Volume of Derivative Trading, Enterprise Value, and the Return on Assets

DOI: 10.4236/me.2013.48055   PDF   HTML     3,435 Downloads   5,090 Views   Citations

Abstract

We study how the volume of derivatives trading is associated with the return on assets (ROA), as well as the enterprise value proxied by abnormal return (AR), before and after the US Financial Crisis. Results suggest that before the crisis, the volume of over-the-counter trading, which tends to be less strictly regulated and thus can be more flexibly applied, is positively associated with AR and ROA, while exchange trading is not. After the financial crisis, exchange trading, which is more heavily regulated and thus has lower credit risks, is positively associated with AR and ROA. This implies that the kinds of derivatives products having a positive or negative effect on the enterprise value of financial institutions may vary according to each period of the economy. Therefore, in full consideration of the above, it is recommended that more appropriate alternatives to the regulations and inspections should be provided for derivatives products and trading methods of financial institutions.

Share and Cite:

J. Yang, "Volume of Derivative Trading, Enterprise Value, and the Return on Assets," Modern Economy, Vol. 4 No. 8, 2013, pp. 513-519. doi: 10.4236/me.2013.48055.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] D. Ryu, J. Baek, J. Yang and J. Chae, “Derivatives Trading Volume and Abnormal Return,” Unpublished Manuscript, 2011.
[2] T. Kwon, R. Park and U. Chang, “Derivatives Use, Firm Value, Risk and Determinants: Evidence of Korean Firms,” Korean Journal of Futures and Options, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2011, pp. 335-362.
[3] A. Jalivand, “Why Firms Use Derivatives: Evidence From Canada,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1999, pp. 213-225. doi:10.1111/j.1936-4490.1999.tb00197.x
[4] T. Brunzell, M. Hansson and E. Liljeblom, “The Use of Derivatives in Nordic Firms,” European Journal of Finance, Vol. 17, No. 5-6, 2011, pp. 355-376. doi:10.1080/1351847X.2010.543836
[5] A. S. Ahmed, E. Kilic and G. J. Lobo, “Effects of SFAS 133 on the Risk Relevance of Accounting Measures of Banks’ Derivative Exposures,” Accounting Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, 2011, pp. 769-804. doi:10.2308/accr.00000033
[6] X. Fu and S. A. Heffernan, “The Effects of Reform on China’s Bank Structure and Performance,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1999, pp. 39-52. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.11.023

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.