Share This Article:

Urban Forest and Tree Valuation Using Discounted Cash Flow Analysis: Impact of Economic Components

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:318KB) PP. 174-181
DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2012.23021    6,703 Downloads   14,515 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Discounted cash flow analysis is one of the standard methods used to value urban forests and trees. It involves calculating today’s value for all benefits and costs attributed to an investment; that is discounting all cash flows to today’s value using an appropriate interest rate. This requires each benefit and cost be stated in terms of its cash flow. Urban tree benefits are complex. Little notice is given to the components of these benefits. Total urban tree benefits are a summation of partial benefits, including property value increase, storm water reduction, air quality improvement, carbon sequestration, natural gas savings, and electricity savings. We discuss the nature of these partial benefits, especially the geographical, temporal, diameter size, and rate of growth differences. These differences are even reflected in nursery stock valuation. Net present value analysis is used to illustrate the impact of these differences on financial return. An understanding of these components will prove valuable to those attempting to estimate urban forest and tree benefits.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Peterson, K. & Straka, T. (2012). Urban Forest and Tree Valuation Using Discounted Cash Flow Analysis: Impact of Economic Components. Open Journal of Forestry, 2, 174-181. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2012.23021.

References

[1] Abbott, R. E., & Miller, K. C. (1987). Estimating and pricing tree care jobs. Journal of Arboriculture, 13, 118-120.
[2] American Forests (2001). Urban ecosystem analysis Atlanta Metro Area: Calculating the value of nature. Washington, DC: American Forests.
[3] Anderson, L. M., & Cordell, H. K. (1985). Residential property values improve by landscaping with trees. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 9, 1162-166.
[4] Arenas, J. P. (2008). Potential problems with environmental sound barriers when used in mitigating surface traffic noise. Science of the Total Environment, 405, 173-179.
[5] Bates, C. G. (1945). Shelterbelt influences II. The value of shelterbelts in home heating. Journal of Forestry, 43, 176-196.
[6] Binkley, D., & Giardina, C. (1998). Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry, 42, 89-106. doi:10.1023/A:1005948126251
[7] Bullard, S. H., & Straka, T .J. (1998). Basic concepts in forest valuation and investment analysis (2nd ed.). Jackson, MS: Forestry Suppliers.
[8] Buresh, R. J., and Tian, G. (1998). Soil improvement by trees in subSaharan Africa. Agroforestry, 38, 51-76. doi:10.1023/A:1005948326499
[9] Burger, J. A. (2009). Management effects on growth, production and sustainability of managed forest ecosystems: Past trends and future directions. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 2335-2346. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.015
[10] Casey Trees and Davey Tree Expert Company (2012). National tree benefit calculator. URL (last checked 25 May 2012).
[11] http://treebenefits.com/calculator.
[12] Davis, L. S., Johnson, K. N., Bettinger, P., & Howard T. E. (2001). Forest management: To sustain ecological, economic, and social values (4th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
[13] Dewalle, D. R., & Heisler, G. M. (1988). Use of windbreaks for home energy conservation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 22-23, 243-260. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(88)90024-2
[14] Dwyer, J. F., Schroeder, H. W., Louvierre, J. L., & Anderson, D. H. (1989). Urbanites willingness to pay for trees and forests in recreation areas. Journal of Arboriculture, 15, 247-252.
[15] Dwyer, J. F., Schroeder, H. W., & Gobster, P. H. (1991). The significance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper understanding of values. Journal of Arboriculture, 17, 276-284.
[16] Dwyer, J. F., McPherson, E. G., Schroeder, H. W., & Rowntree, R. A. (1992). Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18, 227-235.
[17] Graves, A. R., Burgess, P. J., Liagre, F., Terreaux, J. P., & Dupraz, C. (2005). Development and use of a framework for characterizing computerized models for silvorable economics. Agroforestry Systems, 65, 53-65. doi:10.1007/s10457-004-5545-0
[18] Hamada, S., & Ohta, T. (2010). Seasonal variations in the cooling effect of urban green areas on the surrounding urban areas. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 9, 15-24. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.10.002
[19] Hardin, P. J., & Jensen, R. R. (2007). The effect of urban leaf area on summertime urban surface kinetic temperatures: A Terra Haute case study. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6, 63-72. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.01.005
[20] He, J., & Hoyano, A. (2009). The effects of windbreak forests on the summer thermal environment in a residence. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 8, 291-298. doi:10.3130/jaabe.8.291
[21] Heisler, G. M. (1986). Effects of individual trees on the solar radiation climate of small buildings. Urban Ecology, 9, 337-359. doi:10.1016/0304-4009(86)90008-2
[22] Herrington, L. P. (1974). Trees and acoustics in urban areas. Journal of Forestry, 72, 462-465.
[23] Jim, C. Y. & Chen, W. Y. (2010). External effects of neighborhood parks and landscape elements on high-rise residential value. Land Use Policy, 27, 662-670. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.027
[24] Johnson, B. E. (2008). Nature, affordability, and privacy as motivations for exurban living. Urban Geography, 29, 705-723. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.29.7.705
[25] Joye, Y., Willems, K., Brengman, M., & Wolf, K. (2010). The effects. of urban retail greenery on consumer experience: Reviewing the evidence from a restoration perspective. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9, 57-64. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.10.001
[26] Klemperer, W. D. (1996). Forest resource economics and finance. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[27] Leonard, R. E., & Parr, S. B. (1970). Trees as a sound barrier. Journal of Forestry, 68, 282-283.
[28] Lin, X.-J., Barrington, S., Choinière, D., & Prasher, S. (2007). Simulation of the effect of windbreaks on odour dispersion. Biosystems Engineering, 3, 347-363. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng. 2007.07.010
[29] Lorenzo, A. B., Blanche, C. A., Qi, Y., & Guidry, M. M. (2000). Assessing residents’ willingness to pay to preserve the community urban forest: A small-city case. Journal of Arboriculture, 26, 319-325.
[30] Martin, C. W. Maggio, R. C., & Appel, D. N. (1989). The contributory value of trees to residential property in Austin, Texas Metropolitan Area. Journal of Arboriculture, 15, 72-76.
[31] Matsuoka, R. H., & Kaplan, R. (2008). People’s needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 7-19. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
[32] McPherson, E. G., Herrington, L. P., & Heisler, G .M. (1988). Impacts of vegetation on residential property values. Energy and Buildings, 12, 41-51. doi:10.1016/0378-7788(88)90054-0
[33] McPherson, E. G. (1992). Accounting for the benefits and costs of urban greenspace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 22, 41-51. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(92)90006-L
[34] McPherson, E. G., & Rowntree, R. A. (1993). Energy conservation potential of urban tree planting. Journal of Arboriculture, 19, 321-331.
[35] McPherson, E. G., Scott, K. I., & Simpson, J. R. (1998). Estimating cost effectiveness of residential yard trees for improving air quality in Sacramento, California, using existing models. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 75-84.
[36] McPherson, E. G. (1999). Benefit-cost analysis of Modesto’s municipal urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 25, 235-248.
[37] McPherson, E. G., & Simpson, J. R. (2002). A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1, 61-74. doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00007
[38] McPherson, E. G., Simpson, J. R., Peper, P.J., Maco, S.E., & Xiao, Q. (2005). Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. Journal of Forestry 103, 411-416.
[39] Nair, P. K. R., Nair, V. D., Kumar, B. M., & Haile, S. G. (2009). Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: A feasibility approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 1099-1111. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.010
[40] Nielsen, A. B., & M?ller, F. (2008). Is coppice a potential for urban forestry? The social perspective. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7, 129-138. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2008.02.005
[41] Nilsson, K., Sangster, M., Gallis, C., Hartig, T., deVries, S., Seeland, K., & Schipperijn, J. (Eds.) (2011). Forests, Trees and Human Health. New York, NY: Springer.
[42] Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8, 225-235. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
[43] Nowak, D. J. (1993). Atmospheric carbon reduction by urban trees. Journal of Environmental Management, 37, 207-217. doi:10.1006/jema.1993.1017
[44] Nowak, D. J., & Crane, D. E. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116, 381-389. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7
[45] Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Dwyer, J.F. (2002). Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture, 28, 194199.
[46] Nowak, D. J., Walton, J. T., Dwyer, J. F., Kaya, L. G., & Myeong, S. (2005). The increasing influence of urban environments on US forest management. Journal of Forestry, 103, 377-382.
[47] Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Stevens, J. C. (2006). Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4, 115-123. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007
[48] Peterson, K. S., & Straka, T. J. (2011). Specialized discounted cash flow analysis formulas for valuation of benefits and costs of urban trees and forests. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 37, 200-206.
[49] Price, C. (2003). Quantifying the aesthetic benefits of urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1, 123-133. doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00013
[50] Rowntree, R. A. (1984). Forest canopy cover and land use in four Eastern United States cities. Urban Ecology, 8, 55-67. doi:10.1016/0304-4009(84)90006-8
[51] Sanders, R. A. (1984). Some determinants of urban forest structure. Urban Ecology, 8, 13-27. doi:10.1016/0304-4009(84)90004-4
[52] Sanders, R. A. (1986). Urban forest vegetation impacts on the urban hydrology of Dayton, Ohio. Urban Ecology, 9, 361-376. doi:10.1016/0304-4009(86)90009-4
[53] Sherwood, S. C., & Betters, D. R. (1981). Benefit-cost analysis of mu-nicipal Dutch elm disease control programs in Colorado. Journal of Arboriculture, 7, 291-298.
[54] Silva, F. O. T., Wehmann, A., Henze, H-J, & Model, N. (2006). Ability of plant-based surface technology to improve urban water cycle and mesoclimate. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4, 145-158. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2005.12.004
[55] Sinden, J. A., & Worrell, A. C. (1979). Underprice values: Decisions without market prices. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
[56] Stenger, A., Harou, P., & Navrud, S. (2009). Valuing environmental goods and services derived from forests. Journal of Forest Economics, 15, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.001
[57] Stump, L. M., & Binkley, D. (1993). Relationship between litter quality and nitrogen availability in Rocky Mountain forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 492-502. doi:10.1139/x93-067
[58] Templeton, S. R., & Goldman, G. (1996). Urban forestry adds $3.8 billion to California economy. California Agriculture, 50, 6-10. doi:10.3733/ca.v050n01p6
[59] Tietenberg, T. H., & Lewis, L. (2008). Environmental and natural resource economics (8th ed.). Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
[60] Tyrv?inen, L., & Miettinen, A. (2000). Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 206-223.
[61] Tyrv?inen, L., & V??n?nen, H. (1998). The economic value of urban forest amenities: An application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 43, 106-118.
[62] Tyrv?inen, L., Silvennoinen, H., & Kolehmainen, O. (2003).Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1, 135-149. doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00014
[63] Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.
[64] USDA Forest Service (2012). Urban Forest Effects Model—UFORE. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station. URL (last checked 25 May 2012). http://nrs.fs.fed.us/tools/ufore
[65] Velande, M. D., Fry, G., & Tviet, M. (2007). Urban forestry for human health and well-being. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 195197. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.09.001
[66] Walsh, R. G., Ward, F. A., & Olienyk, J. P. (1989). Recreational demand for trees in national forests. Journal of Environmental Management, 28, 255-268.
[67] Wolf, K. (2004). What could we lose? The economic value of urban forests. Proceedings of sixth Canadian urban forest conference (pp. 21-28). Ottawa, Ontario: Tree Canada Foundation.
[68] Wright, B. (1988). Forested windbreaks. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 22-23, 261-280.
[69] Yang, J., McBride, J., Zhou, J., & Sun, Z. (2005). The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban Forest & Urban Greening, 3, 65-78. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2004.09.001
[70] Zhang, Y., Hussain, A., Deng, J., & Letson, N. (2007). Public attitudes toward trees and supporting urban tree programs. Environment and Behavior, 39, 797-814. doi:10.1177/0013916506292326
[71]

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.