Comparison of Iterative Wavefront Estimation Methods

DOI: 10.4236/opj.2013.32B022   PDF   HTML     3,699 Downloads   4,872 Views   Citations

Abstract

The iterative reconstruction methods of the wavefront phase estimation from a set of discrete phase slope measurements have been considered. The values of the root-mean-square difference between the reconstructed and original wavefront have been received for Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel, Successive over-relaxation and Successive over-relaxation with Simpson Reconstructor methods. The method with the highest accuracy has been defined.

Share and Cite:

Y. Pankratova, A. Larichev and N. Iroshnikov, "Comparison of Iterative Wavefront Estimation Methods," Optics and Photonics Journal, Vol. 3 No. 2B, 2013, pp. 86-89. doi: 10.4236/opj.2013.32B022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] O. Shanin, “Adaptive Optical Systems for Ultra-High Intensity Lasers,” Technosfera, Moscow, 2012.
[2] J. Porter and others, “Adaptive Optics for Vision Science,” Wiley-Interscience.
[3] D. Malacara, “Optical Shop Testing,” 3rd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, 1980.
[4] W. H. Southwell, “Wavefront Estimation from Wavefront Slope Measurements,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 70, No. 8, 2007.
[5] S. W. Bahk, “Highly Accurate Wavefront Reconstruction Algorithms over Broad Spatial-Frequency Bandwidth,” Optics Express, 2011.doi:10.1364/OE.19.018997
[6] A. S. Goncharov and A. V. Larichev, “Speckle Structure of A Light Field Scattered by Human Eye Retina,” Laser Physics, Vol. 17, No. 9, 2007. doi:10.1134/S1054660X07090095
[7] Y. Carmon and E. N. Ribak, “Phase Retrieval by Demodulation of A Hartmann-Shack Sensor”

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.