Share This Article:

Situating Cornerstone Propositions

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:95KB) PP. 260-267
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.24038    7,402 Downloads   16,081 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Ostensibly, Wittgenstein’s last remarks published in 1969 under the title On Certainty are about epistemology, more precisely about the problem of scepticism. This is the standard interpretation of On Certainty. But I contend, in this paper, that we will get closer to Wittgenstein’s intentions and perhaps find new and illuminating ways to interpret his late contribution if we keep in mind that his primary goal was not to provide an answer to scepticism. In fact, I think that the standard reading (independently of its fruitfulness with dealing with scepticism) leads to a distorted view of Wittgenstein’s contribution in On Certainty. In order to see that, scepticism will first be briefly characterised, and then I will attempt to circumscribe more precisely the standard reading of On Certainty. In section 4, three exegetical arguments against the standard reading are offered – the hope being that the weight of these three arguments, taken together, instils doubt in the reader’s mind about the correctness of the standard reading. The paper concludes with an attempt to gesture at the philosophical significance of On Certainty once we set aside the standard reading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Philie, P. (2012). Situating Cornerstone Propositions. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2, 260-267. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.24038.

References

[1] Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[2] Coliva, A. (2010). Moore and Wittgenstein. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230289697
[3] Gascoigne, N. (2002). Scepticism. London: Acumen.
[4] Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and illusion: Themes in the philosophy of Wittgenstein (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[5] Kerns, A. (2004). Understanding scepticism: Wittgenstein’s paradoxical reinterpretation of sceptical doubt. In D. McManus (Ed.), Wittgenstein and Scepticism (pp. 200-217). London: Routledge.
[6] McGinn, M. (1989). Sense and certainty: A Dissolution of scepticism. Oxford: Blackwell.
[7] McGinn, M. (2004). The everyday alternative to scepticism: Cavell and Wittgenstein on other minds. In D. McManus (Ed.), Wittgenstein and Scepticism (pp. 240-259). London: Routledge.
[8] Moore, G. E. (1925) A defense of common sense. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), G. E. Moore: Selected Writings (pp. 106-133). London: Routledge.
[9] Moore, G. E. (1939) Proof of an external world. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), G. E. Moore: Selected Writings (pp. 147-170). London: Routledge.
[10] Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2007). Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
[11] Moyal-Sharrock, D., & Brenner, W. H. (Eds.) (2007). Readings of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
[12] Rhees, R. (2003). Wittgenstein’s On Certainty: There—Like our life. Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470776247
[13] Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[14] Stern, R. (2000). Transcendental arguments and scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[15] Stroll, A. (1994). Moore and Wittgenstein On Certainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[16] Stroud, B. (1984). The Significance of philosophical scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi:10.1093/0198247613.001.0001
[17] Williams, M. (1991). Unnatural doubts. Oxford: Blackwell.
[18] Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
[19] Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. Oxford: Blackwell.
[20] Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Notebooks 1914-1916. Oxford: Blackwell.
[21] Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
[22] Wright, C. (1985). Facts and Certainty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 71, 429-472.
[23] Wright, C. (2001). Study note on Wittgenstein. Rails to Infinity: Essays on Themes from Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations (pp. 433-443). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
[24] Wright, C. (2002). (Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, 330-348. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x
[25] Wright, C. (2004a). Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free?). Proceedings of theAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 78, 167-212.
[26] Wright, C. (2004b). Wittgensteinian certainties. In D. McManus (Ed.), Wittgenstein and Scepticism (pp. 22-55). London: Routledge.
[27] Wright, C. (2007). The Perils of Dogmatism. In S. Nuccetelli, & G. Seay (Eds.), Themes from G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics (pp. 25-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.