Dielectric and Mechanical Nonlinear Behavior of Mn Doped PMN-35PT Ceramics


This paper presents an investigation on dielectric and mechanical nonlinear properties in Mn-doped PMN-35PT ceramics. The structural study of the ceramics verifies that the 1% mol Mn doped PMN-35PT is a pure perovskite phase with a tetragonal symmetry. SEM micrograph shows the same microstructural mor- phology of an undoped ceramic. From the EPR spectra, it has been concluded that the major part of Mn is present in Mn2+ rather than in Mn4+ form. The addition of Mn2+ ions acts on the dielectric, piezoelectric and mechanical properties by decreasing the relative dielectric permittivity (3800 to 2074), the dielectric losses (0.60 to 0.53), the piezoelectric coefficient d33 (650 to 403 pC/N), and increasing the mechanical quality fac- tor Qm (78 to 317). It was found that in Mn2+ doped ceramics the dielectric response can not be described by Rayleigh law. This result can be understood taking into account that reversible motion of the domain wall is a relevant contribution to response of this material.

Share and Cite:

D. Kobor, A. Hajjaji, J. Garcia, R. Perez, A. Albareda, L. Lebrun and D. Guyomar, "Dielectric and Mechanical Nonlinear Behavior of Mn Doped PMN-35PT Ceramics," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 1 No. 4, 2010, pp. 211-216. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2010.14032.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] G. A. Smolenskii and A. I. Agranovskaya, “Dielectric Polarization and Losses of Some Complex Compounds,” Soviet Physics Technical Physics, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1958, pp. 1380-1389.
[2] Y. H. Chen, K. Uchino and D. Viehland, “Substituent Effects in 0.65Pb (Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.35PbTiO3 Ceramics,” Journal of Electroceramics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2001, pp. 13-17.
[3] M. E. Lines and G. M. Glass, “Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2001, p. 77.
[4] S. E. Park and T. R. Shrout, “Ultrahigh Strain and Piezoelectric Behavior in Relaxor Based Ferroelectric Single Crystals,’’ Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 82, No. 4, 1997, pp. 1804-1811.
[5] S. W. Choi, T. R. Shrout, S. J. Jang and A. S. Bhalla, “Morphotropic Phase Boundary in Pb(Mgl/3 Nb2/3- PbTiO3 System,” Materials Letters, Vol. 8, No. 6-7, 1989, pp. 253-255.
[6] H. Takagi, K. Sakata and T. Takenaka, “Electrostrictive Properties of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-Based Relaxor Ferroelectric Ceramics,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 32, No. 9S, 1993, pp. 4280-4283.
[7] D. A. Hall, “Nonlinearity in Piezoelectric Ceramics,” Journal of Material Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 19, 2001, pp. 4575-4601.
[8] D. Kobor, A. Albareda, R. Perez, J. Garcia, L. Lebrun and D. Guyomar, “Dielectric and Mechanical Nonlinearities of <001> Oriented Pure and Doped Single Crystals of PZN-4.5PT,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 38, No. 13, 2005, pp. 2258-2264.
[9] A. K. Tangsev and A. E. Glazounov, “Mechanism of Polarization Response in the Ergodic Phase of a Relaxor Ferroelectric,’’ Physical Review B, Vol. 57, No. 1, 1998, pp. 18-21.
[10] J. D. S. Guerra, E. B. Araújo, C. A. Guarany, R. N. Reis and E. C. Lima, “Features of Dielectric Response in PMN–PT Ferroelectric Ceramics,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 41, No. 22, 2008, pp. 225504- 225508.
[11] J. E. Garcia, J. D. S. Guerra, E. B. Araújo and R. Pérez, “Domain Wall Contribution to Dielectric and Piezoelectric Responses in 0.65Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)–0.35PbTiO3 FerroEectric Ceramics,’’ Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 42, No. 11, 2009, pp. 115421-115425.
[12] A. Benayad, ‘‘Matériaux Monocristallins à Forte Activité Piézoélectrique: élaboration, Caractérisation et Application,’’ Thesis, INSA, December 2005, p. 155.
[13] L. Lebrun, B. Guiffard, E. Boucher, D. Audigier, D. Guyomar, L. Eyraud and E. Pleska, “Dielectric and Piezoelectric Properties of (La, Mg, F) and (Mg, Mn, F) Doped PZT Ceramics under Low and High Solicitations,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 21, No. 10-11, 2001, pp. 1357-1360.
[14] J. E. Garcia, R. Pérez and A. Albareda, “High Electric Field Measurement of Dielectric Constant and Losses of Ferroelectric Ceramics,’’ Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 34, No. 22, 2001, pp. 3279-3284.
[15] J. E. Garcia, R. Pérez and A. Albareda, “Contribution of Reversible Processes to the Non-Linear Dielectric Response in Hard Lead Zirconate Titanate Ceramics,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 17, No. 44, 2005, pp. 7143-7150.
[16] J. A. Casals, A. Albareda, R. Pérez, J. E. García, E. Minguella and F. M. de Espinosa, “Nonlinear Charac- terization with Burst Excitation of 1-3 Piezocomposites Transducers,” Ultrasonics, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2003, pp. 307- 311.
[17] A. Benayad, D. Kobor, L. Lebrun, B. Guiffard and D. Guyomar, “Characteristics of Pb[(Zn1/3Nb2/3)0.955Ti0.045] O3 Single Crystals Versus Growth Method,” Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol. 270, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 137-144.
[18] D. Damjanovic and M. Demartin, “Contribution of the Irreversible Displacement of Domain Walls to the Piezoelectric Effect in Barium Titanate and Lead Zirconate Titanate Ceramics,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 9, No. 23, 1997, pp. 4943-4953.

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.