The Influence of Interactive Control on Subsidiary Performance: A Mediating Role of Subsidiary Managers’ Strategic Behavior

DOI: 10.4236/ajor.2012.24056   PDF   HTML     4,112 Downloads   6,808 Views   Citations


Under the principal-agent relationship, there are two major factors that directly affect subsidiary strategy’s implementation and performance—enterprise groups’ internal interactive control and subsidiary managers’ strategic behavior. Prior research showed that the parent companies hope their subsidiary managers to be obedient and active, i.e. to keep a high degree of strategic identity and subsidiary initiative. We build and analyze a model to test the mediating role of strategic identity and subsidiary initiative based on data collected from Chinese groups. The results show that interactive control, strategic identity and subsidiary initiative all could improve subsidiary performance, furthermore, subsidiary initiative is a mediator between decision-making decentralization and subsidiary performance, and also a mediator between horizontal communication and subsidiary performance, the mediating role of strategic identity is not tested, but vertical communication can improve strategic identity. In the conclusions, we provide guidance on how parent companies to choose excellent subsidiary managers, and then how to develop a suite interactive control system.

Share and Cite:

B. Luo, J. Yu, Z. Lu and L. Wan, "The Influence of Interactive Control on Subsidiary Performance: A Mediating Role of Subsidiary Managers’ Strategic Behavior," American Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2012, pp. 473-481. doi: 10.4236/ajor.2012.24056.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] S. Kzlberg, “Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 85, No. 5, 1980, pp. 1145-1179. doi:10.1086/227128
[2] K. Kautz and V. Mahnke, “Value Creation through IT- Supported Knowledge Management?” Informing Science, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2003, pp. 75-88. doi:
[3] S. Robert, “Levers of Organization Design: How Managers use Accountability for Greater Performance and Commitment,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2005.
[4] J. R. Barker, “Tightening the Iron Cage: Concretive Control in Self-managing Teams,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1993, pp. 408-437. doi:10.2307/2393374
[5] M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Owner-Ship Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1976, pp. 305-360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
[6] W. Tsai, “Social Structure of ‘Coopetition’ with in a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing,” Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 179-190. doi:10.1287/orsc.
[7] M. I. Rapert, A. Velliquetteb and J. A. Garretson, “The Strategic Implementation Process Evoking Strategic Consensus through Communication,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, No. 5, 2002, pp. 301-310. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00157-0
[8] E. Siemsen, S. Balasubramanian and A. V. Roth, “Incentives that Induce Task-Related Effort, Helping, and Knowledge Sharing in Workgroups,” Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 10, 2007, pp.1533-1550. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0714
[9] N. S. Hilla, K. M. Bartolb, P. E. Teslukb and G. A. Langab, “Organizational Context and Face-to-Face Interaction: Influences on the Development of Trust and Collaborative Behaviors in Computer-Mediated Groups,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 108, No. 2, 2009, pp.187-201. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.002
[10] R. A. Simon. “Administrative Behavior, a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization,” The Macmillan Co., New York, 1976
[11] S. Valentine, L. Godkin and M. Lucero. “Ethical Context, Organizational Commitment, and Person-Organization Fit,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2002, pp. 349-360. doi:10.1023/A:1021203017316
[12] U. K. Bindl, S. K. Parker and S. Zedeck, “Proactive Work Behavior: Forward-Thinking and Change-Oriented Action in Organizations,” APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2011, pp. 567- 598. doi:10.1037/12170-019
[13] T. J. Andersen, “Integrating Decentralized Strategy Making and Strategic Planning Processes in Dynamic Environments,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1271-1299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00475.x
[14] A. K. Gupta and V. Govindarajan, “Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2000, pp. 473-496. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)
[15] N. Phelps and C. Fuller, “Multinational Enterprises, Repeat Investment and the Role of Aftercare Services in Wales and Ireland,” Economic Geography, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2004, pp. 783-801. doi:10.1080/0034340042000265269
[16] T. E. Becker, “Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making?” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1992, pp. 232-244. doi:10.2307/256481
[17] G. Hirst, R. Van Dick and D. Van Knippenberg, “A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Employee Creativity,” Organizational Behavior, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2009, pp. 963-982. doi:10.1002/job.600
[18] S. W. O’Donnell, “Managing Foreign Subsidiaries: Agents of Headquarters, or an Interdependent Network?” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2000, pp. 525- 548. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5
[19] C. Boone and W. Hendriks, “Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Moderators of Functional- Background and Locus-of-Control Diversity,” Management Science, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2009, pp. 165-180.
[20] D. J. Mcallister, “Affect-And Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1995, pp. 24-59. doi:10.2307/256727
[21] R. M. Kanter, “The New Managerial Work,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1989, pp. 85-92.
[22] M. Osterloh and B. Frey, “Motivation, Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Forms,” Organization Science, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2000, pp. 538-550. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.538.15204
[23] T. Pedersen, B. Petersen and D. Sharma, “Knowledge Transfer Performance of Multinational Companies,” Management International Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2003, pp. 69-90.
[24] C. Inkpen, “Creating Knowledge through Collaboration,” California Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1996, pp. 123-140. doi:10.2307/41165879
[25] S. A. Zahra, “Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: an Exploratory Study,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1991, pp. 259-285. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A
[26] D. B. Minbaeva, “HRM Practices and MNC Knowledge Transfer,” Personnel Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2005, pp. 125-144. doi:10.1080/095851997341414
[27] K. Roth and D. Nigh, “The Effectiveness of Headquarters-subsidiary Relationships: The Role of Coordination, Control and Conflict,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 25, No. 54, 1992, pp. 277-301. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(92)90025-7
[28] A. M. Grant, S. Nurmohamed, S. J. Ashford and K. Dekas, “The Performance Implications of Ambivalent Initiative: The Interplay of Autonomous and Controlled Motivations,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 116, No. 2, 2011, pp. 241-251. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.004
[29] A. Persaud, “Enhancing Synergistic Innovative Capability in Multinational Corporations,” Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2005, pp. 412-629. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00138.x
[30] M. Subramaniam, “Integrating Cross-Border Knowledge for Transnational New Produce Development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2006, pp. 541-555. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00223.x
[31] J. Kickul, E. Belgio and M. Green “Emerging with Allies: The Role of Top Management Strategic Congruence in the Creation of Inter-Firm Relationships,” Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2004, p. 35. doi:10.1142/S0218495804000038
[32] Z. H. Zeng, “The Determinants of MNC Subsidiary’s Autonomy and Initiative: An Empirical Study of MNC Subsidiary in Taiwan,” Ph.D. Thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, 2007.
[33] M. Demirbag, E. Tatoglu, K. W. Glaister and S. Zaim, “Measuring Strategic Decision Making Efficiency in Different Country Contexts: A Comparison of British and Turkish Firms,” Omega, Vol. 38, No. 1-2, 2010, pp. 95- 104. doi:10.1016/
[34] M. L. Wu, “Structural Equation Model,” Chongqing University Publishing House, Chongqing, 2009.
[35] M. L. Bouillona, G. D. Ferrierb, M. T. Stuebs Jr. and T. D. Westb, “The Economic Benefit of Goal Congruence and Implications for Management Control Systems,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2006, pp. 265-298. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.03.003

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.