Collision-Free Medium Access Control for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proceedings of ACM SenSys 2003, Los Angeles, November 2003, pp. 181-192.
[8] Q. Qi, H. Wu and L. Ji, “FDMA/TDMA Hybrid MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network,” Proceedings of SPIE Advanced Sensor Systems and Applications, Vol. 8561, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.999485
[9] E. Gholam Hossein, M. Reza, H. Mohammad, M. Yaghmaee and A. H. Seyed, “Queen-MAC: A Quorum-Based Energy Efficient Medium Access Control Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Computer Networks, Vol. 56, No. 8, 2012, pp. 2221-2236.
[10] K. Nguyen, Y. Ji and S. Yamada, “Low Overhead MAC Protocol for Low Data Rate Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, Vol. 2013, 2013, Article ID: 217159.
[11] Y. Wang, Q. Zhang and Y. Li; “Hybrid Traffic Oriented Energy Efficiency Access Strategy of Wireless Sensor Network,” Information Technology Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2013, pp. 264-275.
[12] R. Suneja and V. Jain, “Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks—A Review,” International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2013, pp. 21-24.
[13] A. Antonopoulos, C. Verikoukis, C. Skianis and O. B. Akan, “Energy Efficient Network Coding-Based MAC for Cooperative ARQ Wireless Networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2013, pp. 190-200.
[14] IEEE 802.15.4-2006; Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs).
[15] H. W. Tseng, S. H. Yang, P. Y. Chuang, E. H. Kuang Wu and G. H. Chen, “An Energy Consumption Analytic Model for a Wireless Sensor Networks,” ACM SIG-COMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2006, pp. 33-36.
[16] T. Ezzendine, M. Miladi and R. Bouallegue, “An En- ergy-Latency-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 13, 2009, pp. 816-821
[17] M. N. Halgamuge, M. Zukerman, K. Ramamohanarao and H. L. Vu, “An Estimation of Sensor Energy Consumption,” Progress in Electromagnetic Research B, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 259-295.
[18] J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler and K. Pister, “System Architecture Directions for networked sensors,” ASPLOS IX Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 193-204.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.