Share This Article:

Non-rigid registration and KLT filter to improve SNR and CNR in GRE-EPI myocardial perfusion imaging

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:627KB) PP. 871-877
DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2012.512A110    3,815 Downloads   5,493 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of motion compensation by non-rigid registration combined with the Karhunen-Loeve Transform (KLT) filter on the signal to noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of hybrid gradient-echo echoplanar (GRE-EPI) first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Twenty one consecutive first-pass adenosine stress perfusion MR data sets interpreted positive for ischemia or infarction were processed by non-rigid Registration followed by KLT filtering. SNR and CNR were measured in abnormal and normal myocardium in unfiltered and KLT filtered images following nonrigid registration to compensate for respiratory and other motions. Image artifacts introduced by filtering in registered and nonregistered images were evaluated by two observers. There was a statistically sig- nificant increase in both SNR and CNR between normal and abnormal myocardium with KLT filtering (mean SNR increased by 62.18% ± 21.05% and mean CNR increased by 58.84% ± 18.06%; p = 0.01). Motion correction prior to KLT filtering reduced significantly the occurrence of filter induced artifacts (KLT only-artifacts in 42 out of 55 image series vs. registered plus KLT-artifacts in 3 out of 55 image series). In conclusion the combination of non-rigid registration and KLT filtering was shown to increase the SNR and CNR of GRE-EPI perfusion images. Subjective evaluation of image artifacts revealed that prior motion compensation significantly reduced the artifacts introduced by the KLT filtering process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Mihai, G. , Ding, Y. , Xue, H. , Chung, Y. , Rajagopalan, S. , Guehring, J. and Simonetti, O. (2012) Non-rigid registration and KLT filter to improve SNR and CNR in GRE-EPI myocardial perfusion imaging. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 5, 871-877. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2012.512A110.

References

[1] Gebker, R., Schwitter, J., Fleck, E. and Nagel, E. (2007) How we perform myocardial perfusion with cardiovascu- lar magnetic resonance. Journal of Cardiovascular Mag- netic Resonance, 9, 539-547. doi:10.1080/10976640600897286
[2] Kellman, P. and Arai, A.E. (2007) Imaging sequences for first pass perfusion: A review. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 9, 525-537. doi:10.1080/10976640601187604
[3] Di Bella, E.V., Wu, Y.J., Alexander, A.L., Parker, D.L., Green, D. and McGann, C.J. (2003) Comparison of tem- poral filtering methods for dynamic contrast MRI myo- cardial perfusion studies. Magnetic Resonance in Medi- cine, 49, 895-902. doi:10.1002/mrm.10439
[4] Goldstein, T.A., Zhang, H., Misselwitz, B., Gropler, R.G. and Zheng, J. (2006) Improvement of quantification of myoardial first-pass perfusion mapping: A temporal and spatial wavelet denoising method. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 56, 439-445. doi:10.1002/mrm.20950
[5] Bidaut, L.M. and Vallee, J.P. (2001) Automated registra- tion of dynamic MR images for the quantification of myocardial perfusion. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 13, 648-655. doi:10.1002/jmri.1092
[6] Dornier, C., Ivancevic, M.K., Thevenaz, P. and Vallee, J.P. (2003) Improvement in the quantification of myocar- dial perfusion using an automatic spline-based registra- tion algorithm. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 18, 160-168. doi:10.1002/jmri.10351
[7] Gallippi, C.M., Kramer, C.M., Hu, Y.L., Vido, D.A., Rei- chek, N. and Rogers, W.J. (2002) Fully automated Regis- tration and warping of contrast-enhanced first-pass perfu- sion images. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Reso- nance, 4, 459-469. doi:10.1081/JCMR-120016384
[8] Gupta, S.N., Solaiyappan, M., Beache, G.M., Arai, A.E. and Foo, T.K. (2003) Fast method for correcting image misregistration due to organ motion in time-series MRI data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 49, 506-514. doi:10.1002/mrm.10394
[9] Ding, Y., Chung, Y.C., Raman, S.V. and Simonetti, O.P. (2009) Application of the Karhunen-Loeve transform temporal image filter to reduce noise in real-time cardiac cine MRI. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 54, 3909- 3922. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/12/020
[10] Ding, Y., Chung, Y.-C., Raman, S. and Simonetti, O. (2008) Characteristics and performance of the Karhunen- Loeve transform filter in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Pro-ceedings of the 16th International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Scientific Meet- ing & Exhibition, Toronto, 3-9 May 2008, 2858.
[11] Xue, H., Guehring, J., Srinivasan, L., et al. (2008) Eva- luation of rigid and non-rigid motion compensation of cardiac perfusion MRI. Proceedings of the 11th Interna- tional Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2008), New York, 6-10 September 2008, 35-43.
[12] Chefdhotel, C., Hermosillo, G. and Faugeras, O. (2002) Flows of diffeomorphisms for multimodal image registra- tion. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Sympo- sium on Biomedical Imaging, Washington DC, 7-10 July 2002, 753-756. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2002.1029367
[13] Hermosillo, G., Chefdhotel, C. and Faugeras, O. (2002) Variational methods for multimodal image matching. In- ternational Journal of Computer Vision, 50, 329-343. doi:10.1023/A:1020830525823
[14] Golub, G. and Van Loan, C. (1996) Matrix computation. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996.
[15] Jolliffe, I. (2002) Principal component analysis. Speringer, New York.
[16] Kim, R.J., Wu, E., Rafael, A., et al. (2000) The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to iden- tify reversible myocardial dysfunction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 1445-1453. doi:10.1056/NEJM200011163432003
[17] Schwitter, J., Nanz, D., Kneifel, S., et al. (2001) Assess- ment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emis- sion tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation, 103, 2230-2235. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.103.18.2230
[18] Lyne, J.C., Gatehouse, P.D., Assomull, R.G., et al. (2007) Direct comparison of myocardial perfusion cardiovascu- lar magnetic resonance sequences with parallel acquisi- tion. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 26, 1444- 1451. doi:10.1002/jmri.21167
[19] Riabkov, D., Di Bella, E. and Sinusas, A. (2003) Denois- ing of the dymanic sequence of images for cardiac perfu- sion studies. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 11, 953.
[20] Ding, Y., Chung, Y.-C., Raman, S.V. and Simonetti, O.P. (2009) Application of the Karhunen-Loeve transform temporal image filter to reduce noise in real-time cardiac cine MRI. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 54, 3909- 3922. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/12/020
[21] Vallee, J.P., Sostman, H.D., MacFall, J.R., et al. (1997) MRI quantitative myocardial perfusion with compart- mental analysis: A rest and stress study. Magnetic Reso- nance in Medicine, 38, 981-989. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910380618
[22] Bansal, R. and Funka-Lea, G. (2002) Integrated image registration for cardiac MR perfusion data. Springer, Berlin, 659-666.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.