Object-Spatial Imagery Types of Japanese College Students


This study investigated the object-spatial imagery types found among Japanese college students. First, we examined the descriptive statistics of the Japanese version of the Object-Spatial Imagery Questionnaire object-spatial imagery scales, which measure respondents’ tendencies with respect to object-spatial imagery types. Although the means of these subscales were lower than those of the original versions, the raw score distributions and gender differences were similar to those obtained using the original version. Additionally, we compared imagery types among students in seven different academic departments. Specifically, the results showed specific patterns of imagery type among students in each department, indicating that the object-spatial imagery type model is applicable to Japanese college students and that individual imagery type data would be helpful for career guidance.

Share and Cite:

Kawahara, M. & Matsuoka, K. (2013). Object-Spatial Imagery Types of Japanese College Students. Psychology, 4, 165-168. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.43024.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 239-263. doi:10.1002/acp.1182
[2] Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 638-663. doi:10.1002/acp.1473
[3] Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2010). Visual-object ability: A new dimension of non-verbal intelligence. Cognition, 117, 276-301. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.021
[4] Farah, M. J., Hammond, K. M., Levine, D. N., & Calvanio, R. (1988). Visual and spatial mental imagery: Dissociable systems of representations. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 439-462. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90012-6
[5] Fujioka, H. (1987). Vocational preference and cognitive modes of university students. The Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 53-62.
[6] Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. A. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah, & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[7] Kassels, S. (1991). Transforming imagery into art: A study of the life and work of Georgia O’Keeffe. In R. G. Kunzendorf (Ed.), Mental imagery (pp. 45-52). New York: Plenum Press.
[8] Kawahara, M., & Matsuoka, K. (2012).Development of a Japanese version of the Object-Spatial Imagery Questionnaire. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 18, 13-18. doi:10.4036/iis.2012.13
[9] Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[10] Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O., & Becker, M. (2010). Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: Restriction in the development of visual processing resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 29-35. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.1.29
[11] Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710-726. doi:10.3758/BF03195337
[12] Levine, D. N., Warach, J., & Farah, M. J. (1985). Two visual systems in mental imagery: Dissociation of “what” and “where” in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Neurology, 35, 1010-1018. doi:10.1212/WNL.35.7.1010
[13] Motes, M. A., Malach, R., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2008). Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers. NeuroReport, 19, 1727-1731. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328317f3e2
[14] Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.291
[15] Rosenberg, H. S. (1987). Visual artists and imagery. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 7, 77-93. doi:10.2190/AVJ5-N24B-P7MC-HR4R
[16] Smith, I. M. (1964). Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. London: University of London Press.
[17] Sternberg, T. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[18] Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.