Creep Function Parameter Analysis for Optimum Design with Calcium Carbonate Nanofiller – Polypropylene Composite


This paper is about the use of power law model to fit experimental creep data of PP reinforced with calcium carbonate nanofiller at 10% optimum volume fraction with a view to characterizing the new material (PPC2) parametrically. The creep parameters were evaluated for neat (PPC0) and reinforced PP (PPC2) to establish the influence of reinforcement on the creep variables like creep rate and creep activation energy. The coefficient parameter A estimated within the stress level range 13.08MPa-22.88MPa has the range 0.0165-0.0651 while the exponent parameter n has 0.299-0.370. The creep stress coefficient K and exponent m has the respective values 161.495 and 0.3288 for PPC0 and 1881.4965 and 0.5448 for PPC2. The value of the parameter p similar to Larson-Miller has the value 4014.1871. Two creep function models used found that PPC0 has higher activation energy with value 9.3642E-20 J/mol for the stress 13.08MPa and PPC2 has values for the stresses 13.08MPa, 19.61MPa and 22.88MPa as 5.55998E- 20J/mol,5.4573E-20J/mol and 4.845E-20J/mol respectively. Of the two master curves produced, that following Larson-Miller parameter is recommended as the relationship between lnσ and parameter f(σ) is relatively linear and will give better results than the curve assumed to follow Sherby-Dorn that will give average result.

Share and Cite:

C. Ihueze, C. Mgbemena and E. Nnuka, "Creep Function Parameter Analysis for Optimum Design with Calcium Carbonate Nanofiller – Polypropylene Composite," Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, Vol. 10 No. 1, 2011, pp. 27-48. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2011.101003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Ritchie, R.O. “Mechanical Behaviour of materials lectures notes” University of California, Berkeley. Rhoads, 1993.
[2] Eiras, D and Pessan, L.A. “Crystallization behaviour of Polypropylene/Calcium carbonate nanocomposites”.Technical paper presented on the 11th International Conference on Advanced materials at Rio de Janeiro Brazil September p.20-25,2009.
[3] Hanim. H, et al. “The Effect of Calcium carbonate Nano-filler on the mechanical properties and crystallization behaviour of Polypropylene”, Malaysian Polymer Journal (MPJ), 2008, Vol 3, No. 12, p 38-49.
[4] Xie X.L, Q.X. Liu, R.K.Y.Li, X.P. Zhou, Q.X. Zhang, Z. Z. Yu and Y.Mai,“Rheological and Mechanical properties of PVC/ CaCO3 Nanocomposites prepared by In-situ polymerization”, Polymer, 2004 45, p.6665-6673.
[5] Di Lorenzo, M.L,Enrico.M.E,and Avell, M. “Thermal and Morphological Characterization of Poly(ethylene terepthalate)/ Calcium Carbonate Nano composites”, Journal of material service, 2002, 37, p.2351-2358.
[6] Chan C.M, Wu J, Li J.X, and Cheung Y.K. “Polypropylene /Calcium Carbonate Nano composites”, Polymer, 2000, 43, p.2981-2992.
[7] Benham,P.P., and Warnock,F. V.,Mechanics of solids and structures ,1981, Pitman, p537-539
[8] Al-Ganainy, G.S ,Nagy, N.R,Khalifa B A and Afify R. Creep and Structure and Structure Parameters Near the Transformation Temperature of Sn-1wt% Pl Alloy, 2002, Egypt J.Sol., Vol.(25), No. (1) p57.
[9] Muben, A. Machine Design, 4ed, Khanna Publishers, 2003, Delhi. p915-937.
[10] Ihueze C.C. and Mgbemenna, C. Effects of Reinforcement Combinations of Calcium Carbonate Nanofiller on the Mechanical and Creep Properties of Polypropylene, 2010, JMMCE (under review).
[11] Crawford, R.J. Plastics Engineering, 3rd ed, 1988, BUTTERWORTH, HEINMANN, Oxford, P46
[12] Chapara, S. C. and Canale R.P. Numerical Methods for Engineers with Programming Software Applications, 1988, McGraw-Hill, Toronto p450-453.
[13] Halliday, D and Resnick, R. Fundamentals of Physics ,2ed,1981,John Wiley and Sons inc, New York,p381.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.