Biological Communication Behavior through Information Technology Implementation in Learning Accelerated

Deni Darmawan

Department of Educational Technology, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung, Indonesia.

DOI: 10.4236/ijcns.2012.58056                

Abstract

The Biological Communication Behavior of the Left and the Right Brains have been constructed through the explanation of the phenomena of their specific part activities encompassing: Prefrontal, Frontal, Parietal, Central, Occipital and Parasagital which have been significantly tested in terms of their impacts in learning acceleration starting from Elementary School to University levels. This study is conducted by means of constructive approach and it employs both the quantitative and qualitative techniques. The result of the study shows that the biological communication of the left and the right brains are reliably tested scientifically from the viewpoint of science. The Problem Based Learning start from elementary school to university level of both social and science groups.

Keywords

Biological Communication; ICT; Learning Accelerated

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Republic of Indonesia Ministry of National Education, “Development of ICT Policy in Indonesia,” 2011.
[2]	D. Darmawan, “Learning Communication,” Humaniora, Bandung, 2007.
[3]	E. Jensen, “Brain Based Learning,” The Brain Store, San Diego, 2003.
[4]	Basic Education Project, “Monitoring and Evaluation Program,” Educational Ministry of Province, West Java, 2003.
[5]	D. Darmawan, “Classroom Action Research: Lateral Acceleration Computer Based Tutorials in Learning Mathematics,” Institute for Research Cooperation with Indonesia University of Education, Ministry of Higher Education, London, 2003, p. 55.
[6]	A. Kadir and T. C. Triwahyuni, “Introduction to Information Technology,” Yogyakarta Andi Publisher, Yogyakarta, 2003.
[7]	D. Darmawan, “Information and Communication Technology,” Arum Mandiri Press, Bandung, 2007.
[8]	S. M. Allesi and S. R. Trollip, “Computer Based Instruction,” Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1984.
[9]	W. B. John, H. Poortinga, M. H. Segall and P. R. Dasen, “Cross-Cultural Psychology,” Scholastic, New York, 1999.
[10]	G. Pope, “Biological Anthropology,” Eagle, New York, 1984.
[11]	J. Brannen, “Guiding Qualitative and Quantitative Research,” UI, Jakarta, 1997.
[12]	M. D. Gall and R. W. Borg, “Operations Research in Education,” McMillan, Inc., New York, 2003.
[13]	E. Niedermeyer and F. L. da Silva, “Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields,” Williams & Wilkins A. Waverly Company, Baltimore, 1993.
[14]	D. Mulyana, “Qualitative Research Methodology,” 2nd Edition, Teen Rosdakarya, Bandung, 2002.
[15]	S. A. Yustiani, “Kahdar Based on Discussion about EEG,” 2005.
[16]	M. B. Milles and A. M. Huberman, “Qualitative Data Analysis,” Rineka Copyright, Jakarta, 1992, p. 20.
[17]	C. C. Li, “Path Analysis—A Primer,” The Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, 1975.
[18]	C. Rose and M. J. Nicholl, “Accelerated Learning for the 21st Century,” Del Publishing, Inc., New York, 1997.
[19]	S. Nurhalim. “Fostering Creativity towards a Global Era,” Alumni, Bandung, 2003.
[20]	N. W. Sham, “Tree Reconstruction Perspective Communication Studies Communication and Development Communication Paradigm Shift in Era of Globalization,” Inauguration Speech Communication Professor of FIKOM Padjadjaran University, Bandung, 2001.
[21]	R. Jalalludin, “Intelligent Learning,” Brain-Muthahari Press, Bandung, 2003.
[22]	Fajar, “Learning Theory,” PGSD UNY., Semarang, 2012, p. 14.
[23]	D. Klahr and J. G. Wallace, “Cognitive Development,” Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, 1976, pp. 189-223.