Experimental Investigation of Dynamic Characteristics of Multilayer PU Foam Sandwich Panels

DOI: 10.4236/jmmce.2013.15031   PDF   HTML     5,555 Downloads   7,942 Views   Citations


In the present work the dynamic characteristics of Multilayer Polyurethane foam glass/fiber composite sandwich panels have been determined through Experimental Investigations. Using a Multilayer Polyurethane foam sandwich panel with rectangular cross-section, the natural frequencies, mode shapes and the damping ratio of sandwich panels were evaluated. Three types of boundary conditions were simulated namely, C-F-F-F (Clamped Free-Free-Free), C-F-C-F (Clam-ped-Free-Clamped-Free), C-C-C-C-(Clamped-Clamped-Clamped-Clamped). Experimental modal tests were conducted on sandwich panels with available polyurethane foam of densities 56 kg/m3, 82 kg/m3and 289 kg/m3.The traditional “strike method” has been used to measure vibration properties. The modal characteristics of the specimens have been obtained by studying their impulse response. Each specimen has been subjected to impulses through a hard tipped hammer which is provided with a force transducer and the response has been measured through the accelerometer. The impulse and the response are processed through a computer aided FFT Analyzing test system in order to extract the modal parameters. Finite Element modeling was carried out treating the facing and core as orthotropic with different elastic constants as recommended in the literature. The experimental results were validated with FEA and were found to be in good agreement.The results obtained through modal test on multilayer sandwich panels are presented. They indicate a significant variation in the dynamic parameters in case of multilayer sandwich panels for the same core density as compared to a monolayer sandwich panel.

Share and Cite:

S. Havaldar and R. Sharma, "Experimental Investigation of Dynamic Characteristics of Multilayer PU Foam Sandwich Panels," Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 5, 2013, pp. 201-206. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2013.15031.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] P. H. W. Tsang and P. A. Lagace, “Failure Mechanisms of Impact-Damaged Sandwich Panels under Uniaxial Compression,” 35th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Hilton Head, 18-20 April 1994, pp. 745-754.
[2] P. A. Lagace and J. E. Williamson, “Contribution of the Core and Facesheet to the Impact Damage Resistance of Composite Sandwich Panels,” 10th DOD/NASA/FAA Conference on Fibrous Composites in Structural Design, Hilton Head, April 1994, pp. II53-II74.
[3] M. F. Aly et al., “Experimental Investigation of the Dynamic Characteristics of Laminated Composite Beams,” International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics IJMME-IJENS, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 41-48.
[4] Z. K. Awad, T. Aravinthan and Z. G. Yan and F. Gonzalez, “Investigation of Frequency Characteristics of GFRP/ Phenolic Sandwich Beams,” Southern Region Engineering Conference, 11-12 November 2010, Toowoomba.
[5] J. E. Jam, B. Eftari and S. H. Taghavian, “Better Predicting the Dynamic Response of Sandwich Panels,” Plastic Research, Society of Plastics Engineers.
[6] Z. Li “Vibration and Acoustical Properties of Sandwich Composite Materials,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, 2006.
[7] J. Xiong, A. Vaziri, L. Ma, J. Papadopoulos and L. Z. Wu, “Compression and Impact Testing of Two-Layer Composite Pyramidal-Core Sandwich Panels,” Composite Structures, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2012, pp. 793-801.
[8] M. Matter, T. Gmür, J. Cugnoni and A. Schorderet, “Iden- tification of the Elastic and Damping Properties in Sandwich Structures with a Low Core-To-Skin Stiffness Ratio,” Composite Structures, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2011, pp. 331- 341. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.009
[9] Q. L. Liu and Y. Zhao, “Prediction of Natural Frequencies of a Sandwich Panel Using Thick Plate Theory,” Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2001, pp. 289-309.
[10] A. Shahdin, L. Mezeix, C. Bouvet, J. Morlier and Y. Gourinat, “Fabrication and Mechanical Testing of Glass Fiber Entangled Sandwich Beams: A Comparison with Honeycomb and Foam Sandwich Beams,” Composite Structures, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2009, pp. 404-412. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.003
[11] H. L. Fan, W. Yang and Q. Zhou, “Experimental Research of Compressive Responses of Multi-Layered Woven Textile Sandwich Panels under Quasi-Static Loading,” Com- posites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1151-1156. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.008
[12] K. P. Dharmasena, D. Queheillalt, H. N. G. Wadley, et al., “Dynamic Response of a Multilayerprismatic Structure to Impulsive Loads Incident from Water,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2009, pp. 632-643. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.06.002
[13] W. Hng, K. P. Dharmasena, Y. Chen, et al., “Compressive Response of Multilayered Pyramidal Lattices during Underwater Shock Loading,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1102-1114. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.009
[14] S. C. Mohanty, “Finite Element Modeling of a Multilayered Sandwich Beam with Viscoelastic Core for Vibration Analysis,” International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Control IPCSIT, Vol. 10, 2011, IACSIT Press.
[15] B. C. Nakra, “Vibration Control in Machines and Structures Using Viscoelastic Damping,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 211, No. 3, 1998, pp. 449-465. doi:10.1006/jsvi.1997.1317

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.