A Novelty-Induced Change in Episodic (NICE) Context Account of Primacy Effects in Free Recall

Eddy J. Davelaar

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.

DOI: 10.4236/psych.2013.49099                

Abstract

Formal cognitive models of episodic memory assume that during encoding list items become associated with a changing context representation. However, this representation is recency-biased and thus can not account for primacy effects under conditions that prevent rehearsal. In this paper, it is hypothesized that one source underlying primacy effects is the detection of novelty. In three experiments, it is shown how novelty at the perceptual and semantic level can explain the full serial position function of first recall probabilities, including primacy effects. It is proposed that an item becomes distinctive due to increase in the change within a distributed episodic context representation, induced by novelty detection. The theory makes three assumptions. First, items become associated with a distributed context representation. Second, the context representation changes with item presentation. Third, the rate of contextual change is related to the perceptual and conceptual difference computed between the presented item and the previous item (or items in the buffer). This theory captures primacy effects in first recall probabilities without recourse to a rehearsal process and provides a mechanistic account of distinctiveness.

Keywords

Distinctiveness; Novelty-Detection; Episodic Context; Distributed Context; Contextual Change

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence, & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
[2]	Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1977). Recency re-examined. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
[3]	Baddeley, A. D., & Warrington, E. K. (1970). Amnesia and the distinction between long- and short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 176-189. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80048-2
[4]	Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 173-189. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90009-7
[5]	Brodie, D. A., & Murdock, B. B. (1977). Effects of presentation time on nominal and functional serial position curves of free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 185-200. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80046-7
[6]	Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539-576. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.539
[7]	Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.127
[8]	Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106, 551-581. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.551
[9]	Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of rehearsal in short term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 599-607. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80039-8
[10]	Davelaar, E. J., & Usher, M. (2002). An activation-based theory of immediate item memory. In J. A. Bullinaria, & W. Lowe (Eds.), Connectionist models of cognition and perception: Proceedings of the seventh neural computation and psychology workshop. Singapore City: World Scientific.
[11]	Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3-42. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.3
[12]	Davelaar, E. J., Tian, X., Weidemann, C. T., & Huber, D. E. (2011). A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 608-626. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0056-8
[13]	Debener, S., Herrman, C. S., Kranczioch, C., Gembris, D., & Engel, A. K. (2003). Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity. Neuroreport, 14, 683-686. doi:10.1097/00001756-200304150-00005
[14]	Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369-377. doi:10.1037/h0046888
[15]	Glenberg, A. M., Bradley, M. M., Kraus, T. A., & Renzaglia, G. J. (1983). Studies of long-term recency effect: Support for a contextually guided retrieval hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 231-255. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.2.231
[16]	Grossberg, S. (2012). Adaptive resonance theory: How a brain learns to consciously attend, learn, and recognize a changing world. Neural Networks, 37, 1-47. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.017
[17]	Henson, R. H. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The startend model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0685
[18]	Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 923-941. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.923
[19]	Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299. doi:10.1006/jmps.2001.1388
[20]	Howard, M. W., Fotedar, M. S., Datey, A. V., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2005). The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: Toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. Psychological Review, 112, 75-116. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.75
[21]	Hunt, R. R., & Lamb, C. A. (2001). What causes the isolation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1359-1366. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1359
[22]	Jang, Y., & Huber, D. E. (2008). Context retrieval and context change in free recall: Recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34, 112-127. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.112
[23]	Kirchoff, B. A., Wagner, A. D., Maril, A., & Stern, C. E. (2000). Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6173-6180.
[24]	Klein, K. A., Shiffrin, R. M., & Criss, A. H. (2007). Putting context in context. In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III. New York: Psychology Press.
[25]	Laming, D. (1999). Testing the idea of distinct storage mechanisms in memory. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 419-426. doi:10.1080/002075999399774
[26]	Laming, D. (2006). Predicting free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1146-1163. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1146
[27]	Mensink, G.-J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model of interfereence and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.434
[28]	Metcalfe, J., & Murdock, B. B. (1981). An encoding and retrieval model of single trial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 161-189. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90365-0
[29]	Murdock, B. B. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli. Psychological Review, 67, 16-31. doi:10.1037/h0042382
[30]	Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 64, 482-488.
[31]	Murdock, B. B. (1972). Short-term memory. In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press.
[32]	Nairne, J. S. (2002). The myth of the encoding-retrieval match. Memory, 10, 389-395. doi:10.1080/09658210244000216
[33]	Neath, I. (1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition. Memory & Cognition, 21, 689-698. doi:10.3758/BF03197199
[34]	Norman, K. A. & O’Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary learning systems Approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611-646. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611
[35]	Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14). New York: Academic Press.
[36]	Richardson, J. T. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). The effect of articulatory suppression in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 623-629. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80049-1
[37]	Rundus, D. (1971). An analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 63-77. doi:10.1037/h0031185
[38]	Rundus, D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Rehearsal procedures in free recall: A procedure for direct observation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 99-105. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80015-9
[39]	Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 20, 11-21. doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11
[40]	Sederberg, P. B., Gauthier, L. V., Terushkin, V., Miller, J. F., Barnathan, J. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2006). Oscillatory correlates of the primacy effect in episodic memory. NeuroImage, 32, 1422-1431. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.223
[41]	Shiffrin, R. (1970). Forgetting: Trace erosion or retrieval failure? Science, 168, 1601-1603. doi:10.1126/science.168.3939.1601
[42]	Shiffrin, R. M., & Cook, J. R. (1978). Short-term forgetting of item and order information. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 189-218. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90146-9
[43]	Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of primacy effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1589-1625. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1589
[44]	Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
[45]	Ward, G. (2002). A recency-based account of the list length effect in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 30, 885-892. doi:10.3758/BF03195774