Share This Article:

Dialectology an Interactional Overlap of Disciplines

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:47KB) PP. 157-160
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2013.32021    4,134 Downloads   6,408 Views  

ABSTRACT

Dialectology has long been stereotyped as a limited scope of research since dialectologists long lived with the prejudice of being data collectors who amused their time to wander in rural meadows and converse with old peoples; and if there was any relationship between dialectology with other disciplines it was often viewed as intricate and sometimes controversial through many classificatory approaches. It is a false perception to view dialectology as autonomous discipline that inherits traditional dialect atlases; dialectology transcends the work on grounds to scrutinize the way linguistic variables function in speech. Since speech styles have social meaning that marks speakers’ social and personal identity, dialectology as an illustrious field of research is related to many other disciplines to study the analysis of these markers: such as anthropology, folklore, linguistics, phonology, sociology, psychology, history, sociolinguistics, education and literature. This paper, thus, highlights the relationship of dialectology to other disciplines of language in linguistic studies like sociolinguistics and education.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Ilhem, M. (2013) Dialectology an Interactional Overlap of Disciplines. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 157-160. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.32021.

References

[1] Adger, C. T., Wolfram, W., & Christian, D. (2007). Dialects in schools and communities (2nd ed.). Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
[2] Bolton, K., & Kwok, H. (1992). Sociolinguistics today: International perspectives. England: Routledge.
[3] Chambers, J.K., & Trudgill, P. (2004). Dialectology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.
[4] Cheshire, J. (1989). Dialect and education: Some European perspectives. Multilingual matters.
[5] Harrison, C. (1996). Methods of teaching reading: Key issues in research and implications for practice. Interchange, N39. The Scottish Office Education and Industry Department (SOEID). Edinburgh: GNP Booth Ltd.
[6] Hymes, D. (1977). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Routledge: Taylor and Francis.
[7] Labov, W. (1972). The logic of nonstandard English. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[8] Labov, W. (1995). Can reading failure be reversed: A linguistic approach to the question. In V. Gadsden, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Literacy among African-American youth: Issues in learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 39-68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
[9] Nero, J. S. (2006). Dialects, Englishes, Creoles, and education. England: Routledge.
[10] Trudgill,P. (2003). A glossary of sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.