Share This Article:

Export Comparative Advantage Analysis of Iranian Hen Egg by RCA & RSCA and RC Criteria

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:155KB) PP. 553-556
DOI: 10.4236/me.2012.35072    5,107 Downloads   8,018 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The potential impact of a liberalization of global trade on developing nations is a controversial subject. The liberaliza-tion of global agricultural trade, in particular, has been the focus of the debate for many years now and is part of the current WTO negotiations. Trade policies are believed to have influenced a country’s comparative advantage. Comparative advantage as a concept for evaluating the patterns of trade, is widely accepted and often used in theoretical and policy discussions. Livestock and livestock products, in the global trade, account for about one sixth, by value, of all agricultural trade. Iran is the one of main producers of hen egg in the world (FAO, 2004). Higher-than-global cost prices are the main disadvantage of the Iranian hen egg industry. The industry comprises of 700 million broiler day-old chicks, 10 million broiler breeders and 50 million layer day-old chicks. Hen egg is one of the Livestock products which are part of the non-oil export in Iran and its export consistently faces with fluctuation during last years. This paper looks at the performance of hen egg export and examines the comparative advantages indices like: revealed comparative advantage (RCA), revealed symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) and (revealed competitive advantage(RC) for Iran and world main producers over the period 1990-2005. The source of data from 1990-2005 are supplied by F.A.O (2006). The changes in Iran’s export structure were compared with main producers ones. The results of the research showed, the trade and production policies and economic behavior of producers and exporters have been in such a way that they could not show a appropriate and timely response of world, also the re-vealed instabilities in the trends of RCA, RSCA and RC indices during the study period led to the conclusion that there is no well defined strategy and plan for utilization of low price production factors, effectiveness human power, knowledge of bargaining power and target markets. The objective of this paper is to try to identify: 1) The export comparative advantage of Iranian hen egg; 2) Its changing during the time; 3) The comparative advantage of Iranian hen egg in competition with other countries which are famous in trade and production of hen egg.

Cite this paper

F. Mirzaei, S. Mostafa Mostafavi and S. Yazdani, "Export Comparative Advantage Analysis of Iranian Hen Egg by RCA & RSCA and RC Criteria," Modern Economy, Vol. 3 No. 5, 2012, pp. 553-556. doi: 10.4236/me.2012.35072.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Food and Agriculture Organization, “Trade Yearbook,” 2006. www.fao.org
[2] F. Mirzaei, S. Yazdani and A. A. Gharah-daghi, “Survey on Comparative Advantage of Chicken Meat Export of Iran in the World,” The 2nd Iranian Poultry Science Seminar, Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, 29-30 Jan-uary 2003, pp. 150-155.
[3] B. Balassa, “Trade Liberalization and Revealed Com- parative Advantage,” The Manchester School of Eco- nomic and Social Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1965, pp. 99- 123.
[4] J. B. Donges and J. Riedel, “The Expansion of Manufac- tured Exports in Developing Countries: An Em-pirical As- sessment of Supply and Demand Issues,” Review of World Economics, Vol. 113, No. 1, 1977, pp. 58-87. doi:10.1007/BF02696566
[5] K. Kunimoto, “Typology of Trade Intensity Indices,” Hi- totsubashi Journal of Economics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1977, pp. 15-32.
[6] H. P. Bowen, “On the Theoretical Interpretation of Trade Intensity and Revealed Comparative Advantage,” Review of World Economics, Vol. 119, No. 3, 1983, pp. 464-472. doi:10.1007/BF02706520
[7] T. L. Vollrath, “A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Ad- vantage,” Review of World Economics, Vol. 127, No. 2, 1991, pp. 265-280. doi:10.1007/BF02707986
[8] B. Dalum, K. Laursen and G. Villumsen, “Structural Change in OECD Export Specialization Patterns: De-Specialisa- tion and Stickiness,’’ International Review Applied Eco- nomics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1998, pp. 447-467.
[9] H. Salami and E. Pishbahar, “Changes in the Patterns of Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in Iran; An Empirical Analysis Based on the Revealed Compara- tive Advantage Indices,” Agricultural Economics and De- ve-lopment Scientific & Research Quarterly Journal, Vol. 34, No. 9, 2001, pp. 67-99

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.