Share This Article:

Reliability Analysis of Controller Area Network Based Systems—A Review

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:500KB) PP. 155-166
DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2013.64019    3,477 Downloads   5,624 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the research work done on the Reliability Analysis of Controller Area Network (CAN) based systems. During the last couple of decades, real-time researchers have extended schedulability analysis to a mature technique which for nontrivial systems can be used to determine whether a set of tasks executing on a single CPU or in a distributed system will meet their deadlines or not [1-3]. The main focus of the real-time research community is on hard real-time systems, and the essence of analyzing such systems is to investigate if deadlines are met in a worst case scenario. Whether this worst case actually will occur during execution, or if it is likely to occur, is not normally considered. Reliability modeling, on the other hand, involves study of fault models, characterization of distribution functions of faults and development of methods and tools for composing these distributions and models in estimating an overall reliability figure for the system [4]. This paper presents the research work done on reliability analysis developed with a focus on Controller-Area-Network-based automotive systems.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

G. Mary, Z. Alex and L. Jenkins, "Reliability Analysis of Controller Area Network Based Systems—A Review," International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, Vol. 6 No. 4, 2013, pp. 155-166. doi: 10.4236/ijcns.2013.64019.

References

[1] N. C. Audsley, A. Burns, M. F. Richardson, K. Tindell and A. J. Wellings, “Applying New Scheduling Theory to Static Priority Pre-Emptive Scheduling,” Software Engineering Journal, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1993, pp. 284-292. doi:10.1049/sej.1993.0034
[2] L. Sha, R. Rajkumar and J. P. Lehoczky, “Priority Inheritance Protocols: An Approach to Real-Time Synchronization,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 39, No. 9, 1990, pp. 1175-1185. doi:10.1109/12.57058
[3] J. Xu and D. L. Parnas, “Priority Scheduling versus Pre-Run-Time Scheduling,” Real-Time Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000, pp. 7-23.
[4] H. Hansson, C. Norstrom and S. Punnekkat, “Integrating Reliability and Timing Analysis of CAN-Based Systems,” Proceedings of 2000 IEEE International Workshop Factory Communication Systems (WFCS’2000), Porto, 2000, pp. 165-172.
[5] A. Burns, G. Bernat and I. Broster, “A Probabilistic Framework for Schedulability Analysis,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Embedded Software Conference (EMSOFT03), Philadelphia, 13-15 October 2003, pp. 1-15.
[6] L. Wang, Z. H. Wu and X. M. Wu, “Schedulability Analysis for Fault-Tolerant Group-Based Preemptive Scheduling,” Proceedings of the Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Alexandria, 24-27 January 2005, pp. 71-76.
[7] I. Broster, G. Bernat and A. Burns, “Weakly Hard Real-Time Constraints on Controller Area Network,” 14th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, Viena, 19-21 June 2002, pp. 134-141.
[8] I. Broster, A. Burns and G. Rodriguez-Navas, “Probabilistic Analysis of CAN with Faults,” 23rd IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, Austin, 3-5 December 2002, pp. 269-278.
[9] G. M. de A. Lima and A. Burns, “An Optimal Fixed-Priority Assignment Algorithm for Supporting Fault-Tolerant Hard Real-Time Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 52, No. 10, 2003, pp. 1332-1346. doi:10.1109/TC.2003.1234530
[10] M. Sebastian and R. Ernst, “Modelling and Designing Reliable Onchip-Communication Devices in Mpsocs with Real-Time Requirements,” 13th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Hamburg, 15-18 September 2008, pp. 1465-1472.
[11] A. Burns, S. Punnekkat, L. Strigini and D. R. Wright, “Probabilistic Scheduling Guarantees for Fault-Tolerant Real-Time Systems,” Dependable Computing for Critical Applications, 1999, pp. 361-378.
[12] S. Punnekkat, H. Hansson and C. Norstrom, “Response Time Analysis under Errors for CAN,” Proceedings of IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS 2000), 2000, pp. 258-265.
[13] K. W. Tindell and A. Burns, “Guaranteed Message Latencies for Distributed Safety-Critical Hard Real-Time Control Networks,” Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, 1994.
[14] N. Navet, Y.-Q. Song and F. Simonot, “Worst-Case Deadline Failure Probability in Real-Time Applications Distributed over Controller Area Network,” Journal of Systems Architecture, Vol. 7, No. 46, 2000, pp. 607-617. doi:10.1016/S1383-7621(99)00016-8
[15] M. Sebastian and R. Ernst, “Reliability Analysis of Single Bus Communication with Real-Time Requirements,” Proceedings of the 2009 15th IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing, 2009, pp. 3-10.
[16] A. Burns, R. Davis and S. Punnekkat, “Feasibility Analysis of Fault-Tolerant Real-time Task Set,” 8th Euromicro Workshop on Real-Time Systems, 1996, pp. 209-216.
[17] G. M. de A. Lima and A. Burns, “An Effective Schedulability Analysis for Fault-Tolerant Hard Real-Time Systems,” 13th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, 2001, pp. 209-216.
[18] H. Aysan, A. Thekkilakattil, R. Dobrin and S. Punnekkat, “Efficient Fault Tolerant Scheduling on Controller Area Network (CAN),” IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Bilbao, 13-16 September 2010.
[19] H. S. Hu and G. H. Qin, “Online Fault Diagnosis for Controller Area Networks,” International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICI-CTA), Vol. 1, 2011, pp. 452-455.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.