The Psychometric Properties of a Jordanian Version of Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two, OEQII


This study deals with the psychometric properties and derivation of norms for an Arabic version of the Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two, OEQII. The standardization sample consisted of 289 students (159 males, 130 females) ranging from 15-17 years in age. Factor analysis and one-way ANOVA reveals a good construct, factorial, and discriminatory validity. The Cronbach-a formula was used to estimate internal consistency coefficients. All the results indicate acceptable reliability for the OEQII. The Overexcitabilities scores were distributed normally in terms of the age range. And the Deviation for the Overexcitabilities degrees and percentiles were calculated for each group of the sample. Finally, results indicated no statistical difference at (α=0.05) among males and females students in the total scale, the female tended to do better in the overall average of the OEQII andin Sensual and in Emotional Overexcitability: Overall, the OEQII appears to have acceptable psychometric characteristics allowing for use instrument to promote the use of strength-based learning activities to enhance instructional practice and personal improvement.

Share and Cite:

Al-Onizat, S. (2013). The Psychometric Properties of a Jordanian Version of Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two, OEQII. Creative Education, 4, 49-61. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.41008.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bouchet, N., & Falk, F. (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 260-267. doi:10.1177/001698620104500404
[2] Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted, developing the potential of children to home and school (4th ed.). London: Macmillan Publishing Company.
[3] Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.
[4] Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development (Vol. 1). New York: Dabor Science Publications.
[5] Dabrowski, K. (1996). Multilevelness of emotional and instinctive functions. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.
[6] Falk, R. F., Lind, S., Miller, N. B., Piechowski, M. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1999). The Overexcitabilities Questionnaire-Two (OEQII). Denver, CO: Institute for the Study of Advanced Development.
[7] Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. New York: World Book. doi:10.1037/13574-000
[8] Piechowski, M., Silverman, L., & Falk, R. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539-549. doi:10.2466/pms.1985.60.2.539
[9] Piechowski, M., & Miller, N. (1994). Assessing developmental potential in gifted children: A comparison of methods. Roeper Reivew, 7, 176-180.
[10] Piechowski, M. (2006). “Mellow out”, they say. If I only could: Intensities and sensitivities of the young and bright. Madison, WI: Yunasa books.
[11] Renzulli, J. (1986). Systems for the gifted and talented. Mansfield, CO: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
[12] Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexaming a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
[13] Silverman, L. (1983). Issues in affective development of the gifted. In J. Vantassel-Baska (Eds.), A practical guide to counseling the gifted in school setting. Reston, VA: Council for exceptional children.
[14] Silverman, L. (1993). Counseling of the gifted and talented. Denver: Love.
[15] Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.