Pressurization System in Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming

Chetan Nikhare

doi:10.4236/mnsms.2013.33009

Home > Journals > Chemistry & Materials Science > MNSMS

MNSMS> Vol.3 No.3, July 2013

Share This Article:

Pressurization System in Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming ()

Abstract Full-Text HTML

Download as PDF (Size:2078KB) PP. 71-78

DOI: 10.4236/mnsms.2013.33009 3,157 Downloads 5,502 Views

Author(s) Leave a comment

Chetan Nikhare

Affiliation(s)

Mechanical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, Erie, USA.

ABSTRACT

Advanced high strength steels are the group of material with high strength and good formability, because high strength lesser gauge thickness can be used without compromising the function of component. In terms of economic forming process, hydroforming is the manufacturing option which uses a fluid medium to form a component by using high internal pressure. This process gained steep interest in the automotive and aerospace industries because of its many advantages such as part consolidation, good quality of the formed part etc. The main advantage is that the uniform pressure can be transferred to whole projected part at the same time. Low pressure tube hydroforming considered an inexpensive option for forming these advanced high strength steel. This paper investigates the pressurization system used during the low pressure tube hydroforming cycle. It is observed that the usage of ramp pressure cycle during forming the part from low pressure tube hydroforming results in lesser die holding force. Also, the stress, strain and thickness distribution of the part during low pressure tube hydroforming are critically analysed.

KEYWORDS

Pressure; Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming; Ramp Pressure; Constant Pressure; Advanced High Strength Steels

Cite this paper

C. Nikhare, "Pressurization System in Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming," Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Material Science, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013, pp. 71-78. doi: 10.4236/mnsms.2013.33009.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Schuler, “Metal Forming Handbook,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998, p. 405.

[2]	H. C. Lucke, C. Hartl and T. Abbey, “Hydroforming,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 115, No. 1, 2001, pp. 87-91. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00774-9

[3]	T. J. Kim, D. Y. Yang and S. S. Han, “Numerical Modelling of the Multi-Stage Sheet Pair Hydroforming Process,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 151, No. 1-3, 2004, pp. 48-53. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.124

[4]	F. Dohmann and C. Hartl, “Tube Hydroforming—Research and Practical Application,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 71, No. 1, 1997, pp. 174-186. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00166-0

[5]	K. K. Chen, R. J. Soldaat and R. M. Moses, “Free Expansion Bulge Testing of Tubes for Automotive Hydroform Applications,” SAE Technical Paper Series, 2004-01-0832.

[6]	H. Singh, “Fundamentals of Hydroforming,” Association for Forming and Fabricating Technologies of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Michigan, 2003.

[7]	K. Mori, T. Maeno and S. Maki, “Mechanism of Improvement of Formability in Pulsating Hydroforming of Tubes,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2007, pp. 978-984. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.07.006

[8]	M. Jansson, L. Nilsson and K. Simonsson, “The Use of Biaxial Test Data in the Validation of Constitutive Descriptions for Tube Hydroforming Applications,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 184, No. 1-3, 2007, pp. 69-76. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.039

[9]	C. Nikhare and K. Narasimhan, “Limit Strains Comparison during Tube and Sheet Hydroforming and Sheet Stamping Processes by Numerical Simulation,” Computers, Materials, & Continua, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2008, pp. 1-8.

[10]	C. Nikhare and K. Narasimhan, “Effect of Prestrain on Formability and Forming Limit Strains during Tube Hydroforming,” Computers, Materials, & Continua, Vol. 7 No. 3, 2008, pp. 129-138.

[11]	N. Asnafi and A. Skogsgardh, “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Stroke-Controlled Tube Hydroforming,” Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 279, No. 1-2 , 2000, pp. 95-110. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00646-2

[12]	N. Jain and J. Wang, “Plastic Instability in Dual-Pressure Tube-Hydroforming Process,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 12, 2005, pp. 1827-1837. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.07.010

[13]	L. M. Smith, S. Ganeshmurthy and K. Alladi, “Double-Sided High-Pressure Tubular Hydroforming,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 142, No. 3, 2003, pp. 599-608. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)01041-5

[14]	M. Mason, “Tube Hydroforming Using Sequenced Forming Pressures,” Proceedings of the International Seminar on Report Status and Trend of Tube Hydroforming, Tokyo, 1999, pp. 80-98.

[15]	Y. M. Hwang and T. Altan, “Finite Element Analyses of Tube Hydroforming Processes in a Rectangular Die,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1071-1082. doi:10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00157-9

[16]	Y. M. Hwang and T. Altan, “FE Simulation of the Crushing of Circular Tubes in Triangular Cross-Sections,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 125-126, 2002, pp. 833-838. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00385-0

[17]	C. Nikhare, M. Weiss and P. D. Hodgson, “Numerical Investigation of High and Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming,” Proceedings of Numisheet, Switzerland, 2008, pp. 691-696.

[18]	C. Nikhare, M. Weiss and P. D. Hodgson, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming on Stainless Steel,” Steel Research International, Krakow, 21-24 September 2008, pp. 272-279.

[19]	C. Nikhare, M. Weiss and P. D. Hodgson, “FEA Comparison of High and Low Pressure Tube Hydroforming of TRIP Steel,” Computational Materials Science, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2009, pp. 146-152. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024