Share This Article:

Feasibility of Performing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) after Mastectomy: A Case Report

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:168KB) PP. 91-93
DOI: 10.4236/jct.2010.12015    3,702 Downloads   7,194 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Previous mastectomy remains a contraindication to SLNB as normal drainage patterns of the breast can be disturbed. Patients diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy and later found to have microinvasive or invasive carci-noma at the time of mastectomy are deprived of the opportunity for SLNB and need to undergo axillary dissection. We explored the option and feasibility of performing SLNB in a 39-year-old female who underwent a simple mastectomy without axillary sampling for extensive DCIS and later found to have microinvasive ductal carcinoma on permanent pathology. Results: Lymphatic mapping using subdermal injection of 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid and blue dye led to the identification of five SLNs. Histopathologic examination showed no metastasis. Conclusion: SNLB is feasible in this setting. However, before its use is routinely adopted, its feasibility and accuracy has to be demonstrated in larger num-bers of patients in whom a negative SLNB is followed by a completion axillary dissection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

H. Bu-Ali and E. Mamouna, "Feasibility of Performing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) after Mastectomy: A Case Report," Journal of Cancer Therapy, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2010, pp. 91-93. doi: 10.4236/jct.2010.12015.

References

[1] D. Dinan, C. E. Nagle, J. Pettinga, “Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in Women with an Ipsilateral Second Breast Carcinoma and a History of Breast and Axillary Surgery,” AJS, Vol. 190, 2005, pp. 614-617.
[2] A. D. K. Hill, K. N. Tran, T. Akhurst, H. Yeung, S. D. J. Yeh, P. P. Rosen, P. Borgen and H. S. Cody, “Lessons Learned from 500 Cases of Lymphatic Mapping for Breast Cancer,” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 229, No.4, April 1999, pp. 528-535.
[3] A. E. Giuliano, D. M. Kirgan, J. M. Guenther and D. L. Morton, “Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphade-nectomy for Breast Cancer,” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 220, 1994, pp. 391-401.
[4] A. E. Giuliano, R. C. Jones, M. Brennan and R. Statman, “Sentinel Lymphadenectomy in Breast Cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 15, 1997, pp. 2345-2350.
[5] U. Veronesi, G. Paganelli, V. Galimberti, et al., “Sentinel Node Biopsy to Avoid Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer with Clinically Negative Nodes,” Lancet, Vol. 349, 1997, pp. 1864-1867.
[6] A. E. Giuliano, A. M. Barth, B. Spivack, P. D. Beitsch, S. W. Evans, “Incidence and Predictors of Axillary Metas-tases in T1 Carcinoma of the Breast,” Journal of American College Surgeons, Vol. 183, 1996, pp. 185-189.
[7] D. N. Krag, T. Ashikaga, S. P. Harlow, D. L. Weaver, “Development of Sentinel Node Targeting Techniques in Breast Cancer Patients,” Breast Journal, Vol. 4, 1998, pp. 67-74.
[8] J. J. Albertini, G. H. Lyman, C. Cox, et al., “Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Patient with Breast Cancer,” Journal of the American Medical Associ-ation, Vol. 276, 1996, pp. 1818-1822.
[9] P. J. Borgstein, S. Meijer, R. Pijpers, “Intradermal Blue Dye to Identify Sentinel Lymph-Node in Breast Cancer,” Lancet, Vol. 349, 1997, pp. 1668-1669.
[10] J. M. Guenther, M. Krishnamoorthy, L. R. Tan, “Sentinel lymphadenectomy for Breast Cancer in a Community Managed Care Setting,” Cancer Journal, Vol. 3, 1997, pp. 336-340.
[11] S. Meijer, G. J. Collet, H. J. Pijpers, L. van Hattum, O. S. Hoekstra, “Less Axillary Dissection Necessary Due to Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Carcinoma,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, Vol. 140, 1996, pp. 2239-2243.
[12] O. E. Nieweg, B. A. Kapteijn, J. L. Peterse, E. J. Rutgers, J. A. van Dongen and B. B. Kroon, “Identification of the Sentinel Node in Patients with Breast Carcinoma,” Ne-derlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, Vol. 140, 1996, pp. 2235-2239.
[13] S. P. Povoski, J. O. Olsen, D. C. Young, J. Clarke, W. E. Burak, M. J. Walker, W. E. Carson, L. D. Yee, D. M. Agnese, R. V. Pozderac, N. C. Hall and W. B. Farrar, “Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intradermal, Intraparenchymal, and Subareolar Injection Routes for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy in Breast Cancer,” Annals of Surgery Oncology, Vol. 13, No. 11, November 2006, pp. 1412-1421.
[14] M. Intra, P. Veronesi, O. D. Gentilini, G. Trifiro, A. Berrettini, R. Cecilio, M. Colleoni, M. Rietjens, A. Luini, G. Paganelli, U. Veronesi, “Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Is Feasible Even after Total Mastectomy,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 95, 2007, pp. 175-179.
[15] T. M. Tuttle, M. Colbert, R. Christensen, et al., “Sub-areolar Injection of 99mTc Facilitates Sentinel Lymph Node Identification,” Annals of Surgery Oncology, Vol. 9, 2002, pp. 77-81.
[16] K. Shimazu, Y. Tamaki, T. Taguchi, et al., “Lymphoscin-tigraphic Visualization of Internal Mammary Nodes with Subtumoral Injection of Radiocolloid in Patients with Breast Cancer,” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 237, 2003, pp. 390-398.
[17] E. Tousimis, K. J. van Zee, J. V. Fey, et al. “The Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Multicentric and Multifocal Invasive Breast Cancers,” Journal of American College Surgeons, Vol. 197, 2003, pp. 529-535.
[18] A. Agarwal, D. E. Heron, J. Sumkin, et al., “Contralateral Uptake and Metastases in Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Recurrent Breast Cancer,” Journal of Surgical On-cology, Vol. 92, 2005, pp. 4-8.
[19] E. R. Port, J. Fey, M. L. Gemignani, et al., “Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A New Option for Patients with Primary or Locally Recurrent Breast Carcinoma,” Journal of American College Surgeons, Vol. 195, 2002, pp. 167-172.
[20] M. Intra, G. Trifiro, G. Viale, et al., “Second Biopsy of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node for Reappearing Breast Cancer after Previous Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy,” Annals of Surgery Oncology, Vol. 12, 2005, pp. 895-899.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.