The keele curriculum model: A contemporary framework for designing an inter-professional technology enhanced nursing curriculum

Melanie Humphreys; Ian Wood; Carol D. Johnson; Pauline N. Walsh; Nicola Witton; Julie Green; Sarah Corkhill

doi:10.4236/ojn.2013.34048

Home > Journals > Medicine & Healthcare > OJN

Open Journal of Nursing > Vol.3 No.4, August 2013

The keele curriculum model: A contemporary framework for designing an inter-professional technology enhanced nursing curriculum ()

Melanie Humphreys, Ian Wood, Carol D. Johnson, Pauline N. Walsh, Nicola Witton, Julie Green, Sarah Corkhill

University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Clinical Education Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2013.34048 PDF HTML XML 5,338 Downloads 7,905 Views Citations

Abstract

This paper outlines a curriculum model for contemporary programme design for the purpose of embedding educational innovation and technology within an inter-professional nursing curriculum. It has been developed from work within the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Keele University during the re-write of both the nursing and midwifery curriculum. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) require approval of all recordable programmes every five years and as such the school took this review as an opportunity to explore the curriculum model currently in use and develop an approach that would facilitate the professional requirements of the programme alongside the embedding of innovative learning and teaching methodologies. The model springs from extensive application of contemporary pedagogy underpinning adult learning, and forces consideration of cognitive alignment within a multi-modal delivery framework [1]. The model builds upon the early work of Fowler and Mayes [2] and later work of Bird [3] who explored the antecedents and underpinning theory for success within online learning experiences. This model has greater reach; having strategic fit for acontemporary “technology enhanced learning” application within further and higher education [4], whilst ensuring the achievement of given professional standards [5].

Keywords

Nursing; Curriculum; Inter-Professional; Technology-Enhanced; Model; Keele

Share and Cite:

Humphreys, M. , Wood, I. , Johnson, C. , Walsh, P. , Witton, N. , Green, J. and Corkhill, S. (2013) The keele curriculum model: A contemporary framework for designing an inter-professional technology enhanced nursing curriculum. Open Journal of Nursing, 3, 358-362. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2013.34048.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Biggs, J.B. (2003) Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press, Buckingham.
[2]	Fowler, C. and Mayes, J. (2000) Learning relationships from theory to design. In: Squires, D., Conole G. and Jacobs, G., Eds., The Changing Face of Learning Technology, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, 39-50.
[3]	Bird, L. (2007) The 3 “C” design model for networkedcollaborative e-learning: A tool fornovice designers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 153-167.
[4]	Department of Health (2011) A framework for technology enhanced learning. The Stationery Office, London.
[5]	Nursing & Midwifery Council (2010) Standards for pre-registration nursing education. NMC, London.
[6]	Willis, P. (2012) Quality with compassion: The future of nurse education. Royal College of Nursing, London.
[7]	Giddens, J. F. and Brady, D. P. (2007) Rescuing nursing education from content saturation: The case for a concept-based curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education, 46, 65-69.
[8]	Littlejohn, A. and Pegler, C. (2007) Preparing for blended e-learning. Routledge, London.
[9]	Bradley, C. and Oliver, M. (2002) Developing e-learning courses for work-based learning, Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference, 7-11 May 2002, Honolulu. http://www2002.org/CDROM/alternate/703/index.html
[10]	Francis, R. (2013) Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS foundation trust public inquiry. The Stationary Office, London.
[11]	Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P. and Schmidt, H.G. (2009) Students’ conceptions of constructivist learning in different programme years and different learning environments. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 501-514. doi:10.1348/000709908X378117
[12]	Kala, S., Isaramalai, S. and Pohtong, A. (2010) Electronic learning and constructivism: A model for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 30, 61-66. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.002
[13]	Brandon, A. F. and All, A. C. (2010) Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31, 89-92
[14]	Beskine, D. (2009) Mentoring students: Establishing effective working relationships. Nursing Standard, 23, 35-40.
[15]	Pollard, K. (2009) Student engagement in inter-professional working in practice placement settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 2846-2856. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02608.x
[16]	Lathlean, J., Burgess, A. and Coldham, T. (2006) Experiences of service user and carer participation in health care education. Nurse Education Today, 26, 732-737. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.017
[17]	McGarry, J. and Thom, N. (2004) How users and carers view their involvement in nurse education. Nursing Times, 100, 36-39.
[18]	Schon, D. (1983) The reflective practitioner. Temple Smith, London.
[19]	Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[20]	Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (1985) Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan, London.
[21]	Cassidy, S. (2009) Interpretation of competence in student assessment. Nursing Standard, 23, 39-46.
[22]	Wellard, S.J., Bethune, E. and Heggen, K. (2007) Assessment of learning in contemporary nurse education: Do we need standardised examination for nurse registration? Nurse Education Today, 27, 68-72. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.04.002