A Unified Theory of Mind-Brain Relationship: Is It Possible?

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.34065   PDF   HTML     12,645 Downloads   30,537 Views   Citations

Abstract

The mind-body relationship has vexed philosophers of mind for quite a long time. Different theories of mind have offered different points of view about the interaction between the two, but none of them seem free of ambiguities and questions. This paper attempts to use a mathematical model for mind-body relationship. The model may generate some questions to think about this relationship from the viewpoint of operator theory.

Share and Cite:

Belbase, S. (2013). A Unified Theory of Mind-Brain Relationship: Is It Possible?. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 443-450. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2013.34065.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Anderson, J. (2003). Visions of mind and body: A technological solution to the mind-body problem. England: The University of Reading.
[2] Armstrong, D. M. (1993). A materialist theory of the mind. New York: Routledge.
[3] Benedetti, G., Marchetti, G., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Fingelkurts, A. A. (2010). Mind operational semantics and brain operational architectonics: A putative correspondence. The Open Neuroimaging Journal, 4, 53-69.
[4] Bickle, J. (1997). Psychoneural reductionism: The new wave. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[5] Block, N. (1980). Introduction: What is functionalism? In N. Block (Ed.), Readings in philosophy of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 171-184). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[6] Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025900
[7] Churchland, P. (1988). Matter and consciousness (Revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[8] Churchland, P. S. (1989). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[9] Earley Sr., J. E. (2008). How philosophy of mind needs philosophy of chemistry. International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 14, 126.
[10] Feyerabend, P. (1963). Mental events and the brain. Journal of Philosophy, 40, 295-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2023030
[11] Goertzel, B. (1993). The structure of intelligence: A new mathematical model of mind. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4336-6
[12] Heil, J. (2000). Philosophy of mind: A contemporary introduction. New York: Routledge.
[13] Hendry, R. F. (2006). Is there downward causation in chemistry? In D. Baird, E. Scerri, & L. McIntyre (Eds.), Philosophy of chemistry: Synthesis of a new discipline (pp. 173-189). The Netherlands: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3261-7_9
[14] Howard, R. (2012). Dualism. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (Winter 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/dualism/
[15] Kapteina, H., & Zhang, C. L. (2008). Music therapy in the viewpoint of biophysics. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 5, 205-209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMIC.2008.023122
[16] Kulstad, M., & Carlin, L. (2008). Leibniz’s philosophy of mind. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/leibniz-mind/
[17] Lycan, W., & Pappas, G. (1972). What is eliminative materialism? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50, 149-159.
[18] Marchal, B. (2013). The computationalist reformulation of the mindbody problem. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.03.014
[19] Robinson, H. (2012). Dualism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/
[20] Stern, A. (1992). Matrix, logic, and mind: A probe into a unified theory of mind and matter. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Company Inc.
[21] Ward, L. F. (1894). A monistic theory of mind. The Monist, 4, 194-207.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27897135 http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/monist18944212

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.