Religion in an Oppressive Society: The Antebellum Example

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.24037   PDF   HTML     4,249 Downloads   6,501 Views   Citations


Religion: a socio-spiritual phenomenon that pervades and influences human actions in all realms of human existences plays diverse and divergent roles in the society. Therefore, it is difficult to define with a simply and a single category. Hence, on the one hand, Karl Marx saw it as an instrument that supports the status quo and oppresses the less privileged and the powerless and as such a vital force in the legitimization of social ills in the society. On the other hand, Marx Webber and other functional theorists maintain that religion as a social fact is a force in mobilizing social solidarity and unified actions against the social order. In this direction religion therefore plays revolutionary roles in any given society. Against the backdrop of the seeming contradicting and conflicting positions of these two main schools of thought in the field of sociology of religion, this paper is poised to reassess the divergent roles religion has played in history among the oppressed people of the world, using the both Marxian and Webberian paradigms as a matrix. This paper considers oppressive society as a society that maintains a social and economic classification of its members as a norm. It is also noted that it is through such classification of its members in their nexus that social injustice, discriminations, dehumanization are maintained. This situation is the defining paradigm of the global village (the new World Order), governed strictly by economic dictum. To this end therefore, this paper re-invokes the roles religion played in the ‘Antebellum’ America, with a view of applying the same in the modern era, which has great resemblance with the Antebellum America, in terms of oppression, though not in its magnitude.

Share and Cite:

Okoro, K. (2012). Religion in an Oppressive Society: The Antebellum Example. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2, 251-259. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2012.24037.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Adams, N. (1855). A Smith of view of slavery. New York: Pittman.
[2] Baer, H.A., & Singer (1992). African-American religion in the twenty century. Knox Ville: University of Tennessee Press.
[3] Beecroft, F. (1931). Slave trading in the old south. Baltimore: J/H. Hems.
[4] Billingsley, A. (1999). Mighty like a river: The black church and social reforms. New York: Oxford University Press.
[5] Blassingame, J. W. (1973). Black New Orleans 1860-1890. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
[6] Blassingame, J. W. (1998). The slave community (revised ed.). Mary Knoll: Charity Books.
[7] Cade, J. B. (1935). Out of the mouths of the ex-slaves. Journal of Negroes History, 20, 394-337. doi:10.2307/2714721
[8] Christian, K. J. (2008). Sociology of religion and contemporary development. Lamlam, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
[9] Cobb, T. R. R. (1858). An Inquiry into the law of slavery in United States of America. Philadelphia: J. J. W. Johnson.
[10] Elkins, S. M. (1959). Slavery: A problem in American institutional and intellectual life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[11] Elkins, S. M. (nd). Slavery in capitalist and non-capitalist cultures. In L. Foner, & E. D. Genovese (Eds.), Slavery in the New World. Englewood Cliffs: N. J Princeton Hall Inc.
[12] Goodell, W. (1853). The American slave code in theory and practice. New York: America and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society
[13] Harura, J. (1910). The negro in the new world. London: Methuen.
[14] Hurd, S. G. (1851). The law of freedom and bondage. New York: Harpers Brothers.
[15] Jernegam, M. W. (1916). Slavery and conversion in American colonies. America Historical Review, 21, 504-527. doi:10.2307/1835009
[16] Logsdon, J. (1969). Diary of slave recollection and property. Seven on Black: Reflection of Noges. Philadelphia: J. B. Lepinccott.
[17] Lone, J. H. (1970). Black consciousness and the black church: A historical theological interpretation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 23.
[18] Mellowes, M. (2010). God in American: The black church.
[19] Miller, R. M. (1998). Religion and American Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[20] Munford, B. B (1909). Virginia’s attitude towards slavery and secession: New York: Longman.
[21] Noll, M. (2006). The civil war as a theological crises. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
[22] Raboteau, A. J. (1978). Slave religion: The invisible institutions in the antiebellum south. Glasgow: Oxford University
[23] Randall, M. M., Stout, H. S., & Charles, R. (Eds.) (1998). Religion and the American Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[24] Reek, G. R. (1982). Black radical consciousness and black Christian experience. Sociological Analysis, 43, 153-169.
[25] Scheiner, S. M. (1969). The church and the north city 1890-1930. In W. Shade, & R. C. Herenkohl (Eds.), Seven on Black: Reflections on the Negro Experience in America. Philadelphia: J. B Lippincott Company.
[26] Shade, W. G., & Herrenkohl, R. C. (1969). Seven on black: Reflections on the negro experience in America. Philadelphia: J. B Lippincott Company.
[27] Shagor, H. (2005). Marx and religion: A brief study. New York: Orbiss Books.
[28] Swatos, W. (2011). Encyclopedia of religion and society. Hartford: Institute for Research, Hartford Seminary.
[29] Townsley, J. (2004) Marx, Webber and Durkheim on religion. New York: Orbiss Books.
[30] Uchegbue, C. (1997). Karl Marx Theory of Religion. In G. O. Ozumba (Ed.), The Great Philosophers (Vol. 2). Aba: Vitalis Books.
[31] Ulrich, P. B. (1999). A documentary history of American industrial society. Cleverland: Aunther H. Clark.
[32] Wilmore, G. S. (1983). Black religion and black radicalism. New York: Mary Knoll.
[33] Wilmore, G. S. (1973). Black religion and black radicalism: An examination of the black experience in religion. New York: Anchor Books.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.