Assessing Chemical Mixtures and Human Health: Use of Bayesian Belief Net Analysis

DOI: 10.4236/jep.2012.36056   PDF   HTML     3,899 Downloads   5,813 Views   Citations


Background: Despite humans being exposed to complex chemical mixtures, much of the available research continues to focus on a single compound or metabolite or a select subgroup of compounds inconsistent with the nature of human exposure. Uncertainty regarding how best to model chemical mixtures coupled with few analytic approaches remains a formidable challenge and served as the impetus for the study. Objectives: To identify the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congener(s) within a chemical mixture that was most associated with an endometriosis diagnosis using novel graphical modeling techniques. Methods: Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) models were developed and empirically assessed in a cohort comprising 84 women aged 18 - 40 years who underwent a laparoscopy or laparotomy between 1999 and 2000; 79 (94%) women had serum concentrations for 68 PCB congeners quantified. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for endometriosis were estimated for individual PCB congeners using BBN models. Results: PCB congeners #114 (AOR = 3.01; 95% CI = 2.25, 3.77) and #136 (AOR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.03, 2.55) were associated with an endometriosis diagnosis. Combinations of mixtures inclusive of PCB #114 were all associated with higher odds of endometriosis, underscoring its potential relation with endometriosis. Conclusions: BBN models identified PCB congener 114 as the most influential congener for the odds of an endometriosis diagnosis in the context of a 68 congener chemical mixture. BBN models offer investigators the opportunity to assess which compounds within a mixture may drive a human health effect.

Share and Cite:

A. Roy, N. J. Perkins and G. M. Buck Louis, "Assessing Chemical Mixtures and Human Health: Use of Bayesian Belief Net Analysis," Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 3 No. 6, 2012, pp. 462-468. doi: 10.4236/jep.2012.36056.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] G. M. Buck Louis, C. D. Lynch and M. A. Cooney, “Environmental Influences on Female Fecundity and Fertility,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2006, pp. 147-155. doi:10.1055/s-2006-944421
[2] G. Torf, L. Hagmar, A. Giwercman and J. P. Bonde, “Epidemiological Evidence on Reproductive Effects of Persistent Organochlorines in Humans,” Reproductive Toxicology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2004, pp. 5-26. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.05.006
[3] A. Mayani, S. Barel, S. Soback and M. Almagor, “Dioxin Concentrations in Women with Endometriosis,” Human Reproduction, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1997, pp. 373-375. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.2.373
[4] B. Trabert, A. J. De Roos, S. M. Schwartz, U. Peters, D. Scholes, D. B. Barr, et al., “Non-Dioxin-Like Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Risk of Endometriosis,” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 118, 2010, pp. 1280-1285. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901444
[5] K. B. Moysich, P. Mendola, E. F. Schisterman, J. L. Freudenheim, C. B. Ambrosone, J. E. Vena, et al., “An Evaluation of Proposed Frameworks for Grouping Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Congener Data into Meaningful Analytic Units,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1999, pp. 223-231. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199903)35:3<223::AID-AJIM2>3.0.CO;2-L
[6] M. S. Wolff, D. Camann, M. Gammon and S. D. Stellman, “Proposed PCB Congener Groupings for Epidemiological Studies,” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 105, No. 1, 1997, pp. 13-14. doi:10.1289/ehp.9710513
[7] A. Pauwels, P. J. C. Schepens, T. D’Hooghe, L. Delbeke, M. Dhont, A. Brouwer, et al., “The Risk of Endometriosis and Exposure to Dioxins and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: A Case-Control Study of Infertile Women,” Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 10, 2001, pp. 2050-2055. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.10.2050
[8] P. S. Cooke, T. Sato and D. L. Buchanan, “Disruption of Steroid Hormone Signaling by PCBs,” In: L. W. Robertson and L. G. Hansen, Eds., PCBs: Recent Advances in Environmental Toxicology and Health Effects, The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, 2001, pp. 257-263.
[9] G. M. Buck Louis, J. M. Weiner, B. W. Whitcomb, R. Sperrazza, E. F. Schisterman, D. T. Lobdell, et al., “Environmental PCB Exposure and Risk of Endometriosis,” Human Reproduction, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2005, pp. 279-285. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh575
[10] C. Gennings, R. Sabo and E. Carney, “Identifying Subsets of Complex Mixtures Most Associated with Complex Diseases: Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Endometriosis as a Case Study,” Epidemiology, Vol. 21, 2010, pp. 77-84. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181ce946c
[11] G. S. DiZerega, D. L. Barber and G. D. Hodgen, “Endometriosis: Role of Ovarian Steroids in Initiation, Maintenance, and Suppression,” Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 33, 1980, pp. 649-653.
[12] S. Kennedy, A. Bergqqvist, C. Chapron, T. D’Hooghe, G. Dunselmans, R. Greb, et al., “ESHRE Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis,” Human Reproduction, Vol. 20, No. 10, 2005, pp. 2698-2704. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei135
[13] American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee, “Endometriosis and Infertility,” Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 86, No. 5, 2006, pp. S156-S160. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.014
[14] M. S. Bloom, G. M. Buck Louis, E. F. Schisterman and A. Liu, “Maternal Serum Polychlorinated Biphenyl Concentrations across Critical Windows of Human Development,” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 115, 2007, pp. 1320-1324. doi:10.1289/ehp.10086
[15] D. J. Phillips, J. L. Pirkle, V. W. Burse, J. T. Pernert, L. O. Henderson and L. L. Needham, “Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Levels in Human Serum: Effects of Fasting and Feeding,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1989, pp. 495-500. doi:10.1007/BF01055015
[16] T. J. Bedford and R. M. Cooke, “Vines—A New Graphical Model for Dependent Random Variables,” Annals of Statistics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2002, pp. 1031-1068. doi:10.1214/aos/1031689016
[17] A. M. Hanea, D. Kurowicka and R. M. Cooke, “Hybrid Method for Quantifying and Analyzing Bayesian Belief Nets,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2006, pp. 709-729. doi:10.1002/qre.808
[18] A. M. Hanea, D. Kurowicka, R. M. Cook and D. M. Ababei, “Mining and Visualizing Ordinal Data with NonParametric Continuous BBNs,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2010, pp. 668-687. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2008.09.032
[19] D. Kurowicka and R. M. Cooke, “Uncertainty Analysis and High Dimensional Dependence Modeling,” Wiley, New York, 2006. doi:10.1002/0470863072
[20] S. Greenland, J. Pearl and J. M. Robins, “Causal Diagrams for Epidemiologic Research,” Epidemiology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1999, pp. 37-48. doi:10.1097/00001648-199901000-00008
[21] Risk and Environmental Modeling Group, “Uninet 2.74 Software,” Delft University of Technology, 2008.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.