Legal Assistance for Accused and Victims in Austrian Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings

Alois Birklbauer; Richard Soyer; Christoph Weber

doi:10.4236/blr.2012.34027

Home > Journals > Social Sciences & Humanities > BLR

Beijing Law Review > Vol.3 No.4, December 2012

Legal Assistance for Accused and Victims in Austrian Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings ()

Alois Birklbauer, Richard Soyer, Christoph Weber

Faculty of Law, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria..

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2012.34027 PDF HTML 4,199 Downloads 6,216 Views Citations

Abstract

Based on two research projects this paper evaluates the legal assistance for accused and victims in pre-trial criminal proceedings in Austria after the implementation of a revised law on pre-trial proceedings in 2008. The research projects combined legal and empirical research. The project for scientific evaluation of the realization of the criminal procedure reform law (PEUS) analysed approx. 5000 pre-trial files and has additionally conducted 85 interviews with police officers, prosecutors, judges and lawyers. The results of the empirical research provide insight into which extent in practice in Austrian criminal proceedings the accused has access to legal advise. The paper comes to the conclusion that by strengthening victims’ access to legal representation in Austrian criminal proceedings in numerous cases the actual division of power to influence the proceedings has shifted from the accused to the victim.

Keywords

Pre-Trial Criminal Procedure; Legal Assistance; Accused; Victim; Law in Practice

Share and Cite:

A. Birklbauer, R. Soyer and C. Weber, "Legal Assistance for Accused and Victims in Austrian Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings," Beijing Law Review, Vol. 3 No. 4, 2012, pp. 213-216. doi: 10.4236/blr.2012.34027.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	A. Birklbauer, C. Weber, B. Starzer, W. Stangl and R. Soyer, “Die Rechtspraxis des Ermittlungsverfahrens nach der Strafprozessreform. Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse einer rechtstats?chlichen Untersuchung,” ?sterreichische Juristenzeitung, Vol. 66, No. 19, 2011, pp. 852-867.
[2]	A. Birklbauer, W. Stangl, R. Soyer, C. Weber, B. Starzer, H. Hirtenlehner, R. Gombots and W. Hammerschick, “Die Rechtspraxis des Ermittlungsverfahrens nach der Strafprozessreform. Eine rechtstats?chliche Untersuchung,” Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Vienna and Graz, 2011.
[3]	S. Schumann, K. Bruckmüller, and R. Soyer, “Pre-Trial Emergency Defence,” Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Intersentia, Vienna, Graz and Antwerp, 2012.
[4]	S. Schumann, K. Bruckmüller and R. Soyer, “Assessing Pre-Trial Access to Legal Advice—Results of a Comparative Legal and Empirical Study,” New Journal of European Criminal Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2012, pp. 31-48.
[5]	R. Kier, “§ 66 StPO,” In: H. Fuchs and E. Ratz, Eds., Wiener Kommentar zur Strafprozessordnung, Manz, Vienna, 2009.