Exploring the Nature of Information Systems Development Methodology: A Synthesized View Based on a Literature Review

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2010.32033   PDF   HTML     6,147 Downloads   11,101 Views   Citations


New Information Systems Development Methodologies (ISDMs) are suggested in the belief that their deployment would be beneficial to consultants in their work. A large number of ISDMs already exist but their value has been questioned and at the same time new methodologies continue to be introduced in an attempt to support and improve the practice of information systems development work. What is not always clear from current studies is that ISDM is a multi-perspective and cross-discipline phenomenon. Although a large amount of knowledge of ISDM is available, different disciplinary interests have resulted in fragmented assessments of it. This paper intends to identify theoretical perspectives applied in the conceptualization of ISDM. A review of the literature on ISDM was conducted and four different theoretical perspectives were identified: 1) system, 2) structure, 3) innovation, and 4) knowledge. While each perspective provides various overarching depictions of ISDM, the synthesized view of ISDM provided in this study reveals the complexities and ambiguities of a multifaceted phenomenon such as ISDM. Suggestions for an alternative conceptualization of ISDM are provided in an attempt to facilitate the investigation of ISDM.

Share and Cite:

D. Mihailescu and M. Mihailescu, "Exploring the Nature of Information Systems Development Methodology: A Synthesized View Based on a Literature Review," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2010, pp. 265-271. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2010.32033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] P. Backlund, C. Hallenborg and G. Hallgrimsson, “Transfer of Development Process Knowledge through Method Adaptation and Implementation,” Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference in Information Systems, Naples, Italy, June 18-21, 2003, pp. 122-125.
[2] J. Iivari, R. Hirschheim and H. K. Klein, “Towards a Distinctive Body of Knowledge for Information Systems Experts: Coding ISD Process Knowledge in Two IS Journals,” Information Systems Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2004, pp. 313-342.
[3] B. Fitzgerald, N. L. Russo and E. Stolterman, “Information Systems Development: Methods in Action,” McGraw- Hill Education, London, 2002.
[4] J. Iivari, R. Hirschheim and H. K. Klein, “A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2000, pp. 179-218.
[5] D. K. Hitchins, “Systems Methodology,” 2007. http:// www.hitchins.net/SysMethodology.html
[6] L. D. Introna and E. A. Whitley, “Against Method-Ism: Exploring the Limits of Method,” Information Technology & People, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1997, pp. 31-45.
[7] K. Lyytinen and D. Robey, “Learning Failure in Information Systems Development,” Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1999, pp. 85-101.
[8] L. Mathiassen, “Reflective Systems Development,” Scan- dinavian Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 67-117.
[9] D. Truex, R. A. Baskerville and J. Travis, “Amethodical Systems Development: The Deferred Meaning of Systems Development Methods,” Accounting, Management and Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2000, pp. 53-79.
[10] C. Ciborra, “The Labyrinth of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.
[11] D. Avison and G. Fitzgerald, “Information System Development. Methodologies, Techniques and Tools,” 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.
[12] Von L. Bertalanffy, “General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications,” George Braziller, New York, 1968.
[13] D. Kafura, “A Survey of Software Metrics,” Proceedings of the 1985 ACM Annual Conference on the Range of Computing: Mid-80’s Perspective, Denver, Colorado, 1985, pp. 502-506.
[14] P. Tarr, H. Ossher, W. Harrison and Jr. S. M. Sutton, “Degrees of Separation: Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns,” Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA, May 1999, pp. 107-119.
[15] S. Brinkkemper, “Method Engineering: Engineering of Information Systems Development Methods and Tools,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1996, pp. 275-280.
[16] R. Hirschheim and H. K. Klein, “Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 32, No.10, 1989, pp. 1199-1216.
[17] M. Huisman and J. Iivari, “Deployment of Systems Development Methodologies: Perceptual Congruence between IS Managers and Systems Developers,” Information & Management, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2006, pp. 29-49.
[18] P. Beynon-Davies and M. D. Williams, “The Diffusion of Information Systems Development Methods,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2003, pp. 29-46.
[19] V. Sambamurthy and L. J. Kirsch, “An Integrative Framework of the Information Systems Development Process,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2000, pp. 391-411.
[20] P. Beynon-Davies, “Information Systems: An Introduction to Informatics in Organizations,” Palgrave, Basingstoke, 2002.
[21] W. J. Orlikowski, “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of the Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1992, pp. 398-427.
[22] W. J. Orlikowski, “CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Increment,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1993, pp. 309-340.
[23] B. C. Hardgrave, F. D. Davis and C. K. Riemenschneider, “Investigating Determinants of Software Developers’ Intentions to Follow Methodologies,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2003, pp. 123-151.
[24] M. Huisman and J. Iivari, “The Individual Deployment of Systems Development Methodologies,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2348, 2002, pp. 134-150.
[25] R. G. Fichman and C. F. Kemerer, “The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective,” Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 10, 1997, pp. 1345-1363.
[26] E. Mustonen-Ollila and K. Lyytinen, “How Organizations Adopt Information Systems Process Innovations: A Longitudinal Analysis,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2004, pp. 35-51.
[27] G. Fischer and J. Ostwald, “Knowledge Communication in Design Communities,” In: R. Bromme, F. Hesse and H. Spada, Eds., Barriers and Biases in Computer-Medi- ated Knowledge Communication, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 2003, pp. 1-32.
[28] T. H. Kwon and R. W. Zmud, “Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation,” In: Boland, R. J. and Hirschheim, R. A. Eds., Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987, pp. 227-251.
[29] E. M. Rogers, “Diffusion of Innovations,” The Free Press, New York, 1995.
[30] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis and F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425-478.
[31] R. A. Johnson, B. C. Hardgrave and E. R. Doke, “An Industry Analysis of Developer Beliefs About Object- Oriented Systems Development,” The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1999, pp. 47-64.
[32] S. Newell, J. A. Swan and R. D. Galliers, “A Knowledge-Focused Perspective on the Diffusion and Adoption of Complex Information Technologies: The BPR Example,” Information Systems Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2000, pp. 239-259.
[33] R. G. Fichman, “The Assimilation and Diffusion of Software Process Innovations, Unpublished,” Ph. D. Dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, 1995.
[34] E. Wenger, “Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
[35] C. Ghezzi, M. Jazayeri and D. Mandrioli, “Fundamentals of Software Engineering,” 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, UK, 2003.
[36] K. Kumar and R. Welke, “Methodology Engineering: A Proposal for Situation-Specific Methodology Construction,” In: W. Cotterman and J. Senn, Eds., Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development, John Wiley & Sons, New York, US, 1992, pp. 257-269.
[37] M. L. Smith and C. Seward, “Causal Theories and Citizenship: Bridging the Theory-Data Gap in Sen’s Capability Approach,” The 5th International Conference on the Capability Approach: Knowledge and Public Action, Paris, France, September 11-14, 2005.
[38] C. J. Atkinson, “The Soft Information Systems and Technologies Methodology: An Actor Network Contingency Approach to Integrated Development,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2000, pp. 104-123.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.