Tempospect Theory of Intertemporal Choice


Anomalies in intertemporal choice (e.g. hyperbolic discounting, subadditive discounting, a sign effect, a magnitude effect, and a delay-speedup asymmetry) have been investigated in neuroeconomics and behavioral neuroeconomics. In this study we propose a “tempospect” theory of intertemporal choice which can account for these anomalies in intertemporal choice. The key features of the present theory are: 1) decision over time is made with psychological time; and 2) psychological time is determined by a change in delay until receipt (i.e., positive or negative time-interval between options); 3) psychological time is less sensitive to a decrease in delay in comparison to an increase in delay; and 4) psychological time is influenced by the sign and magnitude of the delayed outcomes. Implications of the present theory for neuroeconomics are discussed.

Share and Cite:

Takahashi, T. & Han, R. (2012). Tempospect Theory of Intertemporal Choice. Psychology, 3, 555-557. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.38082.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Al-Nowaihi, A., & Dhami, S. (2006). A note on the Loewenstein-Prelec theory of intertemporal choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 52, 99-108. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2006.04.001
[2] Al-Nowaihi, A., & Dhami, S. (2009). A value function that explains the magnitude and sign effects. Economics Letters, 105, 224-229. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.08.004
[3] Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96, 73-86. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961736.x
[4] Cajueiro, D. (2006). A note on the relevance of the q-exponential function in the context of intertemporal choices. Physica A, 364, 385-388. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2005.08.056
[5] Destefano, N., & Martinez, A. (2011). The additive property of the inconsistency degree in intertemporal decision making through the generalization of psychophysical laws. Physica A, 390, 1763-1772. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.01.016
[6] Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Holt, D. (2006). Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory and Cognition, 34, 914-928. doi:10.3758/BF03193437
[7] Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401. doi:10.1257/002205102320161311
[8] Kable, J., & Glimcher, P. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1625- 1633. doi:10.1038/nn2007
[9] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory—Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291. doi:10.2307/1914185
[10] Loewenstein, G. (1988). Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science, 34, 200-214. doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.2.200
[11] Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and Interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573-597. doi:10.2307/2118482
[12] McClure, S., Laibson, D., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503-507. doi:10.1126/science.1100907
[13] Read, D. (2001). Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 23, 5-32. doi:10.1023/A:1011198414683
[14] Read, D., & Roelofsma, P. (2003). Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 140-153. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00060-8
[15] Samuelson, P. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studie, 4, 155-161. doi:10.2307/2967612
[16] Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 117, 925-944. doi:10.1037/a0019619
[17] Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2006). Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of intertemporal choice. Management Science, 52, 1424-1436. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0534
[18] Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 165-180. doi:10.2307/2295722
[19] Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 691-693. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2005.04.040
[20] Takahashi, T. (2006). Time-estimation error following Weber-Fechner law may explain subadditive time-discounting. Medical Hypotheses, 67, 1372-1374. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2006.05.056
[21] Thaler, R. H. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201-207. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7
[22] Takahashi, T. (2007). A comparison of intertemporal choices for oneself versus someone else based on Tsallis' statistics. Physica A, 385, 637-644. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.020
[23] Takahashi, T., Oono, H., & Radford, M. (2007). Empirical estimation of consistency parameter in intertemporal choice based on Tsallis’ statistics. Physica A, 381, 338-342. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.03.038
[24] Takahashi, T. (2009). Theoretical frameworks for neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 2, 75-90. doi:10.1037/a0015463
[25] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory- cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574
[26] Zauberman, G., Kim, B., Malkoc, S., & Bettman, J. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 543- 556. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.4.543

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.