Share This Article:

Change in pulse rate with Enviro Chip and dummy chip fixed on radiation emitting devices like mobile phones/computers/laptops of users—A double blind crossover study

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:444KB) PP. 805-811
DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2013.68098    3,213 Downloads   5,414 Views  

ABSTRACT

Use of Electronic gadgets such as mobile phones, computers/laptops constitutes an integral part of human day-to-day activity in offices and businesses. Therefore, their use cannot be stopped. These electronic gadgets emit electromagnetic radiations, which are believed to be hazardous to human health. World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group B). The Enviro Chip developed by Synergy Environics, India, is a radiation harmonizing chip which when fixed on electronic gadgets at specific locations claims to reduce stress level by reducing the pulse rate of users which may also result in improvement of other health parameters. In this study, we have tested the ability of the Enviro Chip to reduce pulse rate of people who may have developed high pulse rate due to prolonged use of electronic gadgets. This was the double blind crossover study conducted in 205 healthy volunteers having an average pulse rate of above 82 per Minute at Max Healthcare India. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the change in pulse rate over 14 measurements with the use of both the Enviro Chip and a Dummy chip from average pulse rate at baseline without the Placebo effect. The secondary objective was to evaluate the change in pulse rate gender-wise. Data analysis was done using Wilcoxon Sign Rank test. The study demonstrated statistical significant reduction in pulse rate over 14 measurements with the use of Enviro Chip in both male and female healthy volunteers (p < 0.001). Enviro Chip has a potential to reduce pulse rate of those people who have higher pulse rate due to prolonged use of high-end electronic gadgets. The testing was done on people using mobile phones and monitors/computers for long hours.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Poddar, A. , Rana, S. , Mittal, V. , Sabath, S. and Mahmood, D. (2013) Change in pulse rate with Enviro Chip and dummy chip fixed on radiation emitting devices like mobile phones/computers/laptops of users—A double blind crossover study. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 6, 805-811. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2013.68098.

References

[1] Hardell, L., Carlberg, M. and Hansson Mild, K. (2006) Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on the use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk of malignant brain tumors, diagnosed in 1997-2003. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 79, 630-639. doi:10.1007/s00420-006-0088-5
[2] Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., Soderqvist, F., Mild, K.H. and Morgan, L.L. (2007) Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumors: Increased risk associated with used for ≥10 years. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, 626-632. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.029751
[3] Khurana, V.G., Teo, C., Kundi, M., Hardell, L. and Carlberg, M. (2009) Cell phones and brain tumors: A review including long-term epidemiological data. Surgical Neurology, 72, 205-215. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2009.01.019
[4] Havas, M., Marrongelle, J., Pollner, B., Kelley, E., Rees, C.R.G. and Tully, L. (2010) Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4 GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system. European Journal of Oncology, 5, 273-291.
[5] Hyland, G.J. (2000) Physics and biology of mobile telephony. Lancet, 356, 1833-1836.
[6] Nageswari, K.S. (1990) biological effects of microwaves: A review. Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences (India), 26, 1-16.
[7] Rubin, G.J., Das Munshi, J. and Wessely, S. (2005) Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: A systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 224-232. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000155664.13300.64
[8] Genuis, S.J. and Lipp, C.T. (2012) Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: Fact or fiction-Science of the Total Environment, 414, 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.008
[9] Baan, R., Grosse, Y., Secretan-Lauby, B., El Ghissassi, F., Bouvard, V., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., et al. (2011) On behalf of the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. The Lancet Oncology, 7, 624-626. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70147-4
[10] Litovitz, T.A., Penafiel, L.M., Farrel, J.M., Krause, D., Meister, R. and Mullins, J.M. (1997) Bioeffects induced by exposure to microwaves are mitigated by superposition of ELF noise. Bioelectromagnetics, 18, 422-430. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1997)18:6<422::AID-BEM4>3.0.CO;2-4
[11] Litovitz, T.A., Krause, D., Montrose, C.J. and Mullins, J.M. (1994) Temporally incoherent magnetic fields mitigate the response of biological systems to temporally coherent magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 15, 399-409. doi:10.1002/bem.2250150504
[12] Ayeni, A.A., Braimoh, K.T. and Ayeni, O.B. (2011) Effect of GSM radiation on human pulse rate (Heart beat rate). Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2, 580-587.
[13] Kannel, W.B., Kannel, C., Paffenbarger Jr., R.S. and Cupples, L.A. (1987) Heart rate and cardiovascular mortality: The Framingham Study. American Heart Journal, 113, 1489-1494. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(87)90666-1
[14] Gillum, R.F., Makuc, D.M. and Feldman, J.J. (1991) Pulse rate, coronary heart disease, and death: The NHA-NES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. American Heart Journal, 121, 172-177. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(91)90970-S
[15] Shaper, A.G., Wannamethee, G., Macfarlane, P.W. and Walker, M. (1993) Heart rate, ischaemic heart disease, and sudden cardiac death in middle-aged British men. British Heart Journal, 70, 49-55. doi:10.1136/hrt.70.1.49
[16] Arnold, J.M., Fitchett, D.H., Howlett, J.G., Lonn, E.M. and Tardif, J.C. (2008) Resting heart rate: A modifiable prognostic indicator of cardiovascular risk and outcomes? Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 24, 9A-15A.
[17] Andrzejak, R., Poreba, R., Poreba, M., et al. (2008) The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. Industrial Health, 46, 409-417. doi:10.2486/indhealth.46.409
[18] Lai, H. and Singh, N.P. (1995) Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 16, 207-210. doi:10.1002/bem.2250160309
[19] Hardell, L., Mild, K.H. and Carlberg, M. (2003) Further aspects on cellular and cordless telephones and brain tumours. International Journal of Oncology, 22, 399.
[20] Adlkofer, F. (2004) REFLEX, risk evaluation of potential environmental hazards from low frequency electromagnetic field exposure using sensitive in vitro methods.
[21] Al-Khlaiwi, T. and Meo, S.A. (2004) Association of mobile phone radiation with fatigue, headache, dizziness, tension, and sleep disturbance in Saudi population. Saudi Medical Journal, 25, 732-736.
[22] Roosli, M., Moser, M., Baldinini, Y., Meier, M. and Braun-Fahrlander, C. (2004) Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure—A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 207, 141-50. doi:10.1078/1438-4639-00269
[23] Hardell, L., Carlberg, M. and Hansson Mild, K. (2012) Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiology, EPUB Ahead of Print. doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.11.001

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.