Indexed Learning: Protagoras’s Computer


Information technology and communication in education have transformed the traditional school in digital classrooms. The adaptability of technological tools as teaching-learning resources facilitates the rationalization of educational work. Operate with a network computer, through digital information flows, allows us to opening choices for preparing and presenting educational contents. The practical utilities are perhaps the most visible aspect of this new form that takes the contemporary education. Deepening on changes that occur in schools, it is necessary ask ourselves on the model of learning that information and communication technologies (ICT) trigger. It is also necessary to realize the need of adjusting the educative offer to the student’s ways of receiving information, linking teaching contents to the learning style of students. This paper reflects on this topic of discussion, introducing as a debate the new learning styles that raise the digital technologies. Such a learning style is called here indexed.

Share and Cite:

Dopico, E. & Fernández-Urquiza, M. (2012). Indexed Learning: Protagoras’s Computer. Creative Education, 3, 1301-1306. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.38190.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Abdelaziz, M., Samer Kamel, S., Karam, O., & Abdelrahman, A. (2011). Evaluation of E-learning program versus traditional lecture instruction for undergraduate nursing students in a faculty of nursing. Teaching and Learning in Nursering, 6, 50-58. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2010.10.003
[2] Anderson, C. (2004). The long tail. Wired Magazine, 12, 170-177.
[3] Arter, J., & Spandel, V. (1991). Using portafolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory
[4] Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
[5] Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television. Barcelona: Anagrama.
[6] Bowden, J. A., & Marton, F. (2004). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence. Oxford: Routledge.
[7] Butakov, S., & Scherbinin, V. (2009). The toolbox for local and global plagiarism detection. Computers & Education, 52, 719-914. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.001
[8] Ca?as, A. J., Novak, J. D., & González, F. M. (Eds.) (2004). Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona: Universidad Pública de Navarra, 125-133.
[9] Castells, M. (2000). Network society. In The information age. Madrid: Alianza.
[10] Cohen-Tannoudji, C. (1992). Quantum mechanics. New York: Willey.
[11] Cornella, A. (2006). The key ideas of infonomia. If Innovation Magazine, 39, 12-38
[12] CPR (2007). Teachers’ center and resources of Gijon. URL (last checked 17 September 2012).
[13] De Bono, E. (2000). Simplicity. London: Penguin books
[14] Delors, J. (1997). Learning: The treasure within. Madrid: Santillana; Ediciones UNESCO.
[15] Dilthey, W. (1940). Foundations of a pedagogy system. Buenos Aires: Losada.
[16] Dodge, B. (1995). Some thoughts about WebQuests. San Diego: University of San Diego.
[17] Dopico, E. (2009). Areas of the oral tradition in Asturias: Eco-education and Learning. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
[18] Froufe Torres, M. (2006). Aprendizaje asociativo. Principios y aplicaciones. Madrid: Paraninfo.
[19] Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 455-479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310
[20] Gewerc Barujel, A. (2005). The use of weblogs in the university teaching. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago.
[21] Gómez Pin, V. (2006). Between wolves and automatons. Madrid: Espasa.
[22] Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16, 21-46
[23] Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill Book.
[24] Gutiérrez Marín, A. (2003). Digital literacy. Something more than mice and keys. Barcelona: Gedisa.
[25] Habermas, J. (1985). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Barcelona: Península.
[26] Herbart, J. F. (1999). Education through instruction. México: Trillas.
[27] Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52, 78-82. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
[28] Iding, M. K., Crosby, M. E., Auernheimer, B., & Klemm, E. B. (2009). Web site credibility: Why do people believe what they believe? Instructional Science, 37, 43-63. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9080-7
[29] Jay Gould, S. (2004). The structure of evolutionary theory. Barcelona: Tusquets.
[30] Kamsin, A. (2005). Is E-learning the solution and substitute for conventional learning. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13, 79-89.
[31] Kant, E. (1991). On Pedagogy. Barcelona: Servicio de publicaciones de la EUMO.
[32] Kant, I. (1966). Critique of pure reason. Stuttgart: Reclam.
[33] Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur. How today’s internet is destroying our culture. New York: Doubleday.
[34] Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Onchwari, J. (2009). Technology and student learning: Towards a learner-centered teaching model. AACE Journal, 17, 11-22
[35] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice may.
[36] Kosko, B. (1993). The new science of fuzzy logic. New York: Hyperion publishers.
[37] Koutsomitropoulos, D. A., Alexopoulos, A. D., Solomou, G. D., & Papatheodorou, T. S. (2010). The use of metadata for educational resources in digital repositories: Practices and perspectives. D-Lib Magazine, 16. doi:10.1045/january2010-koutsomitropoulos
[38] Lévy, P. (2004). Collective intelligence. For an anthropology of the cyberspace. URL (last checked 12 September 2012).
[39] Liao, H. L., & Lu, H. P. (2008). The role of experience and innovation characteristics in the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites. Computers & Education, 51, 1405-1818. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006
[40] Locke, J. (1986). Thoughts on education. Madrid: Akal.
[41] Locke, J. (1999). Essay concerning human understanding. San Diego: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
[42] López Camps, J., & Leal Fernández, I. (2002). To learn to plan the formation. Barcelona: Paidos.
[43] Martínez, O. (Ed.) (2008). Platón. Protágoras, Gorgias, Menón. Madrid: Editorial Edad.
[44] Méndez, A., Mesa, J. A., & Mesa, J. (Eds.) (2003). Advances in technology-based education. Toward a knowledge-based society. III International Conference on Multimedia ICT’s in Education, Badajoz, 3-6 December 2003, 747-750.
[45] Mitchell, T. M. (2006). The discipline of machine learning. Pittsburg: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
[46] Neuman, U., & Kyriakakis, C. (2002). 2020 classroom. URL (last checked 1 October 2012).
[47] Norman, D. (1988). Psychology of everyday things. URL (last checked 12 September 2012).
[48] Novak, J. D., & Ca?as, A. J. (2006). The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool. Information Visualization Journal, 5, 175-184. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500126
[49] Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B., (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173469
[50] Obach, X. (1997). To learn to plan the formation. Madrid: Anaya.
[51] Orihuela, J. L. (2006). The blogging revolution. Madrid: La Esfera de los Libros.
[52] Ornstein, R. E. (1976). The mind field. New York: Grossman Publishers.
[53] Paterlini, M. (2007). There shall be order. The legacy of linnaeus in the age of molecular biology. EMBO Reports, 8, 814-816. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401061
[54] Pérez Gómez, A. I. (1993). School learning: From operative didactic to the reconstruction of the culture in the classroom In J. Gimeno Sacristán, & A. Pérez Gómez (Eds.) Understand and transform teaching. Madrid: Morata.
[55] Pestalozzi, H. (2006). Letters on early education. Madrid: Tecnos.
[56] Platón (1999). The republic. Madrid: Alianza.
[57] Prensky, M. (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 5, 1-9. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
[58] Raskin, J. (2000). The Humane Interface. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
[59] Rheingold, H. (1993). Virtual communities. Reading Mass: Addison Wesley.
[60] Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In: E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 28-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[61] Salas Vinent, M. E. (2009). From the traditional teaching-learning process to the teaching-learning process for the competencies formation in students of primary, secondary and higher education. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 1.
[62] Sartori, G. (1997). Homo videns. The remote-control society. Madrid: Taurus.
[63] Schleicher, A. (2006). The economics of knowledge: Why education is key for Europe’s success. URL (last checked 5 October 2012).
[64] Thomas, C., Britt, P., Blackbourn, J. M., Blackbourn, R., Papason, B., Tyler, J. L., & Williams, F. (2005). Portfolio assessment: A guide for teachers and administrators. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal Electronic, 23, 1-8.
[65] Tíscar, L. (2005). Blogs to educate. Revista Telos, 65, 86-93.
[66] Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[67] Vigotsky, L. (1988). The development of higher psychological processes. México: Grijalbo.
[68] Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
[69] Wagensberg, J. (2006). To + as – why. Barcelona: Tusquets.
[70] Walsh, L. (2007). Using extensible markup language (XML) for the single source delivery of educational resources by print and online: A case study. AACE Journal, 15, 389-411.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.