Social Media in e-Governance: A Study with Special Reference to India

Abstract

This paper makes an attempt to analyze current use of social media and their promising advantages for e-governance in government organizations. It discusses potential issues especially issues related to security and privacy of individuals, employees, infrastructure and data that impede successful implementation of social media for e-governance. It examines draft government of India framework for embedding social media in organizational structure and examines issued guidelines for platform to be used, authorization to engage on behalf of government organization, scope and extend of such engagement, etc. It compares these guidelines with similar guidelines of some other nations in terms of employee’s access, account management, acceptable use, employee conduct, content, security, legal issues and citizen conduct and enumerates its merits, demerits and scope for further improvements.

Share and Cite:

Tariq Banday, M. and M. Mattoo, M. (2013) Social Media in e-Governance: A Study with Special Reference to India. Social Networking, 2, 47-56. doi: 10.4236/sn.2013.22006.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Human Capital Institute, “Social Networking in Government: Opportunities and Challenges,” 2012. http://www.hci.org/files/field_content_file/SNGovt_SummaryFINAL.pdf
[2] T. D. Susanto and R. Goodwin, “Factors Influencing Citizen Adoption of SMS-Based e-Government Services,” Electronic Journal of E-Government, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2010, pp. 55-71.
[3] United Nations, “e-Government Survey,” 2012. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan048065.pdf. ISBN:978-92-1-123190-8
[4] R. Reffat, “Developing a Successful e-Government,” Working Paper, School of Architecture, Design Science and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2003.
[5] Z. Fang, “e-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice and Development,” International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Information, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2002, pp. 1-22.
[6] W. Darrell, “US State and Federal e-Government Full Report,” 2002. http://www. insidepolitics.org/egovt02us.pdf
[7] N. Sampson, “Bank Marketing International: Simplifying in (Form)ation,” 2002. http://www.mandoforms.com/news/coverage/bankmarketing.html
[8] A. Kurunananda and V. Weerakkody, “e-Government Implementation in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK,” Proceedings of 8th International Information Technology Conference, Colombo, 12-13 October 2006, pp. 53-65.
[9] F. Bélanger and L. Carter, “The Effects of the Digital Divide on e-Government: An Empirical Evaluation,” Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 1-7.
[10] D. H. McKnight and N. L. Chervany, “What Trust Means in e-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2001-2002, pp. 35- 59.
[11] F. V. Morgeson, D. Van Amburg and S. Mithas, “Misplaced Trust? Exploring the Structure of the e-Government-Citizen Trust Relationship,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2010. http://www.terpconnect.umd.edu/~smithas/papers/morgesonetal2010jpart.pdf
[12] T. S. H. Teo, S. C. Srivastava and L. Jiang, “Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2008-2009, pp. 99-132.
[13] E. W. Welch, C. C. Hinnant and M. J. Moon, “Linking Citizen’s Satisfaction with e-Government and Trust in Government,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2005, pp. 371-391. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021
[14] B. Shah, “Increasing e-Government Adoption through Social Media: A Case of Nepal,” ?rebro University, Swedish Business School at ?rebro University, ?rebro, Swe- den, 2010. http://oru.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:372485/FULLTEXT01
[15] Y. Charalabidis and E. Loukis, “Transforming Government Agencies’ Approach to e-Participation through Efficient Exploitation of Social Media,” ECIS 2011 Proceedings, Paper 84, 2011. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis 2011/84.
[16] J. Michael Magro, “A Review of Social Media Use in e-Government,” Administrative Science, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp. 148-161. doi:10.3390/admsci2020148
[17] J. Hrdinova, N. Helbig and C. S. Peters, “Designing Social Media Policy for Government: Eight Essential Elements,” Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, 2010. www.ctg.Albany.edu
[18] D. Landsbergen, “Government as Part of the Revolution: Using Social Media to Open Government,” Ohio State University, Columbus, 2010.
[19] D. Landsbergen, “Government as Part of the Revolution: Using Social Media to Achieve Public Goals,” Electronic Journal of e-Government, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2010, pp. 135- 147.
[20] C. I. O. Council, “Guidelines for Secure Use of Social Media by Federal Departments and Agencies,” Federal CIO Council ISIMC NISSC Web 2.0 Security Working Group, 2009, pp. 1-19.
[21] P. Trudel, “Web 2.0 Regulation: A Risk Management Process,” Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2010, pp. 243-265. http://cjlt.dal.ca/vol7_ no2/pdf/trudel.pdf
[22] DEIT, “Framework & Guidelines for Use of Social Media for Government Organizations,” Department of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, 2012. http://www.negp.gov.in/pdfs/Social%20Media%20Framework%20and%20Guidelines.pdf

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.