Share This Article:

How Do the Evolution and Innovation of Social Network Analysis Matter to Computer Science and Communications?

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:73KB) PP. 147-151
DOI: 10.4236/sn.2013.23013    3,416 Downloads   6,730 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of evolution and innovation in social network analysis to the paradigm of social networking. It explains how the development of sociological theory and the structural properties of social groups matter to computer science and communications. Authors such as Moreno, John Barnes and Harrison C. White provide evidence of a growing body of literature addressing the networking of people, organizations and communities to explain the structure of society. This perspective has passed from sociology to other fields, changing understandings of social phenomena. Social networks remain a potent concept for analyzing computer science and communications. This paper shows how and why this has occurred and examines substantive areas in which social network analysis has been applied—mainly how the advantages of graphic visualization and computer software packages have influenced SNA in different audiences and publics leading to the unfolding of social networking to different audiences and publics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Xerez, R. (2013) How Do the Evolution and Innovation of Social Network Analysis Matter to Computer Science and Communications?. Social Networking, 2, 147-151. doi: 10.4236/sn.2013.23013.

References

[1] L. Freeman, “The Development of Social Network Analysis,” Empirical Press, Vancouver, 2004.
[2] J. Moreno, “Who Shall Survive? Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychotherapy and Sociodrama,” Beacon House, Washington DC, 1934.
[3] H. J. Leavitt, “Some Effects of Communication Patterns on Group Performance,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 46, 1951, pp. 38-50. doi:10.1037/h0057189
[4] B. Malinowski, “Argonauts of the Western Pacific,” 9th Edition, Routledge, London, 2002.
[5] A. Radcliffe-Brown, “On Joking Relationships,” Journal of the International African Institute, Vol. 3, No. 13, 1940, pp. 195-210. doi:10.2307/1156093
[6] E. Bott, “Family and Social Network,” Tavistock, London, 1957.
[7] J. Barnes, “Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish,” Human Relations, No. 7, 1954, pp. 39-58. doi:10.1177/001872675400700102
[8] M. Santoro, “Framing Notes. An Introduction to Catnets,” Sociologica, 2008, pp. 1-20.
[9] J. Scott, “Social Network Analysis: A Handbook,” Sage, London, 2001.
[10] L. Freeman, “The Development of Social Network Analysis,” Empirical Press, Vancouver, 2004.
[11] M. Schwartz, “A Postscript to Catnets,” Sociologica, No. 1, 2008, pp.1-5.
[12] S. Borgatti, “A SOCNET Discussion on the Origins of the Term Social Capital,” Connections, Vol. 2, No. 21, 1998, pp. 37-46.
[13] P. Bourdieu, “Le Capital Social: Notes Provisoires,” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, Vol. 31, 1980, pp. 2-3.
[14] P. Bourdieu, “The Forms of Social Capital,” In: J. G. Richardson, Ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, New York, 1986, pp. 241-258.
[15] J. Coleman, “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, 1988, pp. 95-120. doi:10.1086/228943
[16] R. Putnam, “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 1, No. 6, 1995, pp. 665-678.
[17] P. Paxton. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 1, No. 105, 1999, pp. 88-127. doi:10.1086/210268
[18] C. Fischer, “Review of Bowling Alone: What’s the Sco- re?” Social Networks, Vol. 2, No. 27, 1999, pp. 55-167.
[19] S. Milgram, “The Small-World Problem,” Psychology Today, Vol. 1, 1967, pp. 60-67.
[20] D. Peter, S. Muhamad and D. Watts, “An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks,” Science, Vol. 301, No. 5634, 2003, pp. 827-829.
[21] P. Bonacich, “Factoring and Weighting Approaches to Status Scores and Clique Identification,” Journal of Ma- thematical Sociology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1972, pp. 113-120. doi:10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
[22] X. Qi, et al., “Terrorist Networks, Network Energy and Node Removal: A New Measure of Centrality Based on Laplacian Energy,” Social Networking, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013, pp. 19-31. doi:10.4236/sn.2013.21003
[23] M. Lopes, “Good Vibrations: The Social Networks of Optimists and Alter-Optimists,” Social Networking, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-12. doi:10.4236/sn.2012.11001
[24] R. Xerez, P. Figueiredo and M. Silva, “Social Networks and Computer Mediated Communication: The Emerging of a Social Structure in a Portuguese Bank.” In M. M. Cruz-Cunha, et al., Eds., Handbook of Research on Business Social Networking: Organizational, Managerial, and Technological Dimensions, IGI Global, Hershey, 2011, pp. 727-737. doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-168-9.ch038

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.