Examining older patient preferences for quality of care in postacute transition care and day rehabilitation programs

Leah Couzner, Maria Crotty, Ruth Walker, Julie Ratcliffe

Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia;.
Flinders Clinical Effectiveness, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
South Australian Community Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

DOI: 10.4236/health.2013.56A2019                

Abstract

Background: Quality in health care has traditionally been determined based on clinical or health outcomes. However, these factors may not be the only aspects of health care that are important to patients. Within rehabilitation factors related to the process of care, the way in which rehabilitation services are delivered, may also be important to patients when defining quality of care. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the preferences of older people receiving post-acute outpatient rehabilitation or residential intermediate (transition) care for alternative configurations of rehabilitation programs. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed to elicit the preferences of older people for the design and delivery of post-acute rehabilitation programs. The participants were older adults (≥65 years) receiving post-acute outpatient rehabilitation or residential intermediate (transition) care in South Australia. Each participant was presented with a series of choice questions involving two hypothetical programs, the characteristics of which varied in every choice. Participants were then asked to select their preferred program. Results: Despite marked differences in case-mix and dependency levels, the preferences of the two groups were very similar, focusing on relationships and communication with health care professionals. Both groups demonstrated very strong preferences for the use of an electronic medical record and for receiving information about their treatment and progress via a meeting with a specialist physician and nurse. The outpatient rehabilitation group also exhibited a strong preference for a shared decision making model in relation to their future care needs. Conclusions: The findings highlight the commonality of preferences of older patients receiving post-acute services for the optimal configuration of rehabilitation services. Issues prioritised were service integration and access to senior medical and nursing staff. The study demonstrates the practicality and validity of DCEs to determine older people’s preferences in defining quality of care.

Keywords

DCE; Patient Preferences; Aged; Rehabilitation; Intermediate Care Facilities

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Brown, C.R. (2007) Where are the patients in the quality of health care? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 125-126. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm009
[2]	Ratcliffe, J., Laver, K., Couzner, L., Cameron, I., Gray, L. and Crotty, M. (2010) Not just about costs: The role of health economics in facilitating decision making in aged care, Age Ageing, 39, 426-429. doi:10.1093/ageing/afq041
[3]	Mainz, J. (2003) Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15, 523-530. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg081
[4]	Ryan, M., Major, K. and Skatun, D. (2005) Using discrete choice experiments to go beyond clinical outcomes when evaluating clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 22, 328-238. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00539.x
[5]	Brook, R.H., McGlynn, E.A. and Shekelle, P.G. (2000) Defining and measuring quality of care: A perspective from US researchers. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12, 281-295. doi:10.1093/intqhc/12.4.281
[6]	Eldar, R. (1999) Quality of care in rehabilitation medicine. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 11, 73- 79. doi:10.1093/intqhc/11.1.73
[7]	Breemhaar, B., Visser, A.P.H. and Kleijnen, J.G.V.M. (1990) Perceptions and behaviour among elderly hospital patients: Description and explanation of age differences in satisfaction, knowledge, emotions and behaviour. Social Science & Medicine, 31, 1377-1385. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90076-5
[8]	Ross, C.E. and Mirowsky, J. (1984) Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 189-197. doi:10.2307/2136668
[9]	Crow, R., Gage, H., Hampson, S. and Hart, J. (2002) The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technology Assess, 6.
[10]	Lanscar, E. and Louviere, J. (2008) Conducing discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics, 26, 661-677. doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004
[11]	Ryan, M. (2004) Discrete choice experiments in health care: NICE should consider using them for patient centred evaluations of technologies. BMJ, 328, 360-361. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7436.360
[12]	Gerard, K. and Ryan, M. (2008) Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell. In: Ryan, M., Gerard, K. and Amaya- Amaya, M., Eds., Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care, Springer, Dordrecht.
[13]	Grøndahl, V.A., Karlsson, I., Hall-Lord, M.L., Appelgren, J. and Wild-Larsson, B. (2011) Quality of care from patients’ perspective: Impact of the combination of person-related and external objective care conditions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 2540-2551. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03810.x
[14]	Street, D. and Burgess, L. (2007) The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods. Wiley, Hoboken. doi:10.1002/9780470148563
[15]	Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E. and McHugh, P.R. (1975) “Mini Mental State” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
[16]	Stata Corp. (2009) Stata statistical software: Release 11. College station. StataCorp LP., Texas.
[17]	Ryan, M., Watson, V. and Gerard, K. (2008) Practical issues in conducting a discrete choice experiment. In: Ryan, M., Gerard, K. and Amaya-Amaya, M., Eds., Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. Springer, Dordrech.
[18]	Lanscar, E and Louviere, J. (2006) Deleting “irrational” responses from discrete choice experiments: A case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Economics, 15, 797-811. doi:10.1002/hec.1104
[19]	Cornwell, J., Levenson, R., Sonola, L. and Poteliakhoff, E. (2012) Continuity of care for older hospital patients: A call for action. The Kings Fund.
[20]	Jacelon, C.S. (2004) Older adults and autonomy in acute care: Increasing patients’ independence and control during hospitalization. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30, 29-36.
[21]	Lothian, K. and Philp, I. (2001) Maintaining the dignity and autonomy of older people in the healthcare setting. BMJ, 332, 668-670. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7287.668
[22]	Atwal, A., Tattersall, K., Murphy, S., Davenport, N., Craik, C. and Caldwell, K. (2007) Older adults experiences of rehabilitation in acute health care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 21, 371-378. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00469.x
[23]	Lui, M.H.L. and Mackenzie, A.E. (1999) Chinese elderly patients’ perceptions of their rehabilitation needs following a stroke. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 391-400. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01087.x
[24]	Department of Health and Ageing (2012) E-Health, Australia. http://www.ehealth.gov.au/internet/ehealth/publishing.nsf/content/home
[25]	Westby, M.D. and Backman, C.L. (2010) Patient and health professional views on rehabilitation practices and outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A focus group study. BMC Health Services Research, 10.
[26]	McMurdo, M.E.T., Roberts, H., Parker, S., Wyatt, N., May, H., Goodman, C., et al. (2011) Improving recruitment of older people to research through good practice. Age Ageing, 40, 65. doi:10.1093/ageing/afr115