Relationship between Trading Volume and Asymmetric Volatility in the Korean Stock Market

DOI: 10.4236/me.2012.35077   PDF   HTML     5,555 Downloads   8,781 Views   Citations

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between return volatility and trading volume as a proxy for the arrival of information to the market, based on Korean stock market (KSM) data from January 2000 to December 2010. We measured the rela- tionship between return volatility and trading volume using the GJR-GARCH and exponential GARCH (EGARCH) models. We found a positive relationship between trading volume and volatility, suggesting that trading volume influ- ences the flow of information to the market. This finding supports the validity of the mixture of distributions hy-pothesis. Considering that trading volume can also explain volatility asymmetry, we conclude that trading volume is a useful tool for predicting the volatility dynamics of the KSM.

Share and Cite:

K. Choi, Z. Jiang, S. Kang and S. Yoon, "Relationship between Trading Volume and Asymmetric Volatility in the Korean Stock Market," Modern Economy, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2012, pp. 584-589. doi: 10.4236/me.2012.35077.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] D. B. Nelson, “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach,” Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 2, 1991, pp. 323-370. doi:10.2307/2938260
[2] R. F. Engle and V. K. Ng, “Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No.5, 1993, pp. 1749-1778. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05127.x
[3] T. E. Copeland, “A model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1976, pp. 1149-1168. doi:10.2307/2326280
[4] P. K. Clark, “A Subordinated Sto-chastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices,” Economet- rica, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1973, pp. 135-155. doi:10.2307/1913889
[5] T. W. Epps and M. L. Epps, “The stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transac-tion Volumes: Im- plications for the Mixture-of-Distributions Hypothesis,” Econometrica, Vol. 44, No. 2, 1976, pp. 305-321. doi:10.2307/1912726
[6] L. Harris, “Cross-Security Tests of the Mixture of Distri- butions Hypothesis,” Journal Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1986, pp. 39-46. doi:10.2307/2330989
[7] C. G. Lamoureux and W. D. La-strapes, “Heteroskedastic- ity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Ef- fects,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1990, pp. 221- 229. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05088.x
[8] G. M. Gallo and B. Pacini, “The Effects of Trading Ac- tivity on Market Vola-tility,” European Journal of Fi- nance, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2000, pp. 163-175. doi:10.1080/13518470050020824
[9] A. J. Foster, “Vo-lume-Volatility Relationship for Crude Oil Futures Markets,” Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1995, pp. 929-951. doi:10.1002/fut.3990150805
[10] A. Alsubaie and M. Najand, “Trading Volume, Time- Varying Conditional Volatility, and Asymmetric Volatil- ity Spillover in the Saudi Stock Market,” Journal of Mul- tinational Financial Management, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2009, pp. 139-159. doi:10.1016/j.mulfin.2008.09.002
[11] J. L. Sharma, M. Mbodja and R. Kamath, “Heteroscedas- ticity in Stock Market Indicator Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects,” Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1996, pp. 337-342. doi:10.1080/096031096334132
[12] C. S. Lee, “A Study on the Trading Volume and Market Volatility,” Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2009, pp. 495-511.
[13] S. C. An, S. W. Jang and S. H. Lee, “A Study on the Lead-Lag Relation between the Trading Volume and the Return Volatility in the KSE,” Management & Economy Re-search, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2006, pp. 19-33.
[14] S. A. Kim and Y. J. Kim, “An Examination of the Return Volatility-Volume Re-lationship using TGARCH Model in KOSPI200 Futures,” Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1161-1181.
[15] R. F. Engle, “Autoregressvie condi-tional heteroscedastic- ity with Estimates of the variance of United Kingdom in- flation,” Ecomometrica, Vol. 50, No. 4, 1982, pp. 987- 1007. doi:10.2307/1912773
[16] T. Bollerslev, “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometric, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1986, pp. 307-327. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
[17] L. R. Glosten, R. Jagannathan and D. E. Runkle, “On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks,” Journal of Fi- nance, Vol. 48, No. 5, 1993, pp. 1779-1801. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.